| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
phase.
Summary:
Because SamplePGO passes will be invoked twice in ThinLTO build: once at compile phase, the other at backend. We want to make sure the IR at the 2nd phase matches the hot part in pro
file, thus we do not want to inline hot callsites in the first phase.
Reviewers: tejohnson, eraman
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31202
llvm-svn: 298429
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 298394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Setting dllexport on a declaration has no effect, as we do not emit export
directives for declarations.
Part of the fix for PR32334.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31162
llvm-svn: 298330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In doing so, clean up the MD5 interface a little. Most
existing users only care about the lower 8 bytes of an MD5,
but for some users that care about the upper and lower,
there wasn't a good interface. Furthermore, consumers
of the MD5 checksum were required to handle endianness
details on their own, so it seems reasonable to abstract
this into a nicer interface that just gives you the right
value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31105
llvm-svn: 298322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: rnk, mkuper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27051
llvm-svn: 298177
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
unused anywhere in llvm.
llvm-svn: 298022
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
an implementation detail
llvm-svn: 297975
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 297784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a follow-up to r297700 (Add a nullability sanitizer).
It addresses some FIXME's re: using nullability-specific diagnostic
handlers from compiler-rt, now that the necessary handlers exist.
check-ubsan test updates to follow.
llvm-svn: 297750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
correctly.
This fixes PR30413.
Patch by David Lobron.
llvm-svn: 297702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Teach UBSan to detect when a value with the _Nonnull type annotation
assumes a null value. Call expressions, initializers, assignments, and
return statements are all checked.
Because _Nonnull does not affect IRGen, the new checks are disabled by
default. The new driver flags are:
-fsanitize=nullability-arg (_Nonnull violation in call)
-fsanitize=nullability-assign (_Nonnull violation in assignment)
-fsanitize=nullability-return (_Nonnull violation in return stmt)
-fsanitize=nullability (all of the above)
This patch builds on top of UBSan's existing support for detecting
violations of the nonnull attributes ('nonnull' and 'returns_nonnull'),
and relies on the compiler-rt support for those checks. Eventually we
will need to update the diagnostic messages in compiler-rt (there are
FIXME's for this, which will be addressed in a follow-up).
One point of note is that the nullability-return check is only allowed
to kick in if all arguments to the function satisfy their nullability
preconditions. This makes it necessary to emit some null checks in the
function body itself.
Testing: check-clang and check-ubsan. I also built some Apple ObjC
frameworks with an asserts-enabled compiler, and verified that we get
valid reports.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30762
llvm-svn: 297700
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 297681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change ASTFileSignature from a random 32-bit number to the hash of the
PCM content.
- Move definition ASTFileSignature to Basic/Module.h so Module and
ASTSourceDescriptor can use it.
- Change the signature from uint64_t to std::array<uint32_t,5>.
- Stop using (saving/reading) the size and modification time of PCM
files when there is a valid SIGNATURE.
- Add UNHASHED_CONTROL_BLOCK, and use it to store the SIGNATURE record
and other records that shouldn't affect the hash. Because implicit
modules reuses the same file for multiple levels of -Werror, this
includes DIAGNOSTIC_OPTIONS and DIAG_PRAGMA_MAPPINGS.
This helps to solve a PCH + implicit Modules dependency issue: PCH files
are handled by the external build system, whereas implicit modules are
handled by internal compiler build system. This prevents invalidating a
PCH when the compiler overwrites a PCM file with the same content
(modulo the diagnostic differences).
Design and original patch by Manman Ren!
llvm-svn: 297655
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30738
llvm-svn: 297649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
x86 has undef SSE/AVX intrinsics that should represent a bogus register operand.
This is not the same as LLVM's undef value which can take on multiple bit patterns.
There are better solutions / follow-ups to this discussed here:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32176
...but this should prevent miscompiles with a one-line code change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30834
llvm-svn: 297588
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30551
llvm-svn: 297436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DIExpression for targets that support more than one address space
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29673
llvm-svn: 297397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's possible to load out-of-range values from bitfields backed by a
boolean or an enum. Check for UB loads from bitfields.
This is the motivating example:
struct S {
BOOL b : 1; // Signed ObjC BOOL.
};
S s;
s.b = 1; // This is actually stored as -1.
if (s.b == 1) // Evaluates to false, -1 != 1.
...
Changes since the original commit:
- Single-bit bools are a special case (see CGF::EmitFromMemory), and we
can't avoid dealing with them when loading from a bitfield. Don't try to
insert a check in this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30423
llvm-svn: 297389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r297298. It breaks the self-host on this bot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/962/steps/build%20clang%2Fubsan/logs/stdio
llvm-svn: 297331
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29671
llvm-svn: 297321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's possible to load out-of-range values from bitfields backed by a
boolean or an enum. Check for UB loads from bitfields.
