summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
...
* Silence a bunch of implicit fallthrough warningsAdrian Prantl2017-12-191-2/+2
| | | | llvm-svn: 321115
* Refactor overridden methods iteration to avoid double lookups.Benjamin Kramer2017-12-171-18/+10
| | | | | | Convert most uses to range-for loops. No functionality change intended. llvm-svn: 320954
* Don't trigger -Wuser-defined-literals for system headersDimitry Andric2017-12-141-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: In D41064, I proposed adding `#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wuser-defined-literals"` to some of libc++'s headers, since these warnings are now triggered by clang's new `-std=gnu++14` default: ``` $ cat test.cpp #include <string> $ clang -std=c++14 -Wsystem-headers -Wall -Wextra -c test.cpp In file included from test.cpp:1: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/string:470: /usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:763:29: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals] basic_string_view<char> operator "" sv(const char *__str, size_t __len) ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:769:32: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals] basic_string_view<wchar_t> operator "" sv(const wchar_t *__str, size_t __len) ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:775:33: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals] basic_string_view<char16_t> operator "" sv(const char16_t *__str, size_t __len) ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:781:33: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals] basic_string_view<char32_t> operator "" sv(const char32_t *__str, size_t __len) ^ In file included from test.cpp:1: /usr/include/c++/v1/string:4012:24: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals] basic_string<char> operator "" s( const char *__str, size_t __len ) ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/string:4018:27: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals] basic_string<wchar_t> operator "" s( const wchar_t *__str, size_t __len ) ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/string:4024:28: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals] basic_string<char16_t> operator "" s( const char16_t *__str, size_t __len ) ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/string:4030:28: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals] basic_string<char32_t> operator "" s( const char32_t *__str, size_t __len ) ^ 8 warnings generated. ``` Both @aaron.ballman and @mclow.lists felt that adding this workaround to the libc++ headers was the wrong way, and it should be fixed in clang instead. Here is a proposal to do just that. I verified that this suppresses the warning, even when -Wsystem-headers is used, and that the warning is still emitted for a declaration outside of system headers. Reviewers: aaron.ballman, mclow.lists, rsmith Reviewed By: aaron.ballman Subscribers: mclow.lists, aaron.ballman, andrew, emaste, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41080 llvm-svn: 320755
* Allow conditions to be decomposed with structured bindingsZhihao Yuan2017-12-071-5/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This feature was discussed but not yet proposed. It allows a structured binding to appear as a //condition// if (auto [ok, val] = f(...)) So the user can save an extra //condition// if the statement can test the value to-be-decomposed instead. Formally, it makes the value of the underlying object of the structured binding declaration also the value of a //condition// that is an initialized declaration. Considering its logicality which is entirely evident from its trivial implementation, I think it might be acceptable to land it as an extension for now before I write the paper. Reviewers: rsmith, faisalv, aaron.ballman Reviewed By: rsmith Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39284 llvm-svn: 320011
* Remove old concepts parsing codeHubert Tong2017-12-071-4/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This is so we can implement concepts per P0734R0. Relevant failing test cases are disabled. Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, rsmith, saar.raz, nwilson Reviewed By: saar.raz Subscribers: cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40380 Patch by Changyu Li! llvm-svn: 319992
* Now that C++17 is official (https://www.iso.org/standard/68564.html), start ↵Aaron Ballman2017-12-041-2/+2
| | | | | | changing the C++1z terminology over to C++17. NFC intended, these are all mechanical changes. llvm-svn: 319688
* Change assertion to quick exit from checking function.Richard Trieu2017-11-011-3/+2
| | | | | | | Remove the assertion that could be triggered by invalid code. Replace it with an early exit from the checking function. llvm-svn: 317073
* [MS] Allow access to ambiguous, inaccessible direct basesReid Kleckner2017-10-271-17/+38
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Clang typically warns that in the following class hierarchy, 'A' is inaccessible because there is no series of casts that the user can write to access it unambiguously: struct A { }; struct B : A { }; struct C : A, B { }; MSVC allows the user to convert from C* to A*, though, and we've encountered this issue in the latest Windows SDK headers. This patch allows this conversion when -fms-compatibility is set and adds a warning for it under -Wmicrosoft-inaccessible-base. Reviewers: rsmith Subscribers: cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39389 llvm-svn: 316807
* Support for destroying operator delete, per C++2a proposal P0722.Richard Smith2017-10-131-7/+53
| | | | | | | | | | This feature is not (yet) approved by the C++ committee, so this is liable to be reverted or significantly modified based on committee feedback. No functionality change intended for existing code (a new type must be defined in namespace std to take advantage of this feature). llvm-svn: 315662
* [Sema][Crash] Correctly handle an non-dependent noexcept expr in function ↵Erich Keane2017-10-121-4/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | template It seems that all of the other templated cases are handled correctly, however the function template case was not correctly handled. This patch recovers from this condition by setting the function to noexcept after diagnosing. Previously it simply set NoexceptExpr to null, which caused an Assert when this was evaluated during substitution. Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D38700 llvm-svn: 315638
