| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. Make the warning more strict in C mode. r172696 added code to suppress
warnings from macro expansions in system headers, which checks
`SourceMgr.isMacroBodyExpansion(E->IgnoreParens()->getExprLoc())`. Consider
this snippet:
#define FOO(x) (x)
void f(int a) {
FOO(a);
}
In C, the line `FOO(a)` is an `ImplicitCastExpr(ParenExpr(DeclRefExpr))`,
while it's just a `ParenExpr(DeclRefExpr)` in C++. So in C++,
`E->IgnoreParens()` returns the `DeclRefExpr` and the check tests the
SourceLoc of `a`. In C, the `ImplicitCastExpr` has the effect of checking the
SourceLoc of `FOO`, which is a macro body expansion, which causes the
diagnostic to be skipped. It looks unintentional that clang does different
things for C and C++ here, so use `IgnoreParenImpCasts` instead of
`IgnoreParens` here. This has the effect of the warning firing more often
than previously in C code – it now fires as often as it fires in C++ code.
2. Suppress the warning if it would warn on `UNREFERENCED_PARAMETER`.
`UNREFERENCED_PARAMETER` is a commonly used macro on Windows and it happens
to uselessly trigger -Wunused-value. As discussed in the thread
"rfc: winnt.h's UNREFERENCED_PARAMETER() vs clang's -Wunused-value" on
cfe-dev, fix this by special-casing this specific macro. (This costs a string
comparison and some fast-path lexing per warning, but the warning is emitted
rarely. It fires once in Windows.h itself, so this code runs at least once
per TU including Windows.h, but it doesn't run hundreds of times.)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13969
llvm-svn: 251441
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
hopefully make bots happy again.
llvm-svn: 251397
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of await_* calls, and AST representation for same.
llvm-svn: 251387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
allow them to be written in certain kinds of user declaration and
diagnose on the use-site instead.
Also, improve and fix some diagnostics relating to __weak and
properties.
rdar://23228631
llvm-svn: 251384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
In `MismatchingNewDeleteDetector::analyzeInClassInitializer`, if
`Field`'s initializer expression is null, lookup the field in
implicit instantiation, and use found field's the initializer.
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9898
llvm-svn: 251335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, __weak was silently accepted and ignored in MRC mode.
That makes this a potentially source-breaking change that we have to
roll out cautiously. Accordingly, for the time being, actual support
for __weak references in MRC is experimental, and the compiler will
reject attempts to actually form such references. The intent is to
eventually enable the feature by default in all non-GC modes.
(It is, of course, incompatible with ObjC GC's interpretation of
__weak.)
If you like, you can enable this feature with
-Xclang -fobjc-weak
but like any -Xclang option, this option may be removed at any point,
e.g. if/when it is eventually enabled by default.
This patch also enables the use of the ARC __unsafe_unretained qualifier
in MRC. Unlike __weak, this is being enabled immediately. Since
variables are essentially __unsafe_unretained by default in MRC,
the only practical uses are (1) communication and (2) changing the
default behavior of by-value block capture.
As an implementation matter, this means that the ObjC ownership
qualifiers may appear in any ObjC language mode, and so this patch
removes a number of checks for getLangOpts().ObjCAutoRefCount
that were guarding the processing of these qualifiers. I don't
expect this to be a significant drain on performance; it may even
be faster to just check for these qualifiers directly on a type
(since it's probably in a register anyway) than to do N dependent
loads to grab the LangOptions.
rdar://9674298
llvm-svn: 251041
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
yield / return.
llvm-svn: 250993
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 250991
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
range-based for loop. NFC
llvm-svn: 250990
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
offsetof handling code. Also use a range-based for loop. NFC
llvm-svn: 250989
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
loop. NFC
llvm-svn: 250988
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
that uses back().
llvm-svn: 250970
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No functionality change is intended.
llvm-svn: 250935
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 250917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
headers. If those headers end up being textually included twice into the same
module, we get ambiguity errors.
Work around this by downgrading the ambiguity error to a warning if multiple
identical internal-linkage functions appear in an overload set, and just pick
one of those functions as the lookup result.
llvm-svn: 250884
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 250876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This time, I went with the first approach from
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6700, where clang actually attempts to form an
implicit member reference from an UnresolvedLookupExpr. We know that
there are only two possible outcomes at this point, a DeclRefExpr of the
FieldDecl or an error, but its safer to reuse the existing machinery for
this.
llvm-svn: 250856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as an extension
Microsoft's ATL headers make use of this MSVC extension, add support for
it and issue a diagnostic under -Wmicrosoft-exception-spec.
This fixes PR25265.
llvm-svn: 250854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clang will now accept this valid C++11 code:
struct A { int field; };
struct B : A {
using A::field;
enum { TheSize = sizeof(field) };
};
Previously we would classify the 'field' reference as something other
than a field, and then forget to apply the C++11 rule to allow
non-static data member references in unevaluated contexts.
This usually arises in class templates that want to reference fields of
a dependent base in an unevaluated context outside of an instance
method. Such contexts do not allow references to 'this', so the only way
to access the field is with a using decl and an implicit member
reference.
llvm-svn: 250839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: It breaks the build for the ASTMatchers
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13893
llvm-svn: 250827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Replace empty bodies of default constructors and destructors with '= default'.
Reviewers: bkramer, klimek
Subscribers: klimek, alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13890
llvm-svn: 250822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
static methods"
This reverts commit r250592.
It has issues around unevaluated contexts, like this:
template <class T> struct A { T i; };
template <class T>
struct B : A<T> {
using A<T>::i;
typedef decltype(i) U;
};
template struct B<int>;
llvm-svn: 250774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
emacs mode marker. (Changes left behind from another patch that ended up not
working out.)
llvm-svn: 250666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
methods
During the initial template parse for this code, 'member' is unresolved
and we don't know anything about it:
struct A { int member };
template <typename T>
struct B : public T {
using T::member;
static void f() {
(void)member; // Could be static or non-static.
}
};
template class B<A>;
The pattern declaration contains an UnresolvedLookupExpr rather than an
UnresolvedMemberExpr because `f` is static, and `member` should never be
a field. However, if the code is invalid, it may become a field, in
which case we should diagnose it.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6700
llvm-svn: 250592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, our logic when taking the address of an overloaded function
would not consider enable_if attributes, so long as all of the enable_if
conditions on a given candidate were true. So, two functions with
identical signatures (one with enable_if attributes, the other without),
would be considered equally good overloads. If we were calling the
function instead of taking its address, then the function with enable_if
attributes would be preferred.
This patch makes us prefer the candidate with enable_if regardless of if
we're calling or taking the address of an overloaded function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13795
llvm-svn: 250486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
invocations of foo() when compiling foo()->propertyName
Removes extra codegen for base expression of MS property call
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13375
llvm-svn: 250265
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
extensions as continuation of the class interface.
llvm-svn: 250250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
context (but otherwise at the top level) to be disabled, to support use of C++
standard library implementations that (legitimately) mark their <blah.h>
headers as being C++ headers from C libraries that wrap things in 'extern "C"'
a bit too enthusiastically.
llvm-svn: 250137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a bug where one can take the address of a conditionally
enabled function to drop its enable_if guards. For example:
int foo(int a) __attribute__((enable_if(a > 0, "")));
int (*p)(int) = &foo;
int result = p(-1); // compilation succeeds; calls foo(-1)
Overloading logic has been updated to reflect this change, as well.
Functions with enable_if attributes that are always true are still
allowed to have their address taken.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13607
llvm-svn: 250090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixed a bug where we'd emit multiple diagnostics if there was a problem
taking the address of an overloaded template function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13664
llvm-svn: 250078
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 249997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
C allows for some implicit conversions that C++ does not, e.g. void* ->
char*. This patch teaches clang that these conversions are okay when
dealing with overloads in C.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13604
llvm-svn: 249995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is important to keep the information in IDE or other tools
even if the code contains a few errors
llvm-svn: 249982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The inference of _Nullable for weak Objective-C properties was broken
in several ways:
* It was back-patching the type information very late in the process
of checking the attributes for an Objective-C property, which is
just wrong.
* It was using ad hoc checks to try to suppress the warning about
missing nullability specifiers (-Wnullability-completeness), which
didn't actual work in all cases (rdar://problem/22985457)
* It was inferring _Nullable even outside of assumes-nonnull regions,
which is wrong.
Putting the inference of _Nullable for weak Objective-C properties in
the same place as all of the other inference logic fixes all of these
ills.
llvm-svn: 249896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
like __ and ____.
Patch by Adrian Zgorzalek!
llvm-svn: 249833
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 249801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Currently when a function annotated with __attribute__((nonnull)) is called in an unevaluated context with a null argument a -Wnonnull warning is emitted.
This warning seems like a false positive unless the call expression is potentially evaluated. Change this behavior so that the non-null warnings use DiagRuntimeBehavior so they wont emit when they won't be evaluated.
Reviewers: majnemer, rsmith
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13408
llvm-svn: 249787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
GNU-style formatting that involves prefix and suffix underscores. Cleans up other usages of similar functionality.
Patch by Adrian Zgorzalek!
llvm-svn: 249721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
consider the following:
enum E *p;
enum E { e };
The above snippet is not ANSI C because 'enum E' has not bee defined
when we are processing the declaration of 'p'; however, it is a popular
extension to make the above work. This would fail using the Microsoft
enum semantics because the definition of 'E' would implicitly have a
fixed underlying type of 'int' which would trigger diagnostic messages
about a mismatch between the declaration and the definition.
Instead, treat fixed underlying types as not fixed for the purposes of
the diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 249674
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OpenMP 4.1 adds support for array sections/subscripts in 'reduction' clause. Patch adds codegen for this feature.
llvm-svn: 249672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Enums without an explicit, fixed, underlying type are implicitly given a
fixed 'int' type for ABI compatibility with MSVC. However, we can
enforce the standard-mandated rules on these types as-if we didn't know
this fact if the tag is not part of a definition.
llvm-svn: 249667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-fms-compatibility
No ABI for C++ currently makes it possible to implement the standard
100% perfectly. We wrongly hid some of our compatible behavior behind
-fms-compatibility instead of tying it to the compiler ABI.
llvm-svn: 249656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
minor cleanups
Patch by Eugene Zelenko!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13406
llvm-svn: 249484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
that change turns out to not be reasonable: mutating the AST of a parsed
template during instantiation is not a sound thing to do, does not work across
chained PCH / modules builds, and is in any case a special-case workaround to a
more general problem that should be solved centrally.
llvm-svn: 249342
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 249259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Diagnose when a pointer to const T is used as the first argument in at atomic
builtin unless that builtin is a load operation. This is already checked for
C11 atomics builtins but not for __atomic ones.
This patch was given the LGTM by rsmith when it was part
of a larger review. (See http://reviews.llvm.org/D10407)
llvm-svn: 249252
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
+couple more of double-negated !SourceLocation.isInvalid() unfixed in r249228.
llvm-svn: 249235
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SourceLocation.isValid().
llvm-svn: 249228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All global variables that are not enclosed in a declare target region
must be captured in the target region as local variables do. Currently,
there is no support for declare target, so this patch adds support for
capturing all the global variables used in a the target region.
llvm-svn: 249154
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a patch from Doug that was inadvertently omitted from r241543.
llvm-svn: 249116
|