summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang/test/CodeGen/packed-arrays.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Update clang for D20348Peter Collingbourne2016-06-141-12/+12
| | | | | | Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20339 llvm-svn: 272710
* Compute and preserve alignment more faithfully in IR-generation.John McCall2015-09-081-2/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton of code to compute and propagate alignment information. As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in the expression emitter. The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct when performing operations on objects that are locally known to be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with member alignment. Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset. We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular, field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min. Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics, but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I apologize. ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is, we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals). This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later patch. I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store} APIs; they will be going away eventually. llvm-svn: 246985
* Update Clang tests to handle explicitly typed load changes in LLVM.David Blaikie2015-02-271-15/+15
| | | | llvm-svn: 230795
* CHECK-LABEL-ify some code gen tests to improve diagnostic experience when ↵Stephen Lin2013-08-151-15/+15
| | | | | | tests fail. llvm-svn: 188447
* __alignof attribute on the field must considerFariborz Jahanian2011-05-051-8/+6
| | | | | | packed attribute on the field. //rdar://9217290 llvm-svn: 130948
* IRgen: Reapply r128691 with a fix to ensure we don't increase alignment pastDaniel Dunbar2011-04-011-0/+157
| | | | | | that of the array element type. llvm-svn: 128698
* Revert r128691, "IRgen: Improve GCC compatibility when dealing with packedDaniel Dunbar2011-04-011-147/+0
| | | | | | arrays by propagating", it's breaking test in ways I don't understand yet. llvm-svn: 128693
* IRgen: Improve GCC compatibility when dealing with packed arrays by propagatingDaniel Dunbar2011-03-311-0/+147
the array alignment to the array access. - This is more or less the best we can do without having alignment present in the type system, but is a long way from truly matching how GCC handles this. llvm-svn: 128691
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud