| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We keep the "as written" storage class, but that is a fuzzy concept for
instantiations. With this patch instantiations of methods of class templates
now get a storage class that is based on the semantics of isStatic(). With this
can simplify isStatic() itself.
llvm-svn: 179521
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the AST.
llvm-svn: 179447
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 179151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-gdb went back green
before it processed the reverted 178663, so it could not have been the culprit.
Revert "Revert 178663."
This reverts commit 4f8a3eb2ce5d4ba422483439e20c8cbb4d953a41.
llvm-svn: 178682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Looks like it broke http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-gdb
Revert "Don't compute a patched/semantic storage class."
This reverts commit 8f187f62cb0487d31bc4afdfcd47e11fe9a51d05.
llvm-svn: 178681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For variables and functions clang used to store two storage classes. The one
"as written" in the code and a patched one, which, for example, propagates
static to the following decls.
This apparently is from the days clang lacked linkage computation. It is now
redundant and this patch removes it.
llvm-svn: 178663
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 177705
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
is non-anonymous or is defined in a typedef of itself.
llvm-svn: 176742
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
anonymous tag declarations encountered during template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 176727
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No (intended) functionality change.
llvm-svn: 176726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
consumer
just using ASTConsumer::HandleCXXStaticMemberVarInstantiation(), don't pass it with
ASTConsumer::HandleTopLevelDecl.
ASTConsumer::HandleTopLevelDecl is intended for user-written top-level decls;
a consumer can treat an instantiated static data member however it wants of course.
llvm-svn: 175976
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 175875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the normal attribute-merging path, because we can't merge alignment attributes
without knowing the complete set of alignment attributes which apply to a
particular declaration.
llvm-svn: 175861
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 175705
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post-commit CR feedback from Jordan Rose regarding r175594.
llvm-svn: 175679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The TypeLoc hierarchy used the llvm::cast machinery to perform undefined
behavior by casting pointers/references to TypeLoc objects to derived types
and then using the derived copy constructors (or even returning pointers to
derived types that actually point to the original TypeLoc object).
Some context is in this thread:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-December/056804.html
Though it's spread over a few months which can be hard to read in the mail
archive.
llvm-svn: 175462
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also support alignas(0), which C++11 and C11 require us to ignore.
llvm-svn: 174157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove "IsMSDeclspec" argument from Align attribute since the arguments in Attr.td should
only model those appear in source code. Introduce attribute Accessor, and teach TableGen
to generate syntax kind accessors for Align attribute, and use those accessors to decide
if an alignment attribute is a declspec attribute.
llvm-svn: 174133
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instantiation.
llvm-svn: 173768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for template instantiations, and use it to simplify the implementation of
FunctionDecl::isInlined().
This incidentally changes the result of isInlined on a declared-but-not-defined
non-inline member function from true to false. This is sort of a bug fix, but
currently isInlined is only called on function definitions, so it has no visible
effects.
llvm-svn: 173397
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 172701
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 171367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
copy-list-initialization (and doesn't add an additional copy step):
Fill in the ListInitialization bit when creating a CXXConstructExpr. Use it
when instantiating initializers in order to correctly handle instantiation of
copy-list-initialization. Teach TreeTransform that function arguments are
initializations, and so need this special treatment too. Finally, remove some
hacks which were working around SubstInitializer's shortcomings.
llvm-svn: 170489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
per review discussion in r170365
This does limit these typedefs to being sequences, but no current usage
requires them to be contiguous (we could expand this to a more general
iterator pair range concept at some point).
Also, it'd be nice if SmallVector were constructible directly from an ArrayRef
but this is a bit tricky since ArrayRef depends on SmallVectorBaseImpl for the
inverse conversion. (& generalizing over all range-like things, while nice,
would require some nontrivial SFINAE I haven't thought about yet)
llvm-svn: 170482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
definition, rather than at the end of the definition of the set of nested
classes. We still defer checking of the user-specified exception specification
to the end of the nesting -- we can't check that until we've parsed the
in-class initializers for non-static data members.
llvm-svn: 169805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove pre-standard restriction on explicitly-defaulted copy constructors with
'incorrect' parameter types, and instead just make those special members
non-trivial as the standard requires.
This required making CXXRecordDecl correctly handle classes which have both a
trivial and a non-trivial special member of the same kind.
This also fixes PR13217 by reimplementing DiagnoseNontrivial in terms of the
new triviality computation technology.
llvm-svn: 169667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 168145
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 167929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
libraries have an incorrect definition of std::common_type (inherited from a
bug in the standard -- see LWG issue 2141), whereby they produce reference
types when they should not.