This is the motivating example:
struct S {
BOOL b : 1; // Signed ObjC BOOL.
};
S s;
s.b = 1; // This is actually stored as -1.
if (s.b == 1) // Evaluates to false, -1 != 1.
...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30423
llvm-svn: 297298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch honors the unaligned type qualifier (currently available through he
keyword __unaligned and -fms-extensions) in CodeGen. In the current form the
patch affects declarations and expressions. It does not affect fields of
classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30166
llvm-svn: 297276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
use the category name as its DeclName
This also addresses the badness in ObjCCategoryImplDecl's API, which was hiding NamedDecl's APIs with different meaning.
llvm-svn: 297131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Because of the existence branches out of GNU statement expressions, it
is possible that emitting cleanups for a full expression may cause the
new insertion point to not be dominated by the result of the inner
expression. Consider this example:
struct Foo { Foo(); ~Foo(); int x; };
int g(Foo, int);
int f(bool cond) {
int n = g(Foo(), ({ if (cond) return 0; 42; }));
return n;
}
Before this change, result of the call to 'g' did not dominate its use
in the store to 'n'. The early return exit from the statement expression
branches to a shared cleanup block, which ends in a switch between the
fallthrough destination (the assignment to 'n') or the function exit
block.
This change solves the problem by spilling and reloading expression
evaluation results when any of the active cleanups have branches.
I audited the other call sites of enterFullExpression, and they don't
appear to keep and Values live across the site of the cleanup, except in
ARC code. I wasn't able to create a test case for ARC that exhibits this
problem, though.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30590
llvm-svn: 297084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Added co_return statement emission.
Tweaked coro-alloc.cpp test to use co_return to trigger coroutine processing instead of co_await, since this change starts emitting the body of the coroutine and await expression handling has not been upstreamed yet.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, EricWF, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29979
llvm-svn: 297076
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was requested in PR31958 and elsewhere.
llvm-svn: 297057
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 297050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
block copy/destroy routines
This is a preparation commit for work on merging unique block copy/destroy
helper functions.
rdar://22950898
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30345
llvm-svn: 297023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Functions with the "xray_log_args" attribute will tell LLVM to emit a special
XRay sled for compiler-rt to copy any call arguments to your logging handler.
Reviewers: dberris
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29704
llvm-svn: 296999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
UBSan's nonnull argument check applies when a parameter has the
"nonnull" attribute. The check currently works for FunctionDecls, but
not for ObjCMethodDecls. This patch extends the check to work for ObjC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30599
llvm-svn: 296996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
easily extend the aggregate-builder API. Stupid missing language
features.
Also add APIs for constructing a relative reference and computing
the offset of a position from the start of the initializer.
llvm-svn: 296979
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a generally useful utility for other frontends. NFC.
llvm-svn: 296806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When clang emits an inheriting C++ constructor it may inline code
during the CodeGen phase. This patch ensures that any debug info in
this inlined code gets a proper inlined location. Otherwise we can end
up with invalid debug info metadata, since all inlined local variables
and function arguments would be reparented into the call site.
Analogous to ApplyInlineLocation this patch introduces a
ApplyInlineDebugLocation scoped helper to facilitate entering an
inlined scope and cleaning up afterwards.
This fixes one of the issues discovered in PR32042.
rdar://problem/30679307
llvm-svn: 296388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a readability improvement, but it will also help prep an
upcoming patch to detect UB loads from bitfields.
llvm-svn: 296374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for special member functions.
Essentially, as a base class constructor does not construct virtual bases, such
a constructor for an abstract class does not need the corresponding base class
construction to be valid, and likewise for destructors.
This creates an awkward situation: clang will sometimes generate references to
the complete object and deleting destructors for an abstract class (it puts
them in the construction vtable for a derived class). But we can't generate a
"correct" version of these because we can't generate references to base class
constructors any more (if they're template specializations, say, we might not
have instantiated them and can't assume any other TU will emit a copy).
Fortunately, we don't need to, since no correct program can ever invoke them,
so instead emit symbols that just trap.
We should stop emitting references to these symbols, but still need to emit
definitions for compatibility.
llvm-svn: 296275
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 296246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2nd attempt: the first was in r296231, but it had a use after lifetime
bug.
Clang has logic to lower certain conditional expressions directly into llvm
select instructions. However, it does not emit the correct profile counter
increment as it does this: it emits an unconditional increment of the counter
for the 'then branch', even if the value selected is from the 'else branch'
(this is PR32019).
That means, given the following snippet, we would report that "0" is selected
twice, and that "1" is never selected:
int f1(int x) {
return x ? 0 : 1;
^2 ^0
}
f1(0);
f1(1);
Fix the problem by using the instrprof_increment_step intrinsic to do the
proper increment.
llvm-svn: 296245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(PR32019)"
This reverts commit r296231. It causes an assertion failure on 32-bit
machines
clang: /export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp:263: void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::Value*, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Value*>, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::OperandBundleDefT<llvm::Value*> >, const llvm::Twine&): Assertion `(i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Args[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"' failed.
llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) (/export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/stage1/./bin/clang+0x1c5fbfa)
llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/stage1/./bin/clang+0x1c5dc7e)
SignalHandler(int) (/export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/stage1/./bin/clang+0x1c5dde2)
__restore_rt (/lib64/libpthread.so.0+0x3f1d00efa0)
__GI_raise /home/glibctest/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.17-c758a686/signal/../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56:0
__GI_abort /home/glibctest/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.17-c758a686/stdlib/abort.c:92:0
__assert_fail_base /home/glibctest/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.17-c758a686/assert/assert.c:92:0
(/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3f1c82e622)
llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::Value*, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Value*>, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::OperandBundleDefT<llvm::Value*> >, llvm::Twine const&) (/export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/stage1/./bin/clang+0x1804e3a)
clang::CodeGen::CodeGenPGO::emitCounterIncrement(clang::CodeGen::CGBuilderTy&, clang::Stmt const*, llvm::Value*) (/export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/stage1/./bin/clang+0x1ec7891)
llvm-svn: 296234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clang has logic to lower certain conditional expressions directly into
llvm select instructions. However, it does not emit the correct profile
counter increment as it does this: it emits an unconditional increment
of the counter for the 'then branch', even if the value selected is from
the 'else branch' (this is PR32019).
That means, given the following snippet, we would report that "0" is
selected twice, and that "1" is never selected:
int f1(int x) {
return x ? 0 : 1;
^2 ^0
}
f1(0);
f1(1);
Fix the problem by using the instrprof_increment_step intrinsic to do
the proper increment.
llvm-svn: 296231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Teach ubsan to diagnose remainder operations which have undefined
behavior due to signed overflow (e.g INT_MIN % -1).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29437
llvm-svn: 296214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
C requires the operands of arithmetic expressions to be promoted if
their types are smaller than an int. Ubsan emits overflow checks when
this sort of type promotion occurs, even if there is no way to actually
get an overflow with the promoted type.
This patch teaches clang how to omit the superflous overflow checks
(addressing PR20193).
Testing: check-clang and check-ubsan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29369
llvm-svn: 296213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The goal of this is to fix a bug in modules where we'd merge
FunctionDecls that differed in their pass_object_size attributes. Since
we can overload on the presence of pass_object_size attributes, this
behavior is incorrect.
We don't represent `N` in `pass_object_size(N)` as part of
ExtParameterInfo, since it's an error to overload solely on the value of
N. This means that we have a bug if we have two modules that declare
functions that differ only in their pass_object_size attrs, like so:
// In module A, from a.h
void foo(char *__attribute__((pass_object_size(0))));
// In module B, from b.h
void foo(char *__attribute__((pass_object_size(1))));
// In module C, in main.c
#include "a.h"
#include "b.h"
At the moment, we'll merge the foo decls, when we should instead emit a
diagnostic about an invalid overload. We seem to have similar (silent)
behavior if we overload only on the return type of `foo` instead; I'll
try to find a good place to put a FIXME (or I'll just file a bug) soon.
This patch also fixes a bug where we'd not output the proper extended
parameter info for declarations with pass_object_size attrs.
llvm-svn: 296076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix the fact that we don't assign profile counters to constructors in
classes with virtual bases, or constructors with variadic parameters.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30131
llvm-svn: 296062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a preparation clean-up commit around the code that emits
block copy/dispose routines.
llvm-svn: 296054
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 296034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch makes use of the prefix/suffix ABI argument distinction that
was introduced in r295870, so that we now emit ExtParameterInfo at the
correct offset for member calls that have added ABI arguments. I don't
see a good way to test the generated param info, since we don't actually
seem to use it in CGFunctionInfo outside of Swift. Any
suggestions/thoughts for how to better test this are welcome. :)
This patch also fixes a small bug with inheriting constructors: if we
decide not to pass args into an base class ctor, we would still
generate ExtParameterInfo as though we did. The added test-case is for
that behavior.
llvm-svn: 296024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CodeGens uses of @available into calls to the compiler-rt function
__isOSVersionAtLeast.
This commit is part of a feature that I proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/049851.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27827
llvm-svn: 296015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes an assertion failure in cases where we had expression
statements that declared variables nested inside of pass_object_size
args. Since we were emitting the same ExprStmt twice (once for the arg,
once for the @llvm.objectsize call), we were getting issues with
redefining locals.
This also means that we can be more lax about when we emit
@llvm.objectsize for pass_object_size args: since we're reusing the
arg's value itself, we don't have to care so much about side-effects.
llvm-svn: 295935
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 295918
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a few assertion failures. Please see the added test case.
llvm-svn: 295894
|