| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
specification) to an error. No compiler other than Clang seems to allow this,
and it doesn't seem like a useful thing to accept as an extension in general.
The current behavior was added for PR5957, where the problem was specifically
related to mismatches of the exception specification on the implicitly-declared
global operator new and delete. To retain that workaround, we downgrade the
error to an ExtWarn when the declaration is of a replaceable global allocation
function.
Now that this is an error, stop trying (and failing) to recover from a missing
computed noexcept specification. That recovery didn't work, and led to crashes
in code like the added testcase.
llvm-svn: 248867
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Disambiguate past such a potential problem, and use the absence of 'typename'
to break ties in favor of a parenthesized thingy being an initializer, if
nothing else in the declaration disambiguates it as declaring a function.
llvm-svn: 156963
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
-std=c++0x. Patch by Ahmed Charles!
llvm-svn: 141900
|
|
|
Change the interface to expose the new information and deal with the enormous fallout.
Introduce the new ExceptionSpecificationType value EST_DynamicNone to more easily deal with empty throw specifications.
Update the tests for noexcept and fix the various bugs uncovered, such as lack of tentative parsing support.
llvm-svn: 127537
|
