summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang/lib/Serialization
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
...
* [clang] Adopt new FileManager error-returning APIsHarlan Haskins2019-08-013-36/+50
| | | | | | | Update the callers of FileManager::getFile and FileManager::getDirectory to handle the new llvm::ErrorOr-returning methods. Signed-off-by: Harlan Haskins <harlan@apple.com> llvm-svn: 367616
* Revert "[Sema] Diagnose default-initialization, destruction, and copying of"Akira Hatanaka2019-07-262-12/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit r365985. Prior to r365985, clang used to mark C union fields that have non-trivial ObjC ownership qualifiers as unavailable if the union was declared in a system header. r365985 stopped doing so, which caused the swift compiler to crash when it tried to import a non-trivial union. I have a patch that fixes the crash (https://reviews.llvm.org/D65256), but I'm temporarily reverting the original patch until we can decide on whether it's taking the right approach. llvm-svn: 367076
* Fix parameter name comments using clang-tidy. NFC.Rui Ueyama2019-07-165-11/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch applies clang-tidy's bugprone-argument-comment tool to LLVM, clang and lld source trees. Here is how I created this patch: $ git clone https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git $ cd llvm-project $ mkdir build $ cd build $ cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS='clang;lld;clang-tools-extra' \ -DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=On -DLLVM_ENABLE_LLD=On \ -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ ../llvm $ ninja $ parallel clang-tidy -checks='-*,bugprone-argument-comment' \ -config='{CheckOptions: [{key: StrictMode, value: 1}]}' -fix \ ::: ../llvm/lib/**/*.{cpp,h} ../clang/lib/**/*.{cpp,h} ../lld/**/*.{cpp,h} llvm-svn: 366177
* [Sema] Diagnose default-initialization, destruction, and copying ofAkira Hatanaka2019-07-132-0/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | non-trivial C union types This patch diagnoses uses of non-trivial C unions and structs/unions containing non-trivial C unions in the following contexts, which require default-initialization, destruction, or copying of the union objects, instead of disallowing fields of non-trivial types in C unions, which is what we currently do: - function parameters. - function returns. - assignments. - compound literals. - block captures except capturing of `__block` variables by non-escaping blocks. - local and global variable definitions. - lvalue-to-rvalue conversions of volatile types. See the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D62988 for more background. rdar://problem/50679094 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63753 llvm-svn: 365985
* [Concepts] Concept definitions (D40381)Saar Raz2019-07-104-0/+19
| | | | | | | First in a series of patches to land C++2a Concepts support. This patch adds AST and parsing support for concept-declarations. llvm-svn: 365699
* [Bitcode] Move Bitstream to a separate libraryFrancis Visoiu Mistrih2019-07-0310-11/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This moves Bitcode/Bitstream*, Bitcode/BitCodes.h to Bitstream/. This is needed to avoid a circular dependency when using the bitstream code for parsing optimization remarks. Since Bitcode uses Core for the IR part: libLLVMRemarks -> Bitcode -> Core and Core uses libLLVMRemarks to generate remarks (see IR/RemarkStreamer.cpp): Core -> libLLVMRemarks we need to separate the Bitstream and Bitcode part. For clang-doc, it seems that it doesn't need the whole bitcode layer, so I updated the CMake to only use the bitstream part. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63899 llvm-svn: 365091
* Change std::{lower,upper}_bound to llvm::{lower,upper}_bound or ↵Fangrui Song2019-07-032-7/+5
| | | | | | llvm::partition_point. NFC llvm-svn: 365006
* [C++2a] Add __builtin_bit_cast, used to implement std::bit_castErik Pilkington2019-07-022-0/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit adds a new builtin, __builtin_bit_cast(T, v), which performs a bit_cast from a value v to a type T. This expression can be evaluated at compile time under specific circumstances. The compile time evaluation currently doesn't support bit-fields, but I'm planning on fixing this in a follow up (some of the logic for figuring this out is in CodeGen). I'm also planning follow-ups for supporting some more esoteric types that the constexpr evaluator supports, as well as extending __builtin_memcpy constexpr evaluation to use the same infrastructure. rdar://44987528 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62825 llvm-svn: 364954
* BitStream reader: propagate errorsJF Bastien2019-06-264-241/+741
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The bitstream reader handles errors poorly. This has two effects: * Bugs in file handling (especially modules) manifest as an "unexpected end of file" crash * Users of clang as a library end up aborting because the code unconditionally calls `report_fatal_error` The bitstream reader should be more resilient and return Expected / Error as soon as an error is encountered, not way late like it does now. This patch starts doing so and adopting the error handling where I think it makes sense. There's plenty more to do: this patch propagates errors to be minimally useful, and follow-ups will propagate them further and improve diagnostics. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42311 <rdar://problem/33159405> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63518 llvm-svn: 364464
* [clang] Add storage for APValue in ConstantExprGauthier Harnisch2019-06-154-2/+140
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: When using ConstantExpr we often need the result of the expression to be kept in the AST. Currently this is done on a by the node that needs the result and has been done multiple times for enumerator, for constexpr variables... . This patch adds to ConstantExpr the ability to store the result of evaluating the expression. no functional changes expected. Changes: - Add trailling object to ConstantExpr that can hold an APValue or an uint64_t. the uint64_t is here because most ConstantExpr yield integral values so there is an optimized layout for integral values. - Add basic* serialization support for the trailing result. - Move conversion functions from an enum to a fltSemantics from clang::FloatingLiteral to llvm::APFloatBase. this change is to make it usable for serializing APValues. - Add basic* Import support for the trailing result. - ConstantExpr created in CheckConvertedConstantExpression now stores the result in the ConstantExpr Node. - Adapt AST dump to print the result when present. basic* : None, Indeterminate, Int, Float, FixedPoint, ComplexInt, ComplexFloat, the result is not yet used anywhere but for -ast-dump. Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik Reviewed By: rsmith Subscribers: rnkovacs, hiraditya, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits Tags: #clang, #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62399 llvm-svn: 363493
* [C++20] add Basic consteval specifierGauthier Harnisch2019-06-142-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: this revision adds Lexing, Parsing and Basic Semantic for the consteval specifier as specified by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1073r3.html with this patch, the consteval specifier is treated as constexpr but can only be applied to function declaration. Changes: - add the consteval keyword. - add parsing of consteval specifier for normal declarations and lambdas expressions. - add the whether a declaration is constexpr is now represented by and enum everywhere except for variable because they can't be consteval. - adapt diagnostic about constexpr to print constexpr or consteval depending on the case. - add tests for basic semantic. Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik Reviewed By: rsmith Subscribers: eraman, efriedma, rnkovacs, cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61790 llvm-svn: 363362
* For DR712: store on a MemberExpr whether it constitutes an odr-use.Richard Smith2019-06-112-0/+2
| | | | llvm-svn: 363087
* For DR712: store on a DeclRefExpr whether it constitutes an odr-use.Richard Smith2019-06-113-4/+7
| | | | | | | Begin restructuring to support the forms of non-odr-use reference permitted by DR712. llvm-svn: 363086
* Convert MemberExpr creation and serialization to work the same way asRichard Smith2019-06-062-76/+76
| | | | | | | | | | most / all other Expr subclasses. This reinstates r362551, reverted in r362597, with a fix to a bug that caused MemberExprs to sometimes have a null FoundDecl after a round-trip through an AST file. llvm-svn: 362756
* Revert "Factor out duplicated code building a MemberExpr and marking it" and ↵Benjamin Kramer2019-06-052-72/+76
| | | | | | | | "Convert MemberExpr creation and serialization to work the same way as" This reverts commits r362551 and r362563. Crashes during modules selfhost. llvm-svn: 362597
* Convert MemberExpr creation and serialization to work the same way asRichard Smith2019-06-042-76/+72
| | | | | | most / all other Expr subclasses. llvm-svn: 362551
* Re-check in clang support gun asm goto after fixing tests.Jennifer Yu2019-06-032-0/+11
| | | | llvm-svn: 362410
* Revert "clang support gnu asm goto."Erich Keane2019-05-302-11/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 954ec09aed4f2be04bb5f4e10dbb4ea8bd19ef9a. Reverting due to test failures as requested by Jennifer Yu. Conflicts: clang/test/CodeGen/asm-goto.c llvm-svn: 362106
* clang support gnu asm goto.Jennifer Yu2019-05-302-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Syntax: asm [volatile] goto ( AssemblerTemplate : : InputOperands : Clobbers : GotoLabels) https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html New llvm IR is "callbr" for inline asm goto instead "call" for inline asm For: asm goto("testl %0, %0; jne %l1;" :: "r"(cond)::label_true, loop); IR: callbr void asm sideeffect "testl $0, $0; jne ${1:l};", "r,X,X,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32 %0, i8* blockaddress(@foo, %label_true), i8* blockaddress(@foo, %loop)) #1 to label %asm.fallthrough [label %label_true, label %loop], !srcloc !3 asm.fallthrough: Compiler need to generate: 1> a dummy constarint 'X' for each label. 2> an unique fallthrough label for each asm goto stmt " asm.fallthrough%number". Diagnostic 1> duplicate asm operand name are used in output, input and label. 2> goto out of scope. llvm-svn: 362045
* Permit static local structured bindings to be named from arbitrary scopes ↵Richard Smith2019-05-251-1/+3
| | | | | | inside their declaring scope. llvm-svn: 361686
* Fix crash deserializing a CUDAKernelCallExpr with a +Asserts binary.Richard Smith2019-05-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | The assertion in setConfig read from the (uninitialized) CONFIG expression. llvm-svn: 361680
* [c++20] P0780R2: Support pack-expansion of init-captures.Richard Smith2019-05-213-5/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | This permits an init-capture to introduce a new pack: template<typename ...T> auto x = [...a = T()] { /* a is a pack */ }; To support this, the mechanism for allowing ParmVarDecls to be packs has been extended to support arbitrary local VarDecls. llvm-svn: 361300
* Implement __builtin_LINE() et. al. to support source location capture.Eric Fiselier2019-05-162-0/+26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This patch implements the source location builtins `__builtin_LINE(), `__builtin_FUNCTION()`, `__builtin_FILE()` and `__builtin_COLUMN()`. These builtins are needed to implement [`std::experimental::source_location`](https://rawgit.com/cplusplus/fundamentals-ts/v2/main.html#reflection.src_loc.creation). With the exception of `__builtin_COLUMN`, GCC also implements these builtins, and Clangs behavior is intended to match as closely as possible. Reviewers: rsmith, joerg, aaron.ballman, bogner, majnemer, shafik, martong Reviewed By: rsmith Subscribers: rnkovacs, loskutov, riccibruno, mgorny, kunitoki, alexr, majnemer, hfinkel, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37035 llvm-svn: 360937
* PR41845: Detect and reject mismatched inner/outer pack expansion sizesRichard Smith2019-05-132-0/+2
| | | | | | in fold expressions rather than crashing. llvm-svn: 360563
* [c++20] Add support for explicit(bool), as described in P0892R2.Richard Smith2019-05-093-15/+19
| | | | | | | | Patch by Tyker! Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934 llvm-svn: 360311
* [c++20] Implement P0846R0: allow (ADL-only) calls to template-ids whoseRichard Smith2019-05-092-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | template name is not visible to unqualified lookup. In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the template name finds nothing. Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id. Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its point of use. The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but no function templates) is enabled in all language modes. llvm-svn: 360308
* Recommit r359859 "[Attribute/Diagnostics] Print macro if definition is an ↵Leonard Chan2019-05-072-0/+25
| | | | | | | | attribute declaration" Updated with fix for read of uninitialized memory. llvm-svn: 360109
* Revert r359949 "[clang] adding explicit(bool) from c++2a"Hans Wennborg2019-05-063-19/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This caused Clang to start erroring on the following: struct S {   template <typename = int> explicit S(); }; struct T : S {}; struct U : T {   U(); }; U::U() {} $ clang -c /tmp/x.cc /tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T' U::U() {}    ^ /tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted because base class 'S' has no default constructor struct T : S {};            ^ 1 error generated. See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread. This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968. > this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier. > > Changes: > - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp. > - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class. > - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted. > - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration. > - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected. > - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added. > > This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback. > Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky. > > Patch by Tyker > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934 llvm-svn: 360024
* [clang] adding explicit(bool) from c++2aNicolas Lesser2019-05-043-15/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier. Changes: - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp. - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class. - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted. - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration. - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected. - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added. This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback. Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky. Patch by Tyker Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934 llvm-svn: 359949
* Revert "[Attribute/Diagnostics] Print macro if definition is an attribute ↵Leonard Chan2019-05-032-25/+0
| | | | | | | | declaration" This reverts commit fc40cbd9d8c63e65eed3590ba925321afe782e1d. llvm-svn: 359859
* [Attribute/Diagnostics] Print macro if definition is an attribute declarationLeonard Chan2019-05-022-0/+25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | If an address_space attribute is defined in a macro, print the macro instead when diagnosing a warning or error for incompatible pointers with different address_spaces. We allow this for all attributes (not just address_space), and for multiple attributes declared in the same macro. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51329 llvm-svn: 359826
* Replace ad-hoc tracking of pattern for an instantiated class-scopeRichard Smith2019-05-022-7/+32
| | | | | | | | | | explicit function specialization with the MemberSpecializationInfo used everywhere else. Not NFC: the ad-hoc pattern tracking was not being serialized / deserialized properly. That's fixed here. llvm-svn: 359747
* [Serialization] Stable serialization order for OpenCLTypeExtMap and ↵Bruno Ricci2019-04-181-9/+45
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | OpenCLDeclExtMap Sort the elements of Sema::OpenCLTypeExtMap and Sema::OpenCLDeclExtMap by TypeIDs and DeclIDs to guarantee a stable serialization order. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60835 Reviewed By: Anastasia Reviewers: Anastasia, lebedev.ri llvm-svn: 358674
* Range-style std::find{,_if} -> llvm::find{,_if}. NFCFangrui Song2019-03-312-3/+2
| | | | llvm-svn: 357359
* Adds `-ftime-trace` option to clang that produces Chrome `chrome://tracing` ↵Anton Afanasyev2019-03-301-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | compatible JSON profiling output dumps. This change adds hierarchical "time trace" profiling blocks that can be visualized in Chrome, in a "flame chart" style. Each profiling block can have a "detail" string that for example indicates the file being processed, template name being instantiated, function being optimized etc. This is taken from GitHub PR: https://github.com/aras-p/llvm-project-20170507/pull/2 Patch by Aras Pranckevičius. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58675 llvm-svn: 357340
* [OPENMP]Initial support for 'allocate' clause.Alexey Bataev2019-03-272-0/+24
| | | | | | Added parsing/sema analysis of the allocate clause. llvm-svn: 357068
* [OPENMP]Improve detection of omp_allocator_handle_t type and predefinedAlexey Bataev2019-03-202-5/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | allocators. It is better to deduce omp_allocator_handle_t type from the predefined allocators, because omp.h header might not define it explicitly. Plus, it allows to identify the predefined allocators correctly when trying to build the allcoator for the global variables. llvm-svn: 356607
* [clang][OpeMP] Model OpenMP structured-block in AST (PR40563)Roman Lebedev2019-03-203-4/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf, page 3: ``` structured block For C/C++, an executable statement, possibly compound, with a single entry at the top and a single exit at the bottom, or an OpenMP construct. COMMENT: See Section 2.1 on page 38 for restrictions on structured blocks. ``` ``` 2.1 Directive Format Some executable directives include a structured block. A structured block: • may contain infinite loops where the point of exit is never reached; • may halt due to an IEEE exception; • may contain calls to exit(), _Exit(), quick_exit(), abort() or functions with a _Noreturn specifier (in C) or a noreturn attribute (in C/C++); • may be an expression statement, iteration statement, selection statement, or try block, provided that the corresponding compound statement obtained by enclosing it in { and } would be a structured block; and Restrictions Restrictions to structured blocks are as follows: • Entry to a structured block must not be the result of a branch. • The point of exit cannot be a branch out of the structured block. C / C++ • The point of entry to a structured block must not be a call to setjmp(). • longjmp() and throw() must not violate the entry/exit criteria. ``` Of particular note here is the fact that OpenMP structured blocks are as-if `noexcept`, in the same sense as with the normal `noexcept` functions in C++. I.e. if throw happens, and it attempts to travel out of the `noexcept` function (here: out of the current structured-block), then the program terminates. Now, one of course can say that since it is explicitly prohibited by the Specification, then any and all programs that violate this Specification contain undefined behavior, and are unspecified, and thus no one should care about them. Just don't write broken code /s But i'm not sure this is a reasonable approach. I have personally had oss-fuzz issues of this origin - exception thrown inside of an OpenMP structured-block that is not caught, thus causing program termination. This issue isn't all that hard to catch, it's not any particularly different from diagnosing the same situation with the normal `noexcept` function. Now, clang static analyzer does not presently model exceptions. But clang-tidy has a simplisic [[ https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-exception-escape.html | bugprone-exception-escape ]] check, and it is even refactored as a `ExceptionAnalyzer` class for reuse. So it would be trivial to use that analyzer to check for exceptions escaping out of OpenMP structured blocks. (D59466) All that sounds too great to be true. Indeed, there is a caveat. Presently, it's practically impossible to do. To check a OpenMP structured block you need to somehow 'get' the OpenMP structured block, and you can't because it's simply not modelled in AST. `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` is not it's representation. Now, it is of course possible to write e.g. some AST matcher that would e.g. match every OpenMP executable directive, and then return the whatever `Stmt` is the structured block of said executable directive, if any. But i said //practically//. This isn't practical for the following reasons: 1. This **will** bitrot. That matcher will need to be kept up-to-date, and refreshed with every new OpenMP spec version. 2. Every single piece of code that would want that knowledge would need to have such matcher. Well, okay, if it is an AST matcher, it could be shared. But then you still have `RecursiveASTVisitor` and friends. `2 > 1`, so now you have code duplication. So it would be reasonable (and is fully within clang AST spirit) to not force every single consumer to do that work, but instead store that knowledge in the correct, and appropriate place - AST, class structure. Now, there is another hoop we need to get through. It isn't fully obvious //how// to model this. The best solution would of course be to simply add a `OMPStructuredBlock` transparent node. It would be optimal, it would give us two properties: * Given this `OMPExecutableDirective`, what's it OpenMP structured block? * It is trivial to check whether the `Stmt*` is a OpenMP structured block (`isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`) But OpenMP structured block isn't **necessarily** the first, direct child of `OMP*Directive`. (even ignoring the clang's `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` that were inserted inbetween). So i'm not sure whether or not we could re-create AST statements after they were already created? There would be other costs to a new AST node: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563#c12 ``` 1. You will need to break the representation of loops. The body should be replaced by the "structured block" entity. 2. You will need to support serialization/deserialization. 3. You will need to support template instantiation. 4. You will need to support codegen and take this new construct to account in each OpenMP directive. ``` Instead, there **is** an functionally-equivalent, alternative solution, consisting of two parts. Part 1: * Add a member function `isStandaloneDirective()` to the `OMPExecutableDirective` class, that will tell whether this directive is stand-alone or not, as per the spec. We need it because we can't just check for the existance of associated statements, see code comment. * Add a member function `getStructuredBlock()` to the OMPExecutableDirective` class itself, that assert that this is not a stand-alone directive, and either return the correct loop body if this is a loop-like directive, or the captured statement. This way, given an `OMPExecutableDirective`, we can get it's structured block. Also, since the knowledge is ingrained into the clang OpenMP implementation, it will not cause any duplication, and //hopefully// won't bitrot. Great we achieved 1 of 2 properties of `OMPStructuredBlock` approach. Thus, there is a second part needed: * How can we check whether a given `Stmt*` is `OMPStructuredBlock`? Well, we can't really, in general. I can see this workaround: ``` class FunctionASTVisitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor> { using Base = RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor>; public: bool VisitOMPExecDir(OMPExecDir *D) { OmpStructuredStmts.emplace_back(D.getStructuredStmt()); } bool VisitSOMETHINGELSE(???) { if(InOmpStructuredStmt) HI! } bool TraverseStmt(Stmt *Node) { if (!Node) return Base::TraverseStmt(Node); if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node) ++InOmpStructuredStmt; Base::TraverseStmt(Node); if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node) { OmpStructuredStmts.pop_back(); --InOmpStructuredStmt; } return true; } std::vector<Stmt*> OmpStructuredStmts; int InOmpStructuredStmt = 0; }; ``` But i really don't see using it in practice. It's just too intrusive; and again, requires knowledge duplication. .. but no. The solution lies right on the ground. Why don't we simply store this `i'm a openmp structured block` in the bitfield of the `Stmt` itself? This does not appear to have any impact on the memory footprint of the clang AST, since it's just a single extra bit in the bitfield. At least the static assertions don't fail. Thus, indeed, we can achieve both of the properties without a new AST node. We can cheaply set that bit right in sema, at the end of `Sema::ActOnOpenMPExecutableDirective()`, by just calling the `getStructuredBlock()` that we just added. Test coverage that demonstrates all this has been added. This isn't as great with serialization though. Most of it does not use abbrevs, so we do end up paying the full price (4 bytes?) instead of a single bit. That price, of course, can be reclaimed by using abbrevs. In fact, i suspect that //might// not just reclaim these bytes, but pack these PCH significantly. I'm not seeing a third solution. If there is one, it would be interesting to hear about it. ("just don't write code that would require `isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`" is not a solution.) Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563 | PR40563 ]]. Reviewers: ABataev, rjmccall, hfinkel, rsmith, riccibruno, gribozavr Reviewed By: ABataev, gribozavr Subscribers: mgorny, aaron.ballman, steveire, guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits Tags: #clang, #openmp Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214 llvm-svn: 356570
* [NFC][clang][PCH][ObjC] Add some missing `VisitStmt(S);`Roman Lebedev2019-03-122-3/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: These ObjC AST classes inherit from Stmt, but don't call `VisitStmt(S);`. Some were founded with help of existing tests (with `NumStmtFields` bumped to `1`), but some of them don't even have PCH test coverage. :/ Reviewers: arphaman, sammccall, smeenai, aprantl, rsmith, jordan_rose Reviewed By: jordan_rose Subscribers: cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59197 llvm-svn: 355987
* [OPENMP 5.0]Initial support for 'allocator' clause.Alexey Bataev2019-03-124-4/+32
| | | | | | | Added parsing/sema analysis/serialization/deserialization for the 'allocator' clause of the 'allocate' directive. llvm-svn: 355952
* Modules: Add LangOptions::CacheGeneratedPCHDuncan P. N. Exon Smith2019-03-122-5/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | Add an option to cache the generated PCH in the ModuleCache when emitting it. This protects clients that build PCHs and read them in the same process, allowing them to avoid race conditions between parallel jobs the same way that Clang's implicit module build system does. rdar://problem/48740787 llvm-svn: 355950
* Modules: Invalidate out-of-date PCMs as they're discoveredDuncan P. N. Exon Smith2019-03-094-36/+87
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Leverage the InMemoryModuleCache to invalidate a module the first time it fails to import (and to lock a module as soon as it's built or imported successfully). For implicit module builds, this optimizes importing deep graphs where the leaf module is out-of-date; see example near the end of the commit message. Previously the cache finalized ("locked in") all modules imported so far when starting a new module build. This was sufficient to prevent loading two versions of the same module, but was somewhat arbitrary and hard to reason about. Now the cache explicitly tracks module state, where each module must be one of: - Unknown: module not in the cache (yet). - Tentative: module in the cache, but not yet fully imported. - ToBuild: module found on disk could not be imported; need to build. - Final: module in the cache has been successfully built or imported. Preventing repeated failed imports avoids variation in builds based on shifting filesystem state. Now it's guaranteed that a module is loaded from disk exactly once. It now seems safe to remove FileManager::invalidateCache, but I'm leaving that for a later commit. The new, precise logic uncovered a pre-existing problem in the cache: the map key is the module filename, and different contexts use different filenames for the same PCM file. (In particular, the test Modules/relative-import-path.c does not build without this commit. r223577 started using a relative path to describe a module's base directory when importing it within another module. As a result, the module cache sees an absolute path when (a) building the module or importing it at the top-level, and a relative path when (b) importing the module underneath another one.) The "obvious" fix is to resolve paths using FileManager::getVirtualFile and change the map key for the cache to a FileEntry, but some contexts (particularly related to ASTUnit) have a shorter lifetime for their FileManager than the InMemoryModuleCache. This is worth pursuing further in a later commit; perhaps by tying together the FileManager and InMemoryModuleCache lifetime, or moving the in-memory PCM storage into a VFS layer. For now, use the PCM's base directory as-written for constructing the filename to check the ModuleCache. Example ======= To understand the build optimization, first consider the build of a module graph TU -> A -> B -> C -> D with an empty cache: TU builds A' A' builds B' B' builds C' C' builds D' imports D' B' imports C' imports D' A' imports B' imports C' imports D' TU imports A' imports B' imports C' imports D' If we build TU again, where A, B, C, and D are in the cache and D is out-of-date, we would previously get this build: TU imports A imports B imports C imports D (out-of-date) TU builds A' A' imports B imports C imports D (out-of-date) builds B' B' imports C imports D (out-of-date) builds C' C' imports D (out-of-date) builds D' imports D' B' imports C' imports D' A' imports B' imports C' imports D' TU imports A' imports B' imports C' imports D' After this commit, we'll immediateley invalidate A, B, C, and D when we first observe that D is out-of-date, giving this build: TU imports A imports B imports C imports D (out-of-date) TU builds A' // The same graph as an empty cache. A' builds B' B' builds C' C' builds D' imports D' B' imports C' imports D' A' imports B' imports C' imports D' TU imports A' imports B' imports C' imports D' The new build matches what we'd naively expect, pretty closely matching the original build with the empty cache. rdar://problem/48545366 llvm-svn: 355778
* Modules: Rename MemoryBufferCache to InMemoryModuleCacheDuncan P. N. Exon Smith2019-03-096-31/+83
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Change MemoryBufferCache to InMemoryModuleCache, moving it from Basic to Serialization. Another patch will start using it to manage module build more explicitly, but this is split out because it's mostly mechanical. Because of the move to Serialization we can no longer abuse the Preprocessor to forward it to the ASTReader. Besides the rename and file move, that means Preprocessor::Preprocessor has one fewer parameter and ASTReader::ASTReader has one more. llvm-svn: 355777
* [OPENMP 5.0]Add initial support for 'allocate' directive.Alexey Bataev2019-03-075-2/+47
| | | | | | | Added parsing/sema analysis/serialization/deserialization support for 'allocate' directive. llvm-svn: 355614
* Modules: Add -Rmodule-importDuncan P. N. Exon Smith2019-03-061-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a remark for importing modules. Depending on whether this is a direct import (into the TU being built by this compiler instance) or transitive import (into an already-imported module), the diagnostic has two forms: importing module 'Foo' from 'path/to/Foo.pcm' importing module 'Foo' into 'Bar' from 'path/to/Foo.pcm' Also drop a redundant FileCheck invocation in Rmodule-build.m that was using -Reverything, since the notes from -Rmodule-import were confusing it. https://reviews.llvm.org/D58891 llvm-svn: 355477
* Modules: Document that ReadASTCore exits its final loop via `return`, NFCDuncan P. N. Exon Smith2019-03-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | The final loop never breaks. Document that by following it with llvm_unreachable. llvm-svn: 355294
* Avoid needlessly copying a block to the heap when a block literalAkira Hatanaka2019-02-272-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | initializes a local auto variable or is assigned to a local auto variable that is declared in the scope that introduced the block literal. rdar://problem/13289333 https://reviews.llvm.org/D58514 llvm-svn: 355012
* [OpenMP 5.0] Parsing/sema support for from clause with mapper modifier.Michael Kruse2019-02-252-0/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch implements the parsing and sema support for the OpenMP 'from'-clause with potential user-defined mappers attached. User-defined mappers are a new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A 'from'-clause can have an explicit or implicit associated mapper, which instructs the compiler to generate and use customized mapping functions. An example is shown below: struct S { int len; int *d; }; #pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len]) struct S ss; #pragma omp target update from(mapper(id): ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss from device Contributed-by: Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58638 llvm-svn: 354817
* [OpenMP 5.0] Parsing/sema support for to clause with mapper modifier.Michael Kruse2019-02-222-0/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch implements the parsing and sema support for OpenMP to clause with potential user-defined mappers attached. User defined mapper is a new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A to/from clause can have an explicit or implicit associated mapper, which instructs the compiler to generate and use customized mapping functions. An example is shown below: struct S { int len; int *d; }; #pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len]) struct S ss; #pragma omp target update to(mapper(id): ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss to device Contributed-by: <lildmh@gmail.com> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58523 llvm-svn: 354698
* [OpenMP 5.0] Parsing/sema support for map clause with mapper modifier.Michael Kruse2019-02-192-30/+44
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch implements the parsing and sema support for OpenMP map clauses with potential user-defined mapper attached. User defined mapper is a new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A map clause can have an explicit or implicit associated mapper, which instructs the compiler to generate extra data mapping. An example is shown below: struct S { int len; int *d; }; #pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len]) struct S ss; #pragma omp target map(mapper(id) tofrom: ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss Contributed-by: Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58074 llvm-svn: 354347
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud