| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
be linearized only when used by the static analyzer. This required a rewrite of LiveVariables, and exposed a ton of subtle bugs.
The motivation of this large change is to drastically simplify the logic in ExprEngine going forward.
Some fallout is that the output of some BugReporterVisitors is not as accurate as before; those will
need to be fixed over time. There is also some possible performance regression as RemoveDeadBindings
will be called frequently; this can also be improved over time.
llvm-svn: 136419
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The relative checker package is 'debug':
'-dump-live-variables' is replaced by '-analyzer-checker=debug.DumpLiveVars'
'-cfg-view' is replaced by '-analyzer-checker=debug.ViewCFG'
'-cfg-dump' is replaced by '-analyzer-checker=debug.DumpCFG'
llvm-svn: 125780
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
class and to bind the shared value using OpaqueValueExpr. This fixes an
unnoticed problem with deserialization of these expressions where the
deserialized form would lose the vital pointer-equality trait; or rather,
it fixes it because this patch also does the right thing for deserializing
OVEs.
Change OVEs to not be a "temporary object" in the sense that copy elision is
permitted.
This new representation is not totally unawkward to work with, but I think
that's really part and parcel with the semantics we're modelling here. In
particular, it's much easier to fix things like the copy elision bug and to
make the CFG look right.
I've tried to update the analyzer to deal with this in at least some
obvious cases, and I think we get a much better CFG out, but the printing
of OpaqueValueExprs probably needs some work.
llvm-svn: 125744
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Elidable CXXConstructExpr should inhibit calling destructor for temporary
that is copied, not the one created. This is because eliding copy constructor
means that the object that was to be copied will be constructed directly in
memory the copy would be constructed in.
llvm-svn: 119044
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
CXXConstructExpr.
llvm-svn: 118991
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 118166
|
|
|
that are not handled properly:
1. For statement: const C& c = C(0) ?: C(1) destructors generated for condition will not differ from those generated for case without prolonged lifetime of temporary,
2. There will be no destructor for constant reference member bound to temporary at the exit from constructor.
llvm-svn: 118158
|
