| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | Add a new -Wundefined-inline warning for inline functions which are used but not | Nick Lewycky | 2013-02-01 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | | | defined. Fixes PR14993! llvm-svn: 174158 | ||||
| * | Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to ↵ | Andy Gibbs | 2012-10-19 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | | | | | | | VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive. llvm-svn: 166280 | ||||
| * | [analyzer] Fix a spurious undef value warning. | Anna Zaks | 2012-06-01 | 1 | -0/+57 |
| When we timeout or exceed a max number of blocks within an inlined function, we retry with no inlining starting from a node right before the CallEnter node. We assume the state of that node is the state of the program before we start evaluating the call. However, the node pruning removes this node as unimportant. Teach the node pruning to keep the predecessors of the call enter nodes. llvm-svn: 157860 | |||||

