| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
sure to update the exception specification on the declaration as well as the
definition. If we're building in -fno-exceptions mode, nothing else will
trigger it to be updated.
llvm-svn: 161008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a defaulted special member function until the exception specification is needed
(using the same criteria used for the delayed instantiation of exception
specifications for function temploids).
EST_Delayed is now EST_Unevaluated (using 1330's terminology), and, like
EST_Uninstantiated, carries a pointer to the FunctionDecl which will be used to
resolve the exception specification.
This is enabled for all C++ modes: it's a little faster in the case where the
exception specification isn't used, allows our C++11-in-C++98 extensions to
work, and is still correct for C++98, since in that mode the computation of the
exception specification can't fail.
The diagnostics here aren't great (in particular, we should include implicit
evaluation of exception specifications for defaulted special members in the
template instantiation backtraces), but they're not much worse than before.
Our approach to the problem of cycles between in-class initializers and the
exception specification for a defaulted default constructor is modified a
little by this change -- we now reject any odr-use of a defaulted default
constructor if that constructor uses an in-class initializer and the use is in
an in-class initialzer which is declared lexically earlier. This is a closer
approximation to the current draft solution in core issue 1351, but isn't an
exact match (but the current draft wording isn't reasonable, so that's to be
expected).
llvm-svn: 160847
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 160622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
structor class under ARC, that struct/class does not have a trivial
move constructor or move assignment operator. Fixes the rest of
<rdar://problem/11738725>.
llvm-svn: 160615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
be defined as deleted, take cv-qualifiers on class members into account when
looking up the copy or move constructor or assignment operator which will be
used for them.
llvm-svn: 160418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constructor will be used for moving that object, in the computation of its
exception specification.
llvm-svn: 160417
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
behavior and is the first step in fixing pr13338.
llvm-svn: 160104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
static_assert fails when parsing the template, don't diagnose it again on every
instantiation.
llvm-svn: 160088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
diagnostics implemented -- see testcases.
I created a new TableGen file for comment diagnostics,
DiagnosticCommentKinds.td, because comment diagnostics don't logically
fit into AST diagnostics file. But I don't feel strongly about it.
This also implements support for self-closing HTML tags in comment
lexer and parser (for example, <br />).
In order to issue precise diagnostics CommentSema needs to know the
declaration the comment is attached to. There is no easy way to find a decl by
comment, so we match comments and decls in lockstep: after parsing one
declgroup we check if we have any new, not yet attached comments. If we do --
then we do the usual comment-finding process.
It is interesting that this automatically handles trailing comments.
We pick up not only comments that precede the declaration, but also
comments that *follow* the declaration -- thanks to the lookahead in
the lexer: after parsing the declgroup we've consumed the semicolon
and looked ahead through comments.
Added -Wdocumentation-html flag for semantic HTML errors to allow the user to
disable only HTML warnings (but not HTML parse errors, which we emit as
warnings in -Wdocumentation).
llvm-svn: 160078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
which will appear in the vtable as used, not just those ones which were
declared within the class itself. Fixes an issue reported as comment#3 in
PR12763 -- we sometimes assert in codegen if we try to emit a reference to a
function declaration which we've not marked as referenced. This also matches
gcc's observed behavior.
llvm-svn: 159895
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move the ASTContext-dependent version out of line.
llvm-svn: 159717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
template instantiation. I wasn't able to reproduce this down to
anything small enough to put in our test suite, but it's "obviously"
okay to set the invalid bit earlier and precludes a
known-broken-but-not-marked-broken class from being used elsewhere.
llvm-svn: 159584
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed by Doug Gregor.
llvm-svn: 159442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This works around a quirk in the way that explicit template specializations are
handled in Clang. We generate an implicit declaration from the original
template which the explicit specialization is considered to redeclare. This
trips up the explicit delete logic.
This change only works around that strange representation. At some point it'd
be nice to remove those extra declarations to make the AST more accurately
reflect the C++ semantics.
Review by Doug Gregor.
llvm-svn: 159167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
resulted in it being reverted. A test for that bug was added in r158950.
Original comment:
If an object (such as a std::string) with an appropriate c_str() member function
is passed to a variadic function in a position where a format string indicates
that c_str()'s return type is desired, provide a note suggesting that the user
may have intended to call the c_str() member.
Factor the non-POD-vararg checking out of DefaultVariadicArgumentPromotion and
move it to SemaChecking in order to facilitate this. Factor the call checking
out of function call checking and block call checking, and extend it to cover
constructor calls too.
Patch by Sam Panzer!
llvm-svn: 159159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Revert "If an object (such as a std::string) with an appropriate c_str() member function"
This reverts commit 7d96f6106bfbd85b1af06f34fdbf2834aad0e47e.
llvm-svn: 158949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
is passed to a variadic function in a position where a format string indicates
that c_str()'s return type is desired, provide a note suggesting that the user
may have intended to call the c_str() member.
Factor the non-POD-vararg checking out of DefaultVariadicArgumentPromotion and
move it to SemaChecking in order to facilitate this. Factor the call checking
out of function call checking and block call checking, and extend it to cover
constructor calls too.
Patch by Sam Panzer!
llvm-svn: 158887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
target Objective-C runtime down to the frontend: break this
down into a single target runtime kind and version, and compute
all the relevant information from that. This makes it
relatively painless to add support for new runtimes to the
compiler. Make the new -cc1 flag, -fobjc-runtime=blah-x.y.z,
available at the driver level as a better and more general
alternative to -fgnu-runtime and -fnext-runtime. This new
concept of an Objective-C runtime also encompasses what we
were previously separating out as the "Objective-C ABI", so
fragile vs. non-fragile runtimes are now really modelled as
different kinds of runtime, paving the way for better overall
differentiation.
As a sort of special case, continue to accept the -cc1 flag
-fobjc-runtime-has-weak, as a sop to PLCompatibilityWeak.
I won't go so far as to say "no functionality change", even
ignoring the new driver flag, but subtle changes in driver
semantics are almost certainly not intended.
llvm-svn: 158793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Escaped "::" and "<" as needed in Doxygen comments;
* Marked up code examples with \code...\endcode;
* Documented a \param that is current, instead of a few that aren't;
* Fixed up some \file and \brief comments.
llvm-svn: 158562
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 158478
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 158477
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-Wunused-private-field.
llvm-svn: 158411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We need an efficient mechanism to determine whether a defaulted default
constructor is constexpr, in order to determine whether a class is a literal
type, so keep the incrementally-built form on CXXRecordDecl. Remove the
on-demand computation of same, so that we only have one method for determining
whether a default constructor is constexpr. This doesn't affect correctness,
since default constructor lookup is much simpler than selecting a constructor
for copying or moving.
We don't need a corresponding mechanism for defaulted copy or move constructors,
since they can't affect whether a type is a literal type. Conversely, checking
whether such functions are constexpr can require non-trivial effort, so we defer
such checks until the copy or move constructor is required.
Thus we now only compute whether a copy or move constructor is constexpr on
demand, and only compute whether a default constructor is constexpr in advance.
This is unfortunate, but seems like the best solution.
llvm-svn: 158290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
an explicitly-defaulted default constructor would be constexpr. This is
necessary in weird (but well-formed) cases where a class has more than one copy
or move constructor.
Cleanup of now-unused parts of CXXRecordDecl to follow.
llvm-svn: 158289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
initialization, and use that information to produce the right kind of
initialization during template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 158288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
value_type
In addition, I've made the pointer and reference typedef 'void' rather than T*
just so they can't get misused. I would've omitted them entirely but
std::distance likes them to be there even if it doesn't use them.
This rolls back r155808 and r155869.
Review by Doug Gregor incorporating feedback from Chandler Carruth.
llvm-svn: 158104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
unused private fields of classes that are fully defined in the current
translation unit.
llvm-svn: 158054
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
dependent contexts. PR12890.
llvm-svn: 157136
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 157117
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
getFETokenInfoAsVoid into its only caller.
llvm-svn: 157116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
into one. These were all performing almost identical checks, with different bugs
in each of them.
This fixes PR12806 (we weren't setting the exception specification for an
explicitly-defaulted, non-user-provided default constructor) and enforces
8.4.2/2's rule that an in-class defaulted member must exactly match the implicit
parameter type.
llvm-svn: 156802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sema::ConvertToIntegralOrEnumerationType() from PartialDiagnostics to
abstract "diagnoser" classes. Not much of a win here, but we're
-several PartialDiagnostics.
llvm-svn: 156217
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 156180
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 156178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
off PartialDiagnostic. PartialDiagnostic is rather heavyweight for
something that is in the critical path and is rarely used. So, switch
over to an abstract-class-based callback mechanism that delays most of
the work until a diagnostic is actually produced. Good for ~11k code
size reduction in the compiler and 1% speedup in -fsyntax-only on the
code in <rdar://problem/11004361>.
llvm-svn: 156176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
refactorings in that revision, and some of the subsequent bugfixes, which
seem to be relevant even without delayed exception specification parsing.
llvm-svn: 156031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
filter_decl_iterator had a weird mismatch where both op* and op-> returned T*
making it difficult to generalize this filtering behavior into a reusable
library of any kind.
This change errs on the side of value, making op-> return T* and op* return
T&.
(reviewed by Richard Smith)
llvm-svn: 155808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
diagnostic, add a test for this paragraph, and tighten up the diagnostic wording
a little.
llvm-svn: 155784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We do not support IRGen for these, and get some parts of the semantic analysis
wrong.
llvm-svn: 155728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't try to query whether an incomplete type has a trivial copy constructor
when determining whether a move constructor should be declared.
llvm-svn: 155575
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
exception specification to a function.
llvm-svn: 155424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
exception specifications in C++11 until after we've parsed the exception
specifications for nested classes.
llvm-svn: 155293
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 155279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
non-const reference parameter type if the class had any subobjects with deleted
copy constructors. This causes a rejects-valid if the class's copy constructor
is explicitly defaulted (as happens for some implementations of std::pair etc).
llvm-svn: 155218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have a new flavor of exception specification, EST_Uninstantiated. A function
type with this exception specification carries a pointer to a FunctionDecl, and
the exception specification for that FunctionDecl is instantiated (if needed)
and used in the place of the function type's exception specification.
When a function template declaration with a non-trivial exception specification
is instantiated, the specialization's exception specification is set to this
new 'uninstantiated' kind rather than being instantiated immediately.
Expr::CanThrow has migrated onto Sema, so it can instantiate exception specs
on-demand. Also, any odr-use of a function triggers the instantiation of its
exception specification (the exception specification could be needed by IRGen).
In passing, fix two places where a DeclRefExpr was created but the corresponding
function was not actually marked odr-used. We used to get away with this, but
don't any more.
Also fix a bug where instantiating an exception specification which refers to
function parameters resulted in a crash. We still have the same bug in default
arguments, which I'll be looking into next.
This, plus a tiny patch to fix libstdc++'s common_type, is enough for clang to
parse (and, in very limited testing, support) all of libstdc++4.7's standard
headers.
llvm-svn: 154886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
exception specifications on member functions until after the closing
'}' for the containing class. This allows, for example, a member
function to throw an instance of its own class. Fixes PR12564 and a
fairly embarassing oversight in our C++98/03 support.
llvm-svn: 154844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in the declaration of a non-static member function after the
(optional) cv-qualifier-seq, which in practice means in the exception
specification and late-specified return type.
The new scheme here used to manage 'this' outside of a member function
scope is more general than the Scope-based mechanism previously used
for non-static data member initializers and late-parsesd attributes,
because it can also handle the cv-qualifiers on the member
function. Note, however, that a separate pass is required for static
member functions to determine whether 'this' was used, because we
might not know that we have a static function until after declaration
matching.
Finally, this introduces name mangling for 'this' and for the implicit
'this', which is intended to match GCC's mangling. Independent
verification for the new mangling test case would be appreciated.
Fixes PR10036 and PR12450.
llvm-svn: 154799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
base-class subojects.
Incidentally, thinking about virtual bases makes it clear to me that
we're not appropriately computing the access to the virtual base's
member because we're not computing the best possible access to the
virtual base at all; in fact, we're basically assuming it's public.
I'll file a separate PR about that.
llvm-svn: 154346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to define a special member function as deleted so that it properly
establishes an object context for the accesses to the base subobject
members.
llvm-svn: 154343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- The [class.protected] restriction is non-trivial for any instance
member, even if the access lacks an object (for example, if it's
a pointer-to-member constant). In this case, it is equivalent to
requiring the naming class to equal the context class.
- The [class.protected] restriction applies to accesses to constructors
and destructors. A protected constructor or destructor can only be
used to create or destroy a base subobject, as a direct result.
- Several places were dropping or misapplying object information.
The standard could really be much clearer about what the object type is
supposed to be in some of these accesses. Usually it's easy enough to
find a reasonable answer, but still, the standard makes a very confident
statement about accesses to instance members only being possible in
either pointer-to-member literals or member access expressions, which
just completely ignores concepts like constructor and destructor
calls, using declarations, unevaluated field references, etc.
llvm-svn: 154248
|