If we instantiate a typedef named std::common_type<...>::type, which is defined
in a system header as decltype(... ? ... : ...), and the decltype produces a
reference type, convert it to the non-reference type. (This doesn't affect any
LWG2141-conforming implementation of common_type, such as libc++'s, because the
default implementation of common_type<...>::type isn't supposed to produce a
reference type.)
This is horrible. I'm really sorry. :( Better ideas appreciated!
llvm-svn: 166455
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 165258
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instantiations if we encountered errors parsing some of the initializers.
llvm-svn: 164578
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
non-function friend declaration. Patch by Josh Magee!
llvm-svn: 164273
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
type of an instantiation.
llvm-svn: 163848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TypeSourceInfo, we may have lost some adjustments made to the type of
that function due to declaration merging. Adjust the resulting type
correspondingly. Fixes PR12948 / <rdar://problem/11552434>.
llvm-svn: 163845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
parameter packs where the reference is not being expanded but the pack has
been. Previously, Clang would segfault in such cases.
llvm-svn: 163672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
unexpanded parameter pack is a pack expansion. Thus, as with a non-type template
parameter which is a pack expansion, it needs to be expanded early into a fixed
list of template parameters.
Since the expanded list of template parameters is not itself a parameter pack,
it is permitted to appear before the end of the template parameter list, so also
remove that restriction (for both template template parameter pack expansions and
non-type template parameter pack expansions).
llvm-svn: 163369
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 163208
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SmallVector.
llvm-svn: 162492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These were nops for quite a while and only lead to confusion. ASTMultiPtr
now behaves like a proper dumb array reference.
llvm-svn: 162475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
things going on here that were problematic:
- We were missing the actual access check, or rather, it was suppressed
on account of being a redeclaration lookup.
- The access check would naturally happen during delay, which isn't
appropriate in this case.
- We weren't actually emitting dependent diagnostics associated with
class templates, which was unfortunate.
- Access was being propagated incorrectly for friend method declarations
that couldn't be matched at parse-time.
llvm-svn: 161652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a defaulted special member function until the exception specification is needed
(using the same criteria used for the delayed instantiation of exception
specifications for function temploids).
EST_Delayed is now EST_Unevaluated (using 1330's terminology), and, like
EST_Uninstantiated, carries a pointer to the FunctionDecl which will be used to
resolve the exception specification.
This is enabled for all C++ modes: it's a little faster in the case where the
exception specification isn't used, allows our C++11-in-C++98 extensions to
work, and is still correct for C++98, since in that mode the computation of the
exception specification can't fail.
The diagnostics here aren't great (in particular, we should include implicit
evaluation of exception specifications for defaulted special members in the
template instantiation backtraces), but they're not much worse than before.
Our approach to the problem of cycles between in-class initializers and the
exception specification for a defaulted default constructor is modified a
little by this change -- we now reject any odr-use of a defaulted default
constructor if that constructor uses an in-class initializer and the use is in
an in-class initialzer which is declared lexically earlier. This is a closer
approximation to the current draft solution in core issue 1351, but isn't an
exact match (but the current draft wording isn't reasonable, so that's to be
expected).
llvm-svn: 160847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
change once it's been assigned. It can change in two ways:
1) In a template instantiation, the context declaration should be the
instantiated declaration, not the declaration in the template.
2) If a lambda appears in the pattern of a variadic pack expansion, the
mangling number will depend on the pack length.
llvm-svn: 160614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and a function template instantiation, if there's a parameter pack in the
declaration and one at the same place in the instantiation, don't assume that
the pack wasn't expanded -- it may have expanded to nothing. Instead, go ahead
and check whether the parameter pack was expandable. We can do this as a
side-effect of the work we'd need to do anyway, to find how many parameters
were produced.
llvm-svn: 160416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
template.
Review by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 160306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
static_assert fails when parsing the template, don't diagnose it again on every
instantiation.
llvm-svn: 160088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-ftemplate-depth limit. There are various ways to get an infinite (or merely
huge) stack of substitutions with no intervening instantiations. This is also
consistent with gcc's behavior.
llvm-svn: 159907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for non-type template parameters in microsoft mode.
PR12709.
llvm-svn: 159147
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
conflicts from a separate problematic patch.
llvm-svn: 158750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The original r158700 caused crashes in the gcc test suite,
g++.abi/vtable3a.C among others. It also caused failures in the libc++
test suite.
llvm-svn: 158749
|