* [Modules TS] Module ownership semantics for redeclarations.Richard Smith2017-10-101-11/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module ("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule. This reinstates r315251 and r315256, reverted in r315309 and r315308 respectively, tweaked to avoid triggering a linkage calculation when declaring implicit special members (this exposed our pre-existing issue with typedef names for linkage changing the linkage of types whose linkage has already been computed and cached in more cases). A testcase for that regression has been added in r315366. llvm-svn: 315379
* Revert "[Modules TS] Module ownership semantics for redeclarations."Eric Liu2017-10-101-20/+11
| | | | | | This reverts commit r315251. See the original commit thread for reason. llvm-svn: 315309
* [Modules TS] Module ownership semantics for redeclarations.Richard Smith2017-10-091-11/+20
| | | | | | | | | | When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module ("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule. llvm-svn: 315251
* PR33839: Fix -Wunused handling for structured binding declarations.Richard Smith2017-10-021-1/+4
| | | | | | | We warn about a structured binding declaration being unused only if none of its bindings are used. llvm-svn: 314733
* [Sema] Correct nothrow inherited by noexceptErich Keane2017-09-281-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | As reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33235, a noexcept function was unable to inherit from a nothrow defaulted constructor. Attribute "nothrow" is supposed to be semantically identical to noexcept, and in fact, a number of other places in the code treat them identically. This patch simply checks the RecordDecl for the correct attribute in the case where no other exception specifier was set. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38209 llvm-svn: 314462
* Consolidate std::move() detection code. No behavior change.Nico Weber2017-09-281-8/+3
| | | | llvm-svn: 314427
* Give external linkage and mangling to lambdas inside inline variables and ↵Richard Smith2017-09-221-13/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | variable templates. This implements the proposed approach in https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/33 This reinstates r313827, reverted in r313856, with a fix for the 'out-of-bounds enumeration value' ubsan error in that change. llvm-svn: 313955
* Add support for attribute 'noescape'.Akira Hatanaka2017-09-221-2/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute 'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves IRGen for ObjC blocks. This recommits r313722, which was reverted in r313725 because clang couldn't build compiler-rt. It failed to build because there were function declarations that were missing 'noescape'. That has been fixed in r313929. rdar://problem/19886775 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32210 llvm-svn: 313945
* Revert "Give external linkage and mangling to lambdas inside inline ↵Vitaly Buka2017-09-211-13/+13
| | | | | | | | | | variables and variable templates." To fix: runtime error: load of value 15, which is not a valid value for type 'clang::LVComputationKind' This reverts commit r313827. llvm-svn: 313856
* [MS Compat]Allow __interfaces to have properties.Erich Keane2017-09-201-247/+250
| | | | | | | | | | __interface types are allowed in MSVC to have "property" data members (marked with declspec property). This patch alters Sema to allow property data members. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38092 llvm-svn: 313828
* Give external linkage and mangling to lambdas inside inline variables and ↵Richard Smith2017-09-201-13/+13
| | | | | | | | variable templates. This implements the proposed approach in https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/33 llvm-svn: 313827
* Revert "Add support for attribute 'noescape'."Akira Hatanaka2017-09-201-15/+2
| | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit r313722. It looks like compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_libdispatch_mac.cc cannot be compiled because some of the functions declared in the file do not match the ones in the SDK headers (which are annotated with 'noescape'). llvm-svn: 313725
* Add support for attribute 'noescape'.Akira Hatanaka2017-09-201-2/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute 'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves IRGen for ObjC blocks. rdar://problem/19886775 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32210 llvm-svn: 313722
* Revert "Add support for attribute 'noescape'."Akira Hatanaka2017-09-201-15/+2
| | | | | | | | This reverts r313717. I closed the wrong phabricator review. llvm-svn: 313721
* Add support for attribute 'noescape'.Akira Hatanaka2017-09-201-2/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute 'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves IRGen for ObjC blocks. rdar://problem/19886775 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32520 llvm-svn: 313720
* [Sema] Fix a pair of crashes when generating exception specifiers with anErich Keane2017-09-181-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | error'ed field for a template class' default ctor. The two examples in the test would both cause a compiler assert when attempting to calculate the exception specifier for the default constructor for the template classes. The problem was that dependents of this function expect that Field->getInClassInitializer (including canThrow) is not nullptr. However, if the template's initializer has an error, exactly that situation happens. This patch simply sets the field to be invalid. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37865 llvm-svn: 313569
