| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
package.
llvm-svn: 220289
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
As per Ted’s suggestion!
llvm-svn: 178938
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As mentioned in the previous commit message, the use-after-free and
double-free warnings for 'delete' are worth enabling even while the
leak warnings still have false positives.
llvm-svn: 178891
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This splits the leak-checking part of alpha.cplusplus.NewDelete into a
separate user-level checker, alpha.cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks. All the
difficult false positives we've seen with the new/delete checker have been
spurious leak warnings; the use-after-free warnings and mismatched
deallocator warnings, while rare, have always been valid.
<rdar://problem/6194569>
llvm-svn: 178890
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 178529
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
+ Refactoring.
llvm-svn: 178388
|
|
|
allocate memory in heap.
+ Improved test coverage for cplusplus.NewDelete checker.
llvm-svn: 178244
|
