| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 50666
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
think it is really right. :) This fixes PR2284.
llvm-svn: 50665
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
related to pp-expressions. Doing so is pretty simple and this
patch implements it, yielding nice diagnostics like:
t.c:2:7: error: division by zero in preprocessor expression
#if 1 / (0 + 0)
~ ^ ~~~~~~~
t.c:5:14: error: expected ')' in preprocessor expression
#if (412 + 42
~~~~~~~~^
t.c:5:5: error: to match this '('
#if (412 + 42
^
t.c:10:10: warning: left side of operator converted from negative value to unsigned: -42 to 18446744073709551574
#if (-42 + 0U) / -2
~~~ ^ ~~
t.c:10:16: warning: right side of operator converted from negative value to unsigned: -2 to 18446744073709551614
#if (-42 + 0U) / -2
~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~
5 diagnostics generated.
llvm-svn: 50638
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
the final part of PR2279
llvm-svn: 50635
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 50632
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 50631
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a) correct rejection of ',' in pp expressions.
b) the precedence of ',' was wrong w.r.t. ?:.
Thanks again to Neil for finding these and providing testcases.
llvm-svn: 50625
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
for pointing this out.
llvm-svn: 50624
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 50617
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
more nice.
llvm-svn: 49619
|
|
|
lib dir and move all the libraries into it. This follows the main
llvm tree, and allows the libraries to be built in parallel. The
top level now enforces that all the libs are built before Driver,
but we don't care what order the libs are built in. This speeds
up parallel builds, particularly incremental ones.
llvm-svn: 48402
|
