| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
LoooooooooooongType *
loooooooooooongVariable;
After:
LoooooooooooongType
*loooooooooooongVariable;
llvm-svn: 232044
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was already a TODO to double-check whether the extra indenation
makes sense. A slightly different case reveals that it is actively harmful:
for (int i = 0; i < aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ||
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb < ccccccccccccccc;
++i) {
}
Here (and it is probably not a totally infrequent case, it just works out that
"i < " is four spaces and so the four space extra indentation makes the
operator precedence confusing. So, this will now instead be formatted
as:
for (int i = 0; i < aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ||
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb < ccccccccccccccc;
++i) {
}
llvm-svn: 231461
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
Aaaa aaaaaaaaaaa{
{
a, // +1 indent weird.
b, // trailing comma signals one per line.
}, // trailing comma signals one per line.
};
After:
Aaaa aaaaaaaaaaa{
{
a, // better!?
b, // trailing comma signals one per line.
}, // trailing comma signals one per line.
};
Interesting that this apparently was entirely untested :-(.
llvm-svn: 230627
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 229486
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 229485
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added an assertion that triggered in an existing test case (without
observable differences) and fixed the code.
llvm-svn: 227677
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
const char *x =
"hello llvm";
After:
const char *x = "hello llvm";
This fixes llvm.org/PR22245.
Patch by Bill Meltsner, thank you!
llvm-svn: 226564
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 226449
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This assert would trigger on:
#d , = }
llvm-svn: 226446
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
Constructor()
: Constructor([] { // comment
int i;
}) {}
After:
Constructor()
: Constructor([] { // comment
int i;
}) {}
llvm-svn: 225625
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225559
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This was broken by r224120.
llvm-svn: 225130
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6636
llvm-svn: 224223
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The proper way to break string literals in these languages is by inserting a "+"
between parts which we don't support yet. So we disable string literal breaking
until then.
llvm-svn: 224120
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixed llvm.org/PR21804 and hopefully a few other strange cases.
Before:
if (blah_blah(whatever, whatever, [] {
doo_dah();
doo_dah();
})) {
}
}
After:
if (blah_blah(whatever, whatever, [] {
doo_dah();
doo_dah();
})) {
}
}
llvm-svn: 224112
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They are against the LLVM coding conventions. No functional changes
intended.
llvm-svn: 223930
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This only applies when not aligning after the return itself (which is
commonly done for C++.
Before:
return aaaaaaaaaa
? bbbbbbbbbb(
bbbbbb) // This is indented relative to aaaaaaaaaa.
: b;
After:
return aaaaaaaaaa
? bbbbbbbbbb(
bbbbbb)
: b;
llvm-svn: 223694
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
@Mock DataLoader loooooooooooooooooooooooader =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
After:
@Mock
DataLoader loooooooooooooooooooooooader =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
llvm-svn: 223688
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With alignment:
int aaaaaa = aa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
* cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
Without alignment:
int aaaaaa = aa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
* cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
This fixes llvm.org/PR21666.
llvm-svn: 223117
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
bool value = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
== aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
* bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
&& aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
* aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
> ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
After:
bool value = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
== aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
* bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
&& aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
* aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
> ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
Not particularly pretty, but can probably help to uncover bugs. And if this
bugs somebody, parentheses can help.
llvm-svn: 223111
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Re-apply r222638 and r222641 without variadic templates.
llvm-svn: 222747
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
does not support variadic templates. Also reverting r222641 because it was relying on 222638.
llvm-svn: 222656
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Provide more overloads to simplify testing the type of a token. No
functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 222638
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are like import statements and should not be line-wrapped. Minor
restructuring of the handling of other import statements.
llvm-svn: 222637
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously this was only used for JavaScript.
Before:
functionCall({
int i;
int j;
},
aaaa, bbbb, cccc);
After:
functionCall({
int i;
int j;
}, aaaa, bbbb, cccc);
llvm-svn: 222531
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Doesn't seem to be common practice in Java.
Before:
return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
&& bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
&& ccccccccccccccccccc;
After:
return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
&& bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
&& ccccccccccccccccccc;
Patch by Harry Terkelsen.
llvm-svn: 222424
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
SomeFunction(parameter,
parameter);
After:
SomeFunction(parameter,
parameter);
Patch by Harry Terkelsen, thank you!
llvm-svn: 222284
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
void SomeLoooooooooooongFunction(
std::unique_ptr<aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa>
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, int bbbbbbbbbbbbb);
After:
void SomeLoooooooooooongFunction(
std::unique_ptr<aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa>
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
int bbbbbbbbbbbbb);
llvm-svn: 221989
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
int i = (a)
// comment
+ b;
return aaaa == bbbb
// comment
? aaaa
: bbbb;
After:
int i = (a)
// comment
+ b;
return aaaa == bbbb
// comment
? aaaa
: bbbb;
llvm-svn: 221985
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit eefd2eaad43c5c2b17953ae7ed1e72b28e696f7b.
Apparently, this change was a bit premature.
llvm-svn: 221365
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Slightly easier to write, more efficient and prevents bugs by
misspelling them.
No functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 221259
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
@SomeAnnotation()
abstract
class aaaaaaaaaaaa extends bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb implements cccccccccccc {
}
After:
@SomeAnnotation()
abstract class aaaaaaaaaaaa extends bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
implements cccccccccccc {
}
llvm-svn: 221121
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
abstract class SomeClass extends SomeOtherClass implements
SomeInterface {}
After:
abstract class SomeClass extends SomeOtherClass
implements SomeInterface {}
llvm-svn: 221103
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
@SomeAnnotation("With some really looooooooooooooong text") private static final
long something = 0L;
void SomeFunction(@Nullable
String something) {}
After:
@SomeAnnotation("With some really looooooooooooooong text")
private static final long something = 0L;
void SomeFunction(@Nullable String something) {}
llvm-svn: 220984
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The style guide is changing..
llvm-svn: 220977
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently, people are very much divided on what the "correct"
indentation is. So, best to give them a choice.
The new flag is called ObjCBlockIndentWidth and the default is now set
to the same value as IndentWidth for the pre-defined styles.
llvm-svn: 220784
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
void
SomeFunction(int parameter);
After:
void SomeFunction(
int parameter);
(Unless AlwaysBreakAfterDefinitionReturnType after type is set).
llvm-svn: 220686
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
optional Type type = 1 [(mutate_options) = {vital : true
abc : false}];
After:
optional Type type = 1 [(mutate_options) = {
vital : true
abc : false
}];
llvm-svn: 220679
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
@Override public String toString() { .. }
After:
@Override
public String toString() { .. }
llvm-svn: 220274
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is desirable for the Chromium style guide:
http://www.chromium.org/developers/coding-style
llvm-svn: 219400
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
SomeFunction(a, a,
// comment
b + x);
After:
SomeFunction(a, a,
// comment
b + x);
llvm-svn: 219209
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
getSomeLongPromise(.....)
.then(
function(value) {
body();
body();
})
.thenCatch(function(error) {
body();
body();
});
After:
getSomeLongPromise(.....)
.then(function(value) {
body();
body();
})
.thenCatch(function(error) {
body();
body();
});
llvm-svn: 218595
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It has proven to not be a food idea in many case.
llvm-svn: 218107
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
EXPECT_CALL(SomeObject, SomeFunction(Parameter)).Times(2).WillRepeatedly(
Return(SomeValue));
After:
EXPECT_CALL(SomeObject, SomeFunction(Parameter))
.Times(2)
.WillRepeatedly(Return(SomeValue));
llvm-svn: 217687
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
return {
a: a,
link:
function() {
f(); //
},
link:
function() {
f(); //
}
};
After:
return {
a: a,
link: function() {
f(); //
},
link: function() {
f(); //
}
};
llvm-svn: 217238
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
f(FirstToken->WhitespaceRange.getBegin().getLocWithOffset(
First->LastNewlineOffset));
After:
f(FirstToken->WhitespaceRange.getBegin()
.getLocWithOffset(First->LastNewlineOffset));
llvm-svn: 216377
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
new (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa))
typename aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
After:
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
new (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa))
typename aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
llvm-svn: 214964
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Initial patch and tests by Kaushik Sridharan, thank you!
llvm-svn: 214084
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now, this can be properly formatted:
static_cast<A< //
B> *>( //
);
Before, clang-format could end up, not formatting the code at all.
llvm-svn: 213055
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Though not completely identical, make former
IndentFunctionDeclarationAfterType change this flag for backwards
compatibility (it is somewhat close in meaning and better the err'ing on
an unknown config flag).
llvm-svn: 212597
|