| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
unlock_function attributes with the acquire_capability and release_capability attributes. The old spellings will continue to work, but the underlying semantic attributes have been replaced.
Downgraded the capability diagnostics from error to warning to match the desired behavior, and updated the existing test cases.
llvm-svn: 204350
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
exception_end() with iterator_range exceptions(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 204046
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range body(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 204040
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range decls(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203947
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range inits(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203819
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range ctors(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203814
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with iterator_range methods(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203812
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with iterator_range vbases(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203808
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range bases(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
that implicitly converts to 'bool' (such as pointers, and the first operand of
?:). Clean up issues found by this. Patch by Stephan Tolksdorf!
llvm-svn: 203735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range attrs(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
This is a reapplication of r203236 with modifications to the definition of attrs() and following the new style guidelines on auto usage.
llvm-svn: 203362
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range fields(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203355
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range decls(). The same is true for the noload versions of these APIs. Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203278
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Smith.
llvm-svn: 203262
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with iterator_range chains(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203261
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range params(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203248
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MSVC bots.
llvm-svn: 203237
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
attrs(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203236
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range redecls(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops, which allows the begin/end forms to be removed entirely.
llvm-svn: 203179
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
or virtual functions, but permit that error to be downgraded to
a warning (with -Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct), and officially
support this kind of dual, ABI-mixing layout.
The basic problem here is that projects which use ms_struct are often
not very circumspect about what types they annotate; for example,
some projects enable the pragma in a prefix header and then only
selectively disable it around system header inclusions. They may
only care about binary compatibility with MSVC for a subset of
those structs, but that doesn't mean they have no binary
compatibility concerns at all for the rest; thus we are essentially
forced into supporting this hybrid ABI. But it's reasonable for
us to at least point out the places where we're not making
any guarantees.
The original diagnostic was for dynamic classes, i.e. those with
virtual functions or virtual bases; I've extended it to include
all classes with bases, because we are not actually making any
attempt to duplicate MSVC's base subobject layout in ms_struct
(and it is indeed quite different from Itanium, even for
non-virtual bases).
rdar://16178895
llvm-svn: 202427
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a continuation of r199686.
llvm-svn: 202307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were previously checking at every destructor declaration, but that was a bit
excessive. Since the deleting destructor is emitted with the vtable, do the
check when the vtable is marked used.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2851
llvm-svn: 202046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
management: asserting a capability is held, acquiring a capability and releasing a capability. Also includes some skeleton documentation for these new attributes.
This functionality should be considered a WIP.
llvm-svn: 201890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
functionality) and I have agreed to start migrating from lock-specific terminology to "capability"-specific terminology. This opens the door for future threading-related analysis passes so that a common nomenclature can be used.
The following attributes have been (silently) deprecated, with their replacements listed:
lockable => capability
exclusive_locks_required => requires_capability
shared_locks_required => requires_shared_capability
locks_excluded => requires_capability
There are no functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 201585
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
spelled in an interesting way.
llvm-svn: 201536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
using-declaration, and they declare the same function (either because
the using-declaration is in the same namespace as the declaration it
imports, or because they're both extern "C"), they do not conflict.
llvm-svn: 200897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
redeclaration, not just when looking them up for a use -- we need the implicit
declaration to appropriately check various properties of them (notably, whether
they're deleted).
llvm-svn: 200729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
operator--, since it might instantiate as 'int' (or, if it's a pack, it
might instantiate as an empty pack).
llvm-svn: 200496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow up to r200082.
Spotted by Dmitri
llvm-svn: 200105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the defaulting because it would delete the member, produce additional notes
explaining why the member is implicitly deleted.
llvm-svn: 199829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lift the getFunctionDecl() utility out of the parser into a general
Decl::getAsFunction() and use it to simplify other parts of the implementation.
Reduce isFunctionOrFunctionTemplate() to a simple type check that works the
same was as the other is* functions and move unwrapping of shadowed decls to
callers so it doesn't get run twice.
Shuffle around canSkipFunctionBody() to reduce virtual dispatch on ASTConsumer.
There's no need to query when we already know the body can't be skipped.
llvm-svn: 199794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the program, in C++. (We allow the latter as an extension, since we've always
permitted it, and GCC does the same, and our supported C++ ABIs don't do
anything special in main.)
llvm-svn: 199782
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 199699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
handling C++11 default initializers. Without this, other parts of Sema (such as
lambda capture) would think the default initializer is part of the surrounding
function scope.
llvm-svn: 199453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
user, and attributes implicitly generated to assist in bookkeeping by the compiler. This is done so by table generating a CreateImplicit method for each attribute.
Additionally, remove the optional nature of the spelling list index when creating attributes. This is supported by table generating a Spelling enumeration when the spellings for an attribute are distinct enough to warrant it.
llvm-svn: 199378
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 199311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's been long-standing confusion over the role of these two options. This
commit makes the necessary changes to differentiate them clearly, following up
from r198936.
MicrosoftExt (aka. fms-extensions):
Enable largely unobjectionable Microsoft language extensions to ease
portability. This mode, also supported by gcc, is used for building software
like FreeBSD and Linux kernel extensions that share code with Windows drivers.
MSVCCompat (aka. -fms-compatibility, formerly MicrosoftMode):
Turn on a special mode supporting 'heinous' extensions for drop-in
compatibility with the Microsoft Visual C++ product. Standards-compilant C and
C++ code isn't guaranteed to work in this mode. Implies MicrosoftExt.
Note that full -fms-compatibility mode is currently enabled by default on the
Windows target, which may need tuning to serve as a reasonable default.
See cfe-commits for the full discourse, thread 'r198497 - Move MS predefined
type_info out of InitializePredefinedMacros'
No change in behaviour.
llvm-svn: 199209
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
resolution based on the values of the function arguments at the call site.
llvm-svn: 198996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
type-specifier in C++. Some checks will assert in this case otherwise (in
particular, the access specifier may be missing if this happens inside a class
definition, due to a violation of an AST invariant).
llvm-svn: 198721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
unneeded typecasts. getScopeRep() already returns a NestedNameSpecifier.
No functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 198414
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NestedNameSpecifier.
llvm-svn: 198413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We would previously emit redundant diagnostics for the following code:
struct S {
virtual ~S() = delete;
void operator delete(void*, int);
void operator delete(void*, double);
} s;
First we would check on ~S() and error about the ambigous delete functions,
and then we would error about using the deleted destructor.
If the destructor is deleted, there's no need to check it.
Also, move the check from Sema::ActOnFields to CheckCompleteCXXClass. These
are run at almost the same time, called from ActOnFinishCXXMemberSpecification.
However, CHeckCompleteCXXClass may mark a defaulted destructor as deleted, and
if that's the case we don't want to check it.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2421
llvm-svn: 197509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Methods are thiscall by default in the MS ABI, and also in MinGW targetting GCC 4.7 or later.
This changes the diagnostic from the technically correct but hard to understand:
virtual function 'foo' has different calling convention attributes ('void ()') than the function it overrides (which has calling convention 'void () __attribute__((thiscall))')
to the more intuitive and also correct:
'static' member function 'foo' overrides a virtual function
We already have a test for this. Let's just run it in both ABI modes.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2375
llvm-svn: 197055
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 196959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
more than one such initializer in a union, make mem-initializers override
default initializers for other union members, handle anonymous unions with
anonymous struct members better. Fix a couple of semi-related bugs exposed by
the tests for same.
llvm-svn: 196892
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 196510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
delete on a class which has no array cookie and has no class-specific operator
new.
llvm-svn: 196488
|