| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
package.
llvm-svn: 220289
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
As per Ted’s suggestion!
llvm-svn: 178938
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As mentioned in the previous commit message, the use-after-free and
double-free warnings for 'delete' are worth enabling even while the
leak warnings still have false positives.
llvm-svn: 178891
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This splits the leak-checking part of alpha.cplusplus.NewDelete into a
separate user-level checker, alpha.cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks. All the
difficult false positives we've seen with the new/delete checker have been
spurious leak warnings; the use-after-free warnings and mismatched
deallocator warnings, while rare, have always been valid.
<rdar://problem/6194569>
llvm-svn: 178890
|
|
|
MallocChecker.cpp
This fixes an issue pointed to by Jordan: if unix.Malloc and unix.MismatchedDeallocator are both on, then we end up still tracking leaks of memory allocated by new.
Moved the guards right before emitting the bug reports to unify and simplify the logic of handling of multiple checkers. Now all the checkers perform their checks regardless of if they were enabled, or not, and it is decided just before the emitting of the report, if it should be emitted. (idea from Anna).
Additional changes:
improved test coverage for checker correlations;
refactoring: BadDealloc -> MismatchedDealloc
llvm-svn: 178814
|
