| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r225000, r225021, r225083, r225086, r225090.
The root change (r225000) still has several issues where it's caused
calls to be emitted without debug locations. This causes assertion
failures if/when those calls are inlined.
I'll work up some test cases and fixes before recommitting this.
llvm-svn: 225555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns
this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the
crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling
changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of
the more general solution).
Recommitted in r224941 and reverted in r224970 after it caused a crash
when building compiler-rt. Looks to be due to this change zeroing out
the debug location when emitting default arguments (which were meant to
inherit their outer expression's location) thus creating call
instructions without locations - these create problems for inlining and
must not be created. That is fixed and tested in this version of the
change.
Original commit message:
This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many
places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to
several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for
subexpressions.
This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the
SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting
was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end
of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope
than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The
drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally
CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current
SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm
going to tackle removing that just now.
I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll
investigate that as it comes up.
Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug
in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for
statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one
statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and
two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one
statement.
I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would
help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each
statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the
lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some
problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers.
llvm-svn: 225000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Asserting when building compiler-rt when using a GCC host compiler.
Reverting while I investigate.
This reverts commit r224941.
llvm-svn: 224970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns
this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the
crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling
changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of
the more general solution).
Original commit message:
This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many
places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to
several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for
subexpressions.
This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the
SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting
was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end
of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope
than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The
drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally
CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current
SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm
going to tackle removing that just now.
I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll
investigate that as it comes up.
Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug
in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for
statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one
statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and
two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one
statement.
I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would
help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each
statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the
lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some
problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers.
llvm-svn: 224941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fails an ASan bootstrap - I'll try to reproduce locally & sort that out
before recommitting.
This reverts commit r224385.
llvm-svn: 224441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many
places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to
several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for
subexpressions.
This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the
SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting
was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end
of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope
than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The
drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally
CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current
SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm
going to tackle removing that just now.
I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll
investigate that as it comes up.
Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug
in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for
statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one
statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and
two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one
statement.
I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would
help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each
statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the
lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some
problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers.
llvm-svn: 224385
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Especially useful for sanitizer reports.
llvm-svn: 223825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
elements
This particularly helps the fidelity of ASan reports (which can occur
even in these examples - if, for example, one uses placement new over a
buffer of insufficient size - now ASan will correctly identify which
member's initialization went over the end of the buffer).
This doesn't cover all types of members - more coming.
llvm-svn: