| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
...that have already been constructed (e.g., in inner classes) while parsing the
class definition. They would otherwise lack any DLLAttr inherited from the
class, which are only set here (called from Sema::CheckCompletedClass) after the
class definition has been parsed completely.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D16632
llvm-svn: 326990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts r326965. It seems to have caused repeating test failures in
clang/test/Sema/diagnose_if.c on some buildbots.
I cannot reproduce the problem, and it's not immediately obvious what
the problem is, so let's revert to green.
llvm-svn: 326974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
template parameter that is an expanded parameter pack, only substitute into the
current slice, not the entire pack.
This reduces the checking of N template template arguments for an expanded
parameter pack containing N parameters from quadratic time to linear time in
the length of the pack. This is important because one (and possibly the only?)
general technique for splitting a template parameter pack in linear time
depends on doing this.
llvm-svn: 326973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Before this patch, Sema pre-allocated a FunctionScopeInfo and kept it in
the first, always present element of the FunctionScopes stack. This
meant that Sema::getCurFunction would return a pointer to this
pre-allocated object when parsing code outside a function body. This is
pretty much always a bug, so this patch moves the pre-allocated object
into a separate unique_ptr. This should make bugs like PR36536 a lot
more obvious.
As you can see from this patch, there were a number of places that
unconditionally assumed they were always called inside a function.
However, there are also many places that null checked the result of
getCurFunction(), so I think this is a reasonable direction.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44039
llvm-svn: 326965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This provides no measurable build speedup, but it reinstates an
optimization from r112038 that was lost in r179618. It requires moving
CapturedScopeInfo::Capture out to clang::sema, which might be too
general since we have plenty of other Capture records in BlockDecl and
other AST nodes.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44221
llvm-svn: 326957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is PR36536.
There are a few ways to reach Sema::ActOnStartOfFunctionDef with a null
Decl. Currently, the parser continues on to attempt to parse the
statements in the function body without pushing a function scope or
declaration context. However, lots of statement parsing logic relies on
getCurFunction() returning something reasonable. It turns out that
getCurFunction() will never return null today because of an optimization
where Sema pre-allocates one FunctionScopeInfo and reuses it when
possible. This goes wrong when something inside the function body causes
us to push another function scope, such as requiring an implicit
definition of a special member function. Reusing the state clears it
out, which will lead to bugs. In PR36536, we found that the SwitchStack
gets unbalanced, because we push a switch, clear out the stack, and then
try to pop a switch that isn't there.
As a follow-up, I plan to move the pre-allocated FunctionScopeInfo out
of the FunctionScopes stack. This means the FunctionScopes stack will
often be empty, and callers of getCurFunction() will need to check for
null.
Reviewers: thakis
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43980
llvm-svn: 326926
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 326862
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 326741
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These attributes were only customized because of the need to check for attribute mutual exclusion, but we now have the handleSimpleAttributeWithExclusions() helper function to handle these scenarios.
llvm-svn: 326675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
checking logic.
This changes the diagnostic wording somewhat, but otherwise intends no functional change to the attribute.
llvm-svn: 326665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch fixes a number of bugs related to parameter indexing in
attributes:
* Parameter indices in some attributes (argument_with_type_tag,
pointer_with_type_tag, nonnull, ownership_takes, ownership_holds,
and ownership_returns) are specified in source as one-origin
including any C++ implicit this parameter, were stored as
zero-origin excluding any this parameter, and were erroneously
printing (-ast-print) and confusingly dumping (-ast-dump) as the
stored values.
* For alloc_size, the C++ implicit this parameter was not subtracted
correctly in Sema, leading to assert failures or to silent failures
of __builtin_object_size to compute a value.
* For argument_with_type_tag, pointer_with_type_tag, and
ownership_returns, the C++ implicit this parameter was not added
back to parameter indices in some diagnostics.
This patch fixes the above bugs and aims to prevent similar bugs in
the future by introducing careful mechanisms for handling parameter
indices in attributes. ParamIdx stores a parameter index and is
designed to hide the stored encoding while providing accessors that
require each use (such as printing) to make explicit the encoding that
is needed. Attribute declarations declare parameter index arguments
as [Variadic]ParamIdxArgument, which are exposed as ParamIdx[*]. This
patch rewrites all attribute arguments that are processed by
checkFunctionOrMethodParameterIndex in SemaDeclAttr.cpp to be declared
as [Variadic]ParamIdxArgument. The only exception is xray_log_args's
argument, which is encoded as a count not an index.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43248
llvm-svn: 326602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In CUDA mode all local variables are actually thread
local|threadprivate, not private, and, thus, they cannot be shared
between threads|lanes.
llvm-svn: 326590
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 326531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes it easier to debug crashes and hangs in block functions since
users can easily find out where the block is called from. The option
doesn't disable tail-calls from non-escaping blocks since non-escaping
blocks are not as hard to debug as escaping blocks.
rdar://problem/35758207
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43841
llvm-svn: 326530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Re-applying r326501.)
When parsing comments, for example, for -Wdocumentation, slightly different
behaviour occurs when -fparse-all-comments is specified. However, these
differences are subtle:
1. All comments are saved during parsing, regardless of whether they are doc
comments or not.
2. "Maybe-doc" comments, like <, !, etc, are saved as such, instead of marking
them as ordinary comments. The maybe-doc type of comment is never saved
otherwise. (Warning on these is the impetus of -Wdocumentation.)
3. All comments are treated as doc comments in ASTContext, even if they are ordinary.
This change moves the logic for checking CommentOptions.ParseAllComments closer
to where it has an effect. The overall logic is unchanged, but checks of the
ParseAllComments flag are now done where the effect will be clearer.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
llvm-svn: 326512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Original change:
[NFC] Move CommentOpts checks to the call sites that depend on it.
When parsing comments, for example, for -Wdocumentation, slightly different
behaviour occurs when -fparse-all-comments is specified. However, these
differences are subtle:
1. All comments are saved during parsing, regardless of whether they are doc comments or not.
2. "Maybe-doc" comments, like //<, //!, etc, are saved as such, instead of marking them as ordinary comments. The maybe-doc type of comment is never saved otherwise. (Warning on these is the impetus of -Wdocumentation.)
3. All comments are treated as doc comments in ASTContext, even if they are ordinary.
This change moves the logic for checking CommentOptions.ParseAllComments closer
to where it has an effect. The overall logic is unchanged, but checks of the
ParseAllComments flag are now done where the effect will be clearer.
llvm-svn: 326508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When parsing comments, for example, for -Wdocumentation, slightly different
behaviour occurs when -fparse-all-comments is specified. However, these
differences are subtle:
1. All comments are saved during parsing, regardless of whether they are doc
comments or not.
2. "Maybe-doc" comments, like //<, //!, etc, are saved as such, instead of
marking them as ordinary comments. The maybe-doc type of comment is never
saved otherwise. (Warning on these is the impetus of -Wdocumentation.)
3. All comments are treated as doc comments in ASTContext, even if they are
ordinary.
This change moves the logic for checking CommentOptions.ParseAllComments closer
to where it has an effect. The overall logic is unchanged, but checks of the
ParseAllComments flag are now done where the effect will be clearer.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43663
llvm-svn: 326501
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
if the other definition is a merged copy of the same function.
llvm-svn: 326496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current implementation of `FunctionDecl::isDefined` does not take into
account redeclarations that do not have bodies, but the bodies can be
instantiated from corresponding templated definition. This behavior does
not allow to detect function redefinition in the cases where friend
functions is defined in class templates. For instance, the code:
```
template<typename T> struct X { friend void f() {} };
X<int> xi;
void f() {}
```
compiles successfully but must fail due to redefinition of `f`. The
declaration of the friend `f` is created when the containing template
`X` is instantiated, but it does not have a body as per 14.5.4p4
because `f` is not odr-used.
With this change the function `Sema::CheckForFunctionRedefinition`
considers functions with uninstantiated bodies as definitions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30170
llvm-svn: 326419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ARC mode.
Declaring __strong pointer fields in structs was not allowed in
Objective-C ARC until now because that would make the struct non-trivial
to default-initialize, copy/move, and destroy, which is not something C
was designed to do. This patch lifts that restriction.
Special functions for non-trivial C structs are synthesized that are
needed to default-initialize, copy/move, and destroy the structs and
manage the ownership of the objects the __strong pointer fields point
to. Non-trivial structs passed to functions are destructed in the callee
function.
rdar://problem/33599681
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41228
llvm-svn: 326307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
template specialization types.
Specifically, we would not properly parse these types within template arguments
(for non-type template parameters), and in tentative parses. Fixing both of
these essentially requires that we parse deduced template specialization types
as types in all contexts, even in template argument lists -- in particular,
tentative parsing may look ahead and annotate a deduced template specialization
type before we figure out that we're actually supposed to treat the tokens as a
template-name. We deal with this by simply permitting deduced template
specialization types when parsing template arguments, and converting them to
template template arguments.
llvm-svn: 326299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the mapped type is non-trivial, the warning message is emitted for
better user experience.
llvm-svn: 326251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If several member expressions are mapped and they reference the same
address as a base, but access different members, this must be allowed.
llvm-svn: 326212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix for PR32992. Static const classes not exported.
Patch by zahiraam!
(This re-lands the commit, but using S.MarkVariableReferenced instead of
S.PendingInstantiations.push_back, and with an additional test.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42968
llvm-svn: 326089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
using a 1-based index instead of a 0-based index for consistency.
Patch by Joel Denny.
llvm-svn: 326058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
function the attribute appertains to is variadic.
Patch by Joel Denny.
llvm-svn: 326057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(argument_with_type_tag, pointer_with_type_tag, and type_tag_for_datatype) in the clang vendor namespace.
The TypeTagForDatatype attribute had custom parsing rules that previously prevented it from being supported with square bracket notation. The ArgumentWithTypeTag attribute previously had unnecessary custom parsing that could be handled declaratively.
llvm-svn: 326052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This ensures that any availability attributes are attached to the
category before the availability for the referenced protocols is checked.
rdar://37829755
llvm-svn: 325994
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 325834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This typo would cause an attempt to multiversion 'main' to issue an
error, but not mark the function as invalid. This patch fixes it.
llvm-svn: 325716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
According to [dcl.init.list]p7:
A narrowing conversion is an implicit conversion
- ...
- from an integer type or unscoped enumeration type to a
floating-point type, except where the source is a constant
expression and the actual value after conversion will fit into
the target type and will produce the original value when
converted back to the original type, or
- ...
Currently clang does not handle the 'unscoped enumeration' case. This
patch fixes the corresponding check.
Reviewers: faisalv, rsmith, rogfer01
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Subscribers: rogfer01, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42545
llvm-svn: 325668
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 325659
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
triggers class template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 325646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This function did a lot of 'Diag, return true' stuff. This resulted in needing
to introduce scopes in quite a few places. This patch replaces useages of a
single "S.Diag" followed by return true with simply "return S.Diag".
llvm-svn: 325633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Multiversioning SEMA failed to set the declaration as invalid on unsupported
targets. This patch does that.
Additionally, I noticed that there is no test to validate this error message.
This patch adds one, and uses 'mips' as the test architecture.
llvm-svn: 325610
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 325553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reimplement the "noexcept function actually throws" warning to properly handle
nested try-blocks. In passing, change 'throw;' handling to treat any enclosing
try block as being sufficient to suppress the warning rather than requiring a
'catch (...)'; the warning is intended to be conservatively-correct.
llvm-svn: 325545
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 325544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CodeCompletionContext had declarations of field and enum inside, both named 'Kind'.
It caused gcc 4.8 to give an incorrent warning when refering to enum as
`enum CodeCompletionContext::Kind`.
Avoid that warning by renaming the private field to CCKind.
llvm-svn: 325496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Will be used in clangd. See D43377.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43379
llvm-svn: 325490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constructs.
The compiler may emit some extra warnings for functions, that are
implicit specialization of the templates, declared in the target region.
llvm-svn: 325391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Compiler erroneously returned wrong data-sharing attributes for the
constant variables if they have explictly specified attributes.
llvm-svn: 325373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There were a few issues previously with the target
attribute diagnostics implementation that lead to the
attribute being added to the AST despite having an error
in it.
This patch changes that, and adds a test to ensure it
does not get added to the AST.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43359
llvm-svn: 325364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This broke the Chromium build, see https://crbug.com/813017
> accessibility of a class member.
>
> This fixes PR32898.
>
> rdar://problem/33737747
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36918
llvm-svn: 325335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
accessibility of a class member.
This fixes PR32898.
rdar://problem/33737747
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36918
llvm-svn: 325321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
depend sink|source clause.
Patch fixes compiler crash on standalone #pragmas ordered with
depend(sink|source) clauses.
llvm-svn: 325302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D42605.
An implementation of the behavior described in `[dcl.fct.def.coroutine]/7`:
when a promise type overloads `operator new` using a "placement new"
that takes the same argument types as the coroutine function, that
overload is used when allocating the coroutine frame.
Simply passing references to the coroutine function parameters directly
to `operator new` results in invariant violations in LLVM's coroutine
splitting pass, so this implementation modifies Clang codegen to
produce allocator-specific alloc/store/loads for each parameter being
forwarded to the allocator.
Test Plan: `check-clang`
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, eric_niebler
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: lewissbaker, EricWF, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42606
llvm-svn: 325291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Many methods in Sema take a `bool Diagnose` parameter. Examples of such
methods include `Sema::FindDeallocationFunction` and
`Sema::SpecialMemberIsTrivial`. Calling these methods with
`Diagnose = false` allows callers to, for instance, check for the
existence of a deallocation function, without that check resulting in
error diagnostics being emitted if no matching deallocation function exists.
Add a similar `bool Diagnose` to the `Sema::FindAllocationFunctions`
method, so that checks for the existence of allocation functions can be
made without triggering error diagnostics.
This allows `SemaCoroutine.cpp`, in its implementation of the
Coroutines TS, to check for the existence of a particular `operator new`
overload, but then without error fall back to a default `operator new`
if no matching overload exists.
Test Plan: `check-clang`
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, eric_niebler
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42605
llvm-svn: 325288
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
happened.
llvm-svn: 325261
|