* Fix the __interface inheritence rules to work better with IUnknown and IDispatchErich Keane2017-09-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | __interface objects in MSVC are permitted to inherit from __interface types, and interface-like types. Additionally, there are two default interface-like types (IUnknown and IDispatch) that all interface-like types must inherit from. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37308 llvm-svn: 313364
* Diagnostic specific failed condition in a static_assert.Douglas Gregor2017-09-141-2/+14
| | | | | | | | When a static_assert fails, dig out a specific condition to diagnose, using the same logic that we use to find the enable_if condition to diagnose. llvm-svn: 313315
* PR19668, PR23034: Fix handling of move constructors and deleted copyRichard Smith2017-08-161-3/+53
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly. This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC: * Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI list a long time ago). * Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior. We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for a trivial such constructor. This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC: * If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class indirectly, matching MSVC. Based on a patch by Vassil Vassilev, which was based on a patch by Bernd Schmidt, which was based on a patch by Reid Kleckner! This is a re-commit of r310401, which was reverted in r310464 due to ARM failures (which should now be fixed). llvm-svn: 310983
* Revert "PR19668, PR23034: Fix handling of move constructors and deleted copy ↵Diana Picus2017-08-091-53/+3
| | | | | | | | | constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly." This reverts commit r310401 because it seems to have broken some ARM bot(s). llvm-svn: 310464
* PR19668, PR23034: Fix handling of move constructors and deleted copyRichard Smith2017-08-081-3/+53
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly. This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC: * Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI list a long time ago). * Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior. We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for a trivial such constructor. This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC: * If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class indirectly, matching MSVC. llvm-svn: 310401
* Recommit r306103: PR26195: Set correct NestedNameSpecifierLoc for theAlex Lorenz2017-06-271-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | dependent initializer This commit fixes incorrect source positions of dependent c'tor initializers like in the following code: template<typename MyBase> struct Derived: MyBase::InnerIterator { Derived() : MyBase::InnerIterator() {} /// This line is problematic: all positions point to InnerIterator and nothing points to MyBase }; Patch by Serge Preis! Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32439 llvm-svn: 306392
* [Sema] Fix a crash-on-invalid when a template parameter list has a classAkira Hatanaka2017-06-261-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | definition or non-reference class type. The crash occurs when there is a template parameter list in a class that is missing the closing angle bracket followed by a definition of a struct. For example: class C0 { public: template<typename T, typename T1 = T // missing closing angle bracket struct S0 {}; C0() : m(new S0<int>) {} S0<int> *m; }; This happens because the parsed struct is added to the scope of the enclosing class without having its access specifier set, which results in an assertion failure in SemaAccess.cpp later. This commit fixes the crash by adding the parsed struct to the enclosing file scope and marking structs as invalid if they are defined in template parameter lists. rdar://problem/31783961 rdar://problem/19570630 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33606 llvm-svn: 306317
* Revert r306103: "PR26195: Set correct NestedNameSpecifierLoc for theAlex Lorenz2017-06-231-9/+0
| | | | | | | | | dependent initializer" It caused buildbot failures such as this one: http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/test-clang-msc-x64-on-i686-linux-RA/builds/3777/steps/test_clang/logs/Clang%20%3A%3A%20Index__ctor-init-source-loc.cpp llvm-svn: 306111
* PR26195: Set correct NestedNameSpecifierLoc for the dependent initializerAlex Lorenz2017-06-231-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit fixes incorrect source positions of dependent c'tor initializers like in the following code: template<typename MyBase> struct Derived: MyBase::InnerIterator { Derived() : MyBase::InnerIterator() {} /// This line is problematic: all positions point to InnerIterator and nothing points to MyBase }; Patch by Serge Preis! Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32439 llvm-svn: 306103
* Function with unparsed body is a definitionSerge Pavlov2017-06-211-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785: ``` template<typename T> struct Somewhat { void internal() const {} friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {} }; void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); } ``` When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet. To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set. This change fixes PR14785. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375 This is a recommit of 305379, reverted in 305381, with small changes. llvm-svn: 305903
* Reverted 305379 (Function with unparsed body is a definition)Serge Pavlov2017-06-141-3/+0
| | | | | | It broke clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules-2 and some other buildbots. llvm-svn: 305381
* Function with unparsed body is a definitionSerge Pavlov2017-06-141-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785: ``` template<typename T> struct Somewhat { void internal() const {} friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {} }; void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); } ``` When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet. To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set. This change fixes PR14785. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375 llvm-svn: 305379
