| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
just letting them be implicitly created.
llvm-svn: 216528
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 216527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
statement.
Similar to r215768 (which fixed the same case for while loops). To quote
r215768's commit message:
"A little test case simplification - this could be simplified further,
though there are certainly interesting connections to the if/else
construct so I'm hesitant to remove that entirely though it does appear
somewhat unrelated.
(similar fix to r215766, related to PR19864)"
llvm-svn: 216297
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
r216288 (which was for plain-for loop condition variables).
llvm-svn: 216291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for loops introduce two scopes - one for the outer loop variable and its
initialization, and another for the body of the loop, including any
variable declared inside the loop condition.
llvm-svn: 216288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
statement.
A little test case simplification - this could be simplified further,
though there are certainly interesting connections to the if/else
construct so I'm hesitant to remove that entirely though it does appear
somewhat unrelated.
(similar fix to r215766, related to PR19864)
llvm-svn: 215768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
loop, to the start of the loop.
This avoids debuggers stepping to strange places (like the last
statement in the loop body, or the first statement in the if).
This is not the whole answer, though - similar bugs no doubt exist in
other loops (patches to follow) and attributing exception handling code
to the correct line is also tricky (based on the previous fix to
PR19864, exception handling is still erroneously attributed to the 'if'
line).
llvm-svn: 215766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch is necessary to support constant expressions which replaces the integer value in the loop hint attribute with an expression. The integer value was also storing the pragma’s state for options like vectorize(enable/disable) and the pragma unroll and nounroll directive. The state variable is introduced to hold the state of those options/pragmas. This moves the validation of the state (keywords) from SemaStmtAttr handler to the loop hint annotation token handler.
Resubmit with changes to try to fix the build-bot issue.
Reviewed by Aaron Ballman
llvm-svn: 214432
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It brought undefined behavior.
llvm-svn: 214376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch is necessary to support constant expressions which replaces the integer value in the loop hint attribute with an expression. The integer value was also storing the pragma’s state for options like vectorize(enable/disable) and the pragma unroll and nounroll directive. The state variable is introduced to hold the state of those options/pragmas. This moves the validation of the state (keywords) from SemaStmtAttr handler to the loop hint annotation token handler.
Reviewed by Aaron Ballman
llvm-svn: 214333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This isn't nearly as elaborate as the GCC inline asm which emits an
array of source locations, but it's very, very hard to trigger backend
diagnostics in MS inline asm because we parse it up front with good
source information, unlike GCC inline asm.
Currently I can trigger a "inline assembly requires more registers than
available" diagnostic with this code:
void foo();
void bar() {
__asm pusha
__asm call foo
__asm popa
}
However, if I committed that as a test case, I would have to remove it
once I fix PR20052.
llvm-svn: 214141
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
new form using the string "full".
llvm-svn: 213771
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213639
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213616
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213587
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213512
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213510
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213363
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213360
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213355
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213237
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 212804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Originally committed in r211722, this fixed one case of dtor calls being
emitted without locations (this causes problems for debug info if the
call is then inlined), this caught only some of the cases.
Instead of trying to re-enable the location before the cleanup, simply
re-enable the location immediately after the unconditional branches in
question using a scoped device to ensure the no-location state doesn't
leak out arbitrarily.
llvm-svn: 212761
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 212516
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 212453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Codegen is still missing (and I won't work on that), but __leave is now
as implemented as __try and friends.
llvm-svn: 212425
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 212162
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4067
llvm-svn: 212010
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 211774
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 211767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[Clang part]
These patches rename the loop unrolling and loop vectorizer metadata
such that they have a common 'llvm.loop.' prefix. Metadata name
changes:
llvm.vectorizer.* => llvm.loop.vectorizer.*
llvm.loopunroll.* => llvm.loop.unroll.*
This was a suggestion from an earlier review
(http://reviews.llvm.org/D4090) which added the loop unrolling
metadata.
Patch by Mark Heffernan.
llvm-svn: 211712
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 211685
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MSVC).
llvm-svn: 211140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r211096. Looks like it broke the msvc build:
SemaOpenMP.cpp(140) : error C4519: default template arguments are only allowed on a class template
llvm-svn: 211113
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 211096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4089
Patch by Mark Heffernan.
llvm-svn: 210667
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch thanks to Tyler Nowicki!
llvm-svn: 210330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since the continuation block of the if statement is emitted within the
condition scope this had the undesirable effect of creating a line table
entry at the end of the then or else statement, a line that may have never
been executed.
PR19864 / rdar://problem/17052973
llvm-svn: 209764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata.
It also adds a simple initial version of codegen for pragma omp simd (it will change in the future to support all the clauses).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3644
llvm-svn: 209411
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 209272
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 208077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
condition to a constant and emit only the relevant statement. In that
case, we were previously creating the epilog jump destination, a cleanup
scope, and emitting any condition variable into it. Instead, we can emit
the condition variable (if we have one) into the cleanup scope used for
the entire folded case sequence. We avoid creating a jump dest, a basic
block, and an extra cleanup scope. Win!
llvm-svn: 207888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CapturedStmt was being ignored by instrumentation based profiling, and
its counters attributed to the containing function. Instead, we need
to treat this as a top level entity, like we do with blocks.
llvm-svn: 206231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
are not associated with any source lines.
Previously, if the Location of a Decl was empty, EmitFunctionStart would
just keep using CurLoc, which would sometimes be correct (e.g., thunks)
but in other cases would just point to a hilariously random location.
This patch fixes this by completely eliminating all uses of CurLoc from
EmitFunctionStart and rather have clients explicitly pass in a
SourceLocation for the function header and the function body.
rdar://problem/14985269
llvm-svn: 205999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds Clang support for the ARM64 backend. There are definitely
still some rough edges, so please bring up any issues you see with
this patch.
As with the LLVM commit though, we think it'll be more useful for
merging with AArch64 from within the tree.
llvm-svn: 205100
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range decls(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
r203364: what was use_iterator is now user_iterator, and there is
a use_iterator for directly iterating over the uses.
This also switches to use the range-based APIs where appropriate.
llvm-svn: 203365
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LLVM r202816.
llvm-svn: 202817
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, we made one traversal of the AST prior to codegen to assign
counters to the ASTs and then propagated the count values during codegen. This
patch now adds a separate AST traversal prior to codegen for the
-fprofile-instr-use option to propagate the count values. The counts are then
saved in a map from which they can be retrieved during codegen.
This new approach has several advantages:
1. It gets rid of a lot of extra PGO-related code that had previously been
added to codegen.
2. It fixes a serious bug. My original implementation (which was mailed to the
list but never committed) used 3 counters for every loop. Justin improved it to
move 2 of those counters into the less-frequently executed breaks and continues,
but that turned out to produce wrong count values in some cases. The solution
requires visiting a loop body before the condition so that the count for the
condition properly includes the break and continue counts. Changing codegen to
visit a loop body first would be a fairly invasive change, but with a separate
AST traversal, it is easy to control the order of traversal. I've added a
testcase (provided by Justin) to make sure this works correctly.
3. It improves the instrumentation overhead, reducing the number of counters for
a loop from 3 to 1. We no longer need dedicated counters for breaks and
continues, since we can just use the propagated count values when visiting
breaks and continues.
To make this work, I needed to make a change to the way we count case
statements, going back to my original approach of not including the fall-through
in the counter values. This was necessary because there isn't always an AST node
that can be used to record the fall-through count. Now case statements are
handled the same as default statements, with the fall-through paths branching
over the counter increments. While I was at it, I also went back to using this
approach for do-loops -- omitting the fall-through count into the loop body
simplifies some of the calculations and make them behave the same as other
loops. Whenever we start using this instrumentation for coverage, we'll need
to add the fall-through counts into the counter values.
llvm-svn: 201528
|