bcm5719-llvm - Project Ortega BCM5719 LLVM

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	findDominatingStoreToReturn in CGCall.cpp didn't check if a candidate store	Jakub Kuderski	2015-09-08	1	-0/+17
	instruction used the ReturnValue as pointer operand or value operand. This led to wrong code gen - in later stages (load-store elision code) the found store and its operand would be erased, causing ReturnValue to become a <badref>. The patch adds a check that makes sure that ReturnValue is a pointer operand of store instruction. Regression test is also added. This fixes PR24386. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12400 llvm-svn: 247003