* Do not inherit default arguments for friend function in class template.Serge Pavlov2017-06-081-11/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A function declared in a friend declaration may have declarations prior to the containing class definition. If such declaration defines default argument, the friend function declaration inherits them. This behavior causes problems if the class where the friend is declared is a template: during the class instantiation the friend function looks like if it had default arguments, so error is triggered. With this change friend functions declared in class templates do not inherit default arguments. Actual set of them will be defined at the point where the containing class is instantiated. This change fixes PR12724. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30393 llvm-svn: 304965
* Improve diagnostics if friend function redefines file-level function.Serge Pavlov2017-06-081-1/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Clang makes check for function redefinition after it merged the new declaration with the existing one. As a result, it produces poor diagnostics in the case of a friend function defined inline, as in the code: ``` void func() {} class C { friend void func() {} }; ``` Error message in this case states that `inline declaration of 'func' follows non-inline definition`, which is misleading, as `func` does not have explicit `inline` specifier. With this changes compiler reports function redefinition if the new function is a friend defined inline and it does not have explicit `inline` specifier. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26065 llvm-svn: 304964
* PR33318: Add missing full-expression checking to static_assert expression.Richard Smith2017-06-061-0/+8
| | | | | | | This fixes missing lambda-captures for variables referenced only inside a static_assert (!), among other things. llvm-svn: 304760
* Added LLVM_FALLTHROUGH to address warning: this statement may fall through. NFC.Galina Kistanova2017-06-031-0/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 304651
* Switch from using a DiagnosticTrap and a note for "while defining a specialRichard Smith2017-05-251-142/+113
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | member function" context notes to registering an entry on the context stack. Also reorder the steps within defining special members to be consistent. This has a few benefits: if multiple diagnostics are produced while checking such a member, the note is now attached to the first such diagnostic rather than the last, this prepares us for persisting these diagnostics between the point at which we require the implicit instantiation of a template and the point at which that instantiation is actually performed, and this fixes some cases where we would fail to produce a full note stack leading back to user code in the case of such a diagnostic. The reordering exposed a case where we could recursively attempt to define a defaulted destructor while we're already defining one (and other such cases also appear to be possible, with or without this change), so this change also reuses the "willHaveBody" flag on function declarations to track that we're in the middle of synthesizing a body for the function and bails out if we try to define a function that we're already defining. llvm-svn: 303930
* Add #pragma clang attributeAlex Lorenz2017-04-181-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures. The original commit message is displayed below: The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to be supported by the pragma: - It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file. - It must be documented. - It must not be late parsed. - It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009 llvm-svn: 300556
* Revert r300539 - Add #pragma clang attributeAlex Lorenz2017-04-181-2/+0
| | | | | | | Some tests fail on the Windows buildbots. I will have to investigate more. This commit reverts r300539, r300540 and r300542. llvm-svn: 300543
* Add #pragma clang attributeAlex Lorenz2017-04-181-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to be supported by the pragma: - It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file. - It must be documented. - It must not be late parsed. - It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009 llvm-svn: 300539
* [NFC, Scoped Enum] Convert Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContext into a scoped EnumFaisal Vali2017-04-011-3/+6
| | | | | | | | - also replace direct equality checks against the ConstantEvaluated enumerator with isConstantEvaluted(), in anticipation of adding finer granularity to the various ConstantEvaluated contexts and reinstating certain restrictions on where lambda expressions can occur in C++17. - update the clang tablegen backend that uses these Enumerators, and add the relevant scope where needed. llvm-svn: 299316
* Spelling mistakes in comments. NFCI. (PR27635)Simon Pilgrim2017-03-301-2/+2
| | | | llvm-svn: 299083
* [Objective-C] Miscellaneous -fobjc-weak FixesBrian Kelley2017-03-291-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: After examining the remaining uses of LangOptions.ObjCAutoRefCount, found a some additional places to also check for ObjCWeak not covered by previous test cases. Added a test file to verify all the code paths that were changed. Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rjmccall Reviewed By: rjmccall Subscribers: cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31007 llvm-svn: 299015
* [Objective-C] C++ Classes with __weak Members non-POD Types when using ↵Brian Kelley2017-03-291-5/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -fobjc-weak Summary: When adding an Objective-C retainable type member to a C++ class, also check the LangOpts.ObjCWeak flag and the lifetime qualifier so __weak qualified Objective-C pointer members cause the class to be a non-POD type with non-trivial special members, so the compiler always emits the necessary runtime calls for copying, moving, and destroying the weak member. Otherwise, Objective-C++ classes with weak Objective-C pointer members compiled with -fobjc-weak exhibit undefined behavior if the C++ class is classified as a POD type. Reviewers: rsmith, benlangmuir, doug.gregor, rjmccall Reviewed By: rjmccall Subscribers: cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31003 llvm-svn: 299008
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud