| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The more entries we have in AnalyzerOptions::ConfigTable, the more helpful
debug.ConfigDumper is. With this patch, I'm pretty confident that it'll now emit
the entire state of the analyzer, minus the frontend flags.
It would be nice to reserve the config table specifically to checker options
only, as storing the regular analyzer configs is kinda redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57922
llvm-svn: 361006
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When plugins aren't enabled, don't try to run plugins tests. Don't
enable plugins unconditionally based on the platform, instead check
if LLVM shared library is actually being built which may not be the
case for every host configuration, even if the host itself supports
plugins.
This addresses test failures introduced by r360891/D59464.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62050
llvm-svn: 360991
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59465
llvm-svn: 360910
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Buildbots complained that they couldn't find the newly added plugins.
The solution was to move the check-clang cmake target closer to the bottom of
the file, after the new dependencies are added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59464
llvm-svn: 360891
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Buildbots don't seem to find the new plugin.
llvm-svn: 360805
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also, I moved the existing analyzer plugin to test/ as well, in order not to
give the illusion that the analyzer supports plugins -- it's capable of handling
them, but does not _support_ them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59464
llvm-svn: 360799
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The checker was crashing when it was trying to assume a structure
to be null or non-null so that to evaluate the effect of the annotation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61958
llvm-svn: 360790
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Suppress MIG checker false positives that occur when the programmer increments
the reference count before calling a MIG destructor, and the MIG destructor
literally boils down to decrementing the reference count.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61925
llvm-svn: 360737
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When looking for the location context of the call site, unwrap block invocation
contexts because they are attached to the current AnalysisDeclContext
while what we need is the previous AnalysisDeclContext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61545
llvm-svn: 360202
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
primitive.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41741
Pretty much the same as D61246 and D61106, this time for __complex__ types. Upon
further investigation, I realized that we should regard all types
Type::isScalarType returns true for as primitive, so I merged
isMemberPointerType(), isBlockPointerType() and isAnyComplexType()` into that
instead.
I also stumbled across yet another bug,
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41753, but it seems to be unrelated to
this checker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61569
llvm-svn: 359998
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-analyzer-checker-help, but do under the new flag -analyzer-checker-help-hidden
During my work on analyzer dependencies, I created a great amount of new
checkers that emitted no diagnostics at all, and were purely modeling some
function or another.
However, the user shouldn't really disable/enable these by hand, hence this
patch, which hides these by default. I intentionally chose not to hide alpha
checkers, because they have a scary enough name, in my opinion, to cause no
surprise when they emit false positives or cause crashes.
The patch introduces the Hidden bit into the TableGen files (you may remember
it before I removed it in D53995), and checkers that are either marked as
hidden, or are in a package that is marked hidden won't be displayed under
-analyzer-checker-help. -analyzer-checker-help-hidden, a new flag meant for
developers only, displays the full list.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60925
llvm-svn: 359720
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reference expected files not ending with a newline are normalized to
have said newlines. Additionally `plist-macros-with-expansion.cpp.plist`
is modified to add a line that is ignored by `%diff_plist`, but not by
the more sensitive pattern proposed by
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-April/061904.html for
`%normalize_plist`.
llvm-svn: 359692
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cases; NFC
For various files under `clang/test/Analysis`, D52036 applied
`%diff_plist` to replace `diff` invocations with certain options and
D56340 swapped the order of the arguments so that the reference file
comes first. The tests that used `tail` to filter the test output were
not modified accordingly. This patch applies the corresponding update
to those tests.
llvm-svn: 359691
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41611
Similarly to D61106, the checker ran over an llvm_unreachable for vector types:
struct VectorSizeLong {
VectorSizeLong() {}
__attribute__((__vector_size__(16))) long x;
};
void __vector_size__LongTest() {
VectorSizeLong v;
}
Since, according to my short research,
"The vector_size attribute is only applicable to integral and float scalars,
although arrays, pointers, and function return values are allowed in conjunction
with this construct."
[src: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.1/gcc/Vector-Extensions.html#Vector-Extensions]
vector types are safe to regard as primitive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61246
llvm-svn: 359539
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently we always inline functions that have no branches, i.e. have exactly
three CFG blocks: ENTRY, some code, EXIT. This makes sense because when there
are no branches, it means that there's no exponential complexity introduced
by inlining such function. Such functions also don't trigger various fundamental
problems with our inlining mechanism, such as the problem of inlined
defensive checks.
Sometimes the CFG may contain more blocks, but in practice it still has
linear structure because all directions (except, at most, one) of all branches
turned out to be unreachable. When this happens, still treat the function
as "small". This is useful, in particular, for dealing with C++17 if constexpr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61051
llvm-svn: 359531
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't crash when trying to model a call in which the callee is unknown
in compile time, eg. a pointer-to-member call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61285
llvm-svn: 359530
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the OSObject universe there appears to be another slightly popular contract,
apart from "create" and "get", which is "matching". It optionally consumes
a "table" parameter and if a table is passed, it fills in the table and
returns it at +0; otherwise, it creates a new table, fills it in and
returns it at +1.
For now suppress false positives by doing a conservative escape on all functions
that end with "Matching", which is the naming convention that seems to be
followed by all such methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61161
llvm-svn: 359264
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Because RetainCountChecker has custom "local" reasoning about escapes,
it has a separate facility to deal with tracked symbols at end of analysis
and check them for leaks regardless of whether they're dead or not.
This facility iterates over the list of tracked symbols and reports
them as leaks, but it needs to treat the return value specially.
Some custom allocators tend to return the value with an offset, storing
extra metadata at the beginning of the buffer. In this case the return value
would be a non-base region. In order to avoid false positives, we still need to
find the original symbol within the return value, otherwise it'll be unable
to match it to the item in the list of tracked symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60991
llvm-svn: 359263
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the assertion is in fact incorrect: there is a cornercase in Objective-C++
in which a C++ object is not constructed with a constructor, but merely
zero-initialized. Namely, this happens when an Objective-C message is sent
to a nil and it is supposed to return a C++ object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60988
llvm-svn: 359262
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Caused by incorrect strlcat() modeling in r332303,
cf. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37687#c8
llvm-svn: 359237
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
primitive
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41590
For the following code snippet, UninitializedObjectChecker crashed:
struct MyAtomicInt {
_Atomic(int) x;
MyAtomicInt() {}
};
void entry() {
MyAtomicInt b;
}
The problem was that _Atomic types were not regular records, unions,
dereferencable or primitive, making the checker hit the llvm_unreachable at
lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/UninitializedObject/UninitializedObjectChecker.cpp:347.
The solution is to regard these types as primitive as well. The test case shows
that with this addition, not only are we able to get rid of the crash, but we
can identify x as uninitialized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61106
llvm-svn: 359230
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
introduce any names.
llvm-svn: 359051
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If macro "CHECK_X(x)" expands to something like "if (x != NULL) ...",
the "Assuming..." note no longer says "Assuming 'x' is equal to CHECK_X".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59121
llvm-svn: 359037
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The existing CTU mechanism imports `FunctionDecl`s where the definition is available in another TU. This patch extends that to VarDecls, to bind more constants.
- Add VarDecl importing functionality to CrossTranslationUnitContext
- Import Decls while traversing them in AnalysisConsumer
- Add VarDecls to CTU external mappings generator
- Name changes from "external function map" to "external definition map"
Reviewers: NoQ, dcoughlin, xazax.hun, george.karpenkov, martong
Reviewed By: xazax.hun
Subscribers: Charusso, baloghadamsoftware, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, george.karpenkov, mgorny, whisperity, szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46421
llvm-svn: 358968
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When growing a body on a body farm, it's essential to use the same redeclaration
of the function that's going to be used during analysis. Otherwise our
ParmVarDecls won't match the ones that are used to identify argument regions.
This boils down to trusting the reasoning in AnalysisDeclContext. We shouldn't
canonicalize the declaration before farming the body because it makes us not
obey the sophisticated decision-making process of AnalysisDeclContext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60899
llvm-svn: 358946
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stuffing invalid source locations (such as those in functions produced by
body farms) into path diagnostics causes crashes.
Fix a typo in a nearby function name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60808
llvm-svn: 358945
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Implement cplusplus.SmartPtrModeling, a new checker that doesn't
emit any warnings but models methods of smart pointers more precisely.
For now the only thing it does is make `(bool) P` return false when `P`
is a freshly moved pointer. This addresses a false positive in the
use-after-move-checker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60796
llvm-svn: 358944
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Moved UninitializedObjectChecker from the 'alpha.cplusplus' to the
'optin.cplusplus' package.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58573
llvm-svn: 358797
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reapplies commit r357323, fixing memory leak found by LSan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58367
llvm-svn: 358781
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TL;DR:
* Add checker and package options to the TableGen files
* Added a new class called CmdLineOption, and both Package and Checker recieved
a list<CmdLineOption> field.
* Added every existing checker and package option to Checkers.td.
* The CheckerRegistry class
* Received some comments to most of it's inline classes
* Received the CmdLineOption and PackageInfo inline classes, a list of
CmdLineOption was added to CheckerInfo and PackageInfo
* Added addCheckerOption and addPackageOption
* Added a new field called Packages, used in addPackageOptions, filled up in
addPackage
Detailed description:
In the last couple months, a lot of effort was put into tightening the
analyzer's command line interface. The main issue is that it's spectacularly
easy to mess up a lenghty enough invocation of the analyzer, and the user was
given no warnings or errors at all in that case.
We can divide the effort of resolving this into several chapters:
* Non-checker analyzer configurations:
Gather every analyzer configuration into a dedicated file. Emit errors for
non-existent configurations or incorrect values. Be able to list these
configurations. Tighten AnalyzerOptions interface to disallow making such
a mistake in the future.
* Fix the "Checker Naming Bug" by reimplementing checker dependencies:
When cplusplus.InnerPointer was enabled, it implicitly registered
unix.Malloc, which implicitly registered some sort of a modeling checker
from the CStringChecker family. This resulted in all of these checker
objects recieving the name "cplusplus.InnerPointer", making AnalyzerOptions
asking for the wrong checker options from the command line:
cplusplus.InnerPointer:Optimisic
istead of
unix.Malloc:Optimistic.
This was resolved by making CheckerRegistry responsible for checker
dependency handling, instead of checkers themselves.
* Checker options: (this patch included!)
Same as the first item, but for checkers.
(+ minor fixes here and there, and everything else that is yet to come)
There were several issues regarding checker options, that non-checker
configurations didn't suffer from: checker plugins are loaded runtime, and they
could add new checkers and new options, meaning that unlike for non-checker
configurations, we can't collect every checker option purely by generating code.
Also, as seen from the "Checker Naming Bug" issue raised above, they are very
rarely used in practice, and all sorts of skeletons fell out of the closet while
working on this project.
They were extremely problematic for users as well, purely because of how long
they were. Consider the following monster of a checker option:
alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:CheckPointeeInitialization=false
While we were able to verify whether the checker itself (the part before the
colon) existed, any errors past that point were unreported, easily resulting
in 7+ hours of analyses going to waste.
This patch, similarly to how dependencies were reimplemented, uses TableGen to
register checker options into Checkers.td, so that Checkers.inc now contains
entries for both checker and package options. Using the preprocessor,
Checkers.inc is converted into code in CheckerRegistry, adding every builtin
(checkers and packages that have an entry in the Checkers.td file) checker and
package option to the registry. The new addPackageOption and addCheckerOption
functions expose the same functionality to statically-linked non-builtin and
plugin checkers and packages as well.
Emitting errors for incorrect user input, being able to list these options, and
some other functionalies will land in later patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57855
llvm-svn: 358752
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ideally, there is no reason behind not being able to depend on checkers that
come from a different plugin (or on builtin checkers) -- however, this is only
possible if all checkers are added to the registry before resolving checker
dependencies. Since I used a binary search in my addDependency method, this also
resulted in an assertion failure (due to CheckerRegistry::Checkers not being
sorted), since the function used by plugins to register their checkers
(clang_registerCheckers) calls addDependency.
This patch resolves this issue by only noting which dependencies have to
established when addDependency is called, and resolves them at a later stage
when no more checkers are added to the registry, by which point
CheckerRegistry::Checkers is already sorted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59461
llvm-svn: 358750
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Default RegionStore bindings represent values that can be obtained by loading
from anywhere within the region, not just the specific offset within the region
that they are said to be bound to. For example, default-binding a character \0
to an int (eg., via memset()) means that the whole int is 0, not just
that its lower byte is 0.
Even though memset and bzero were modeled this way, it didn't work correctly
when applied to simple variables. Eg., in
int x;
memset(x, 0, sizeof(x));
we did produce a default binding, but were unable to read it later, and 'x'
was perceived as an uninitialized variable even after memset.
At the same time, if we replace 'x' with a variable of a structure or array
type, accessing fields or elements of such variable was working correctly,
which was enough for most cases. So this was only a problem for variables of
simple integer/enumeration/floating-point/pointer types.
Fix loading default bindings from RegionStore for regions of simple variables.
Add a unit test to document the API contract as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60742
llvm-svn: 358722
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This -verify=prefix feature is quite underrated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60732
llvm-svn: 358719
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
warnings.
llvm-svn: 358626
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
recognized
For the following code snippet:
void builtin_function_call_crash_fixes(char *c) {
__builtin_strncpy(c, "", 6);
__builtin_memset(c, '\0', (0));
__builtin_memcpy(c, c, 0);
}
security.insecureAPI.DeprecatedOrUnsafeBufferHandling caused a regression, as it
didn't recognize functions starting with __builtin_. Fixed exactly that.
I wanted to modify an existing test file, but the two I found didn't seem like
perfect candidates. While I was there, I prettified their RUN: lines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59812
llvm-svn: 358609
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Writing stuff into an argument variable is usually equivalent to writing stuff
to a local variable: it will have no effect outside of the function.
There's an important exception from this rule: if the argument variable has
a non-trivial destructor, the destructor would be invoked on
the parent stack frame, exposing contents of the otherwise dead
argument variable to the caller.
If such argument is the last place where a pointer is stored before the function
exits and the function is the one we've started our analysis from (i.e., we have
no caller context for it), we currently diagnose a leak. This is incorrect
because the destructor of the argument still has access to the pointer.
The destructor may deallocate the pointer or even pass it further.
Treat writes into such argument regions as "escapes" instead, suppressing
spurious memory leak reports but not messing with dead symbol removal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60112
llvm-svn: 358321
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The idea behind this heuristic is that normally the visitor is there to
inform the user that a certain function may fail to initialize a certain
out-parameter. For system header functions this is usually dictated by the
contract, and it's unlikely that the header function has accidentally
forgot to put the value into the out-parameter; it's more likely
that the user has intentionally skipped the error check.
Warnings on skipped error checks are more like security warnings;
they aren't necessarily useful for all users, and they should instead
be introduced on a per-API basis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60107
llvm-svn: 357810
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r352473.
The overall idea is great, but it seems to cause unintented consequences
when not only Region Store invalidation but also pointer escape mechanism
was accidentally affected.
Based on discussions in https://reviews.llvm.org/D58121#1452483
and https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230#1434161
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230
llvm-svn: 357620
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: Higuoxing
Reviewed By: Higuoxing
Subscribers: kubamracek, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60183
llvm-svn: 357577
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
__builtin_constant_p(x) is a compiler builtin that evaluates to 1 when
its argument x is a compile-time constant and to 0 otherwise. In CodeGen
it is simply lowered to the respective LLVM intrinsic. In the Analyzer
we've been trying to delegate modeling to Expr::EvaluateAsInt, which is
allowed to sometimes fail for no apparent reason.
When it fails, let's conservatively return false. Modeling it as false
is pretty much never wrong, and it is only required to return true
on a best-effort basis, which every user should expect.
Fixes VLAChecker false positives on code that tries to emulate
static asserts in C by constructing a VLA of dynamic size -1 under the
assumption that this dynamic size is actually a constant
in the sense of __builtin_constant_p.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60110
llvm-svn: 357557
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59914
llvm-svn: 357335
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r357323.
ASan leaks found by a buildbot :)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58367
llvm-svn: 357332
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NoStoreFuncVisitor.
It turns out that SourceManager::isInSystemHeader() crashes when an invalid
source location is passed into it. Invalid source locations are relatively
common: not only they come from body farms, but also, say, any function in C
that didn't come with a forward declaration would have an implicit
forward declaration with invalid source locations.
There's a more comfy API for us to use in the Static Analyzer:
CallEvent::isInSystemHeader(), so just use that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59901
llvm-svn: 357329
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is now an inter-checker communication API, similar to the one that
connects MallocChecker/CStringChecker/InnerPointerChecker: simply a set of
setters and getters for a state trait.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59861
llvm-svn: 357326
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The transfer function for the CFG element that represents a logical operation
computes the value of the operation and does nothing else. The element
appears after all the short circuit decisions were made, so they don't need
to be made again at this point.
Because our expression evaluation is imprecise, it is often hard to
discriminate between:
(1) we don't know the value of the RHS because we failed to evaluate it
and
(2) we don't know the value of the RHS because it didn't need to be evaluated.
This is hard because it depends on our knowledge about the value of the LHS
(eg., if LHS is true, then RHS in (LHS || RHS) doesn't need to be computed)
but LHS itself may have been evaluated imprecisely and we don't know whether
it is true or not. Additionally, the Analyzer wouldn't necessarily even remember
what the value of the LHS was because theoretically it's not really necessary
to know it for any future evaluations.
In order to work around these issues, the transfer function for logical
operations consists in looking at the ExplodedGraph we've constructed so far
in order to figure out from which CFG direction did we arrive here.
Such post-factum backtracking that doesn't involve looking up LHS and RHS values
is usually possible. However sometimes it fails because when we deduplicate
exploded nodes with the same program point and the same program state we may end
up in a situation when we reached the same program point from two or more
different directions.
By removing the assertion, we admit that the procedure indeed sometimes fails to
work. When it fails, we also admit that we don't know the value of the logical
operator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59857
llvm-svn: 357325
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Almost all path-sensitive checkers need to tell the user when something specific
to that checker happens along the execution path but does not constitute a bug
on its own. For instance, a call to operator delete in C++ has consequences
that are specific to a use-after-free bug. Deleting an object is not a bug
on its own, but when the Analyzer finds an execution path on which a deleted
object is used, it'll have to explain to the user when exactly during that path
did the deallocation take place.
Historically such custom notes were added by implementing "bug report visitors".
These visitors were post-processing bug reports by visiting every ExplodedNode
along the path and emitting path notes whenever they noticed that a change that
is relevant to a bug report occurs within the program state. For example,
it emits a "memory is deallocated" note when it notices that a pointer changes
its state from "allocated" to "deleted".
The "visitor" approach is powerful and efficient but hard to use because
such preprocessing implies that the developer first models the effects
of the event (say, changes the pointer's state from "allocated" to "deleted"
as part of operator delete()'s transfer function) and then forgets what happened
and later tries to reverse-engineer itself and figure out what did it do
by looking at the report.
The proposed approach tries to avoid discarding the information that was
available when the transfer function was evaluated. Instead, it allows the
developer to capture all the necessary information into a closure that
will be automatically invoked later in order to produce the actual note.
This should reduce boilerplate and avoid very painful logic duplication.
On the technical side, the closure is a lambda that's put into a special kind of
a program point tag, and a special bug report visitor visits all nodes in the
report and invokes all note-producing closures it finds along the path.
For now it is up to the lambda to make sure that the note is actually relevant
to the report. For instance, a memory deallocation note would be irrelevant when
we're reporting a division by zero bug or if we're reporting a use-after-free
of a different, unrelated chunk of memory. The lambda can figure these thing out
by looking at the bug report object that's passed into it.
A single checker is refactored to make use of the new functionality: MIGChecker.
Its program state is trivial, making it an easy testing ground for the first
version of the API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58367
llvm-svn: 357323
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since rL335814, if the constraint manager cannot find a range set for `A - B`
(where `A` and `B` are symbols) it looks for a range for `B - A` and returns
it negated if it exists. However, if a range set for both `A - B` and `B - A`
is stored then it only returns the first one. If we both use `A - B` and
`B - A`, these expressions behave as two totally unrelated symbols. This way
we miss some useful deductions which may lead to false negatives or false
positives.
This tiny patch changes this behavior: if the symbolic expression the
constraint manager is looking for is a difference `A - B`, it tries to
retrieve the range for both `A - B` and `B - A` and if both exists it returns
the intersection of range `A - B` and the negated range of `B - A`. This way
every time a checker applies new constraints to the symbolic difference or to
its negated it always affects both the original difference and its negated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55007
llvm-svn: 357167
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
r356634 didn't fix all the problems caused by r356222 - even though simple
constructors involving transparent init-list expressions are now evaluated
precisely, many more complicated constructors aren't, for other reasons.
The attached test case is an example of a constructor that will never be
evaluated precisely - simply because there isn't a constructor there (instead,
the program invokes run-time undefined behavior by returning without a return
statement that should have constructed the return value).
Fix another part of the problem for such situations: evaluate transparent
init-list expressions transparently, so that to avoid creating ill-formed
"transparent" nonloc::CompoundVals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59622
llvm-svn: 356969
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When searching for construction contexts, i.e. figuring out which statements
define the object that is constructed by each construct-expression, ignore
transparent init-list expressions because they don't add anything to the
context. This allows the Static Analyzer to model construction, destruction,
materialization, lifetime extension correctly in more cases. Also fixes
a crash caused by incorrectly evaluating initial values of variables
initialized with such expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59573
llvm-svn: 356634
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These diagnose overflowing calls to subset of fortifiable functions. Some
functions, like sprintf or strcpy aren't supported right not, but we should
probably support these in the future. We previously supported this kind of
functionality with -Wbuiltin-memcpy-chk-size, but that diagnostic doesn't work
with _FORTIFY implementations that use wrapper functions. Also unlike that
diagnostic, we emit these warnings regardless of whether _FORTIFY_SOURCE is
actually enabled, which is nice for programs that don't enable the runtime
checks.
Why not just use diagnose_if, like Bionic does? We can get better diagnostics in
the compiler (i.e. mention the sizes), and we have the potential to diagnose
sprintf and strcpy which is impossible with diagnose_if (at least, in languages
that don't support C++14 constexpr). This approach also saves standard libraries
from having to add diagnose_if.
rdar://48006655
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58797
llvm-svn: 356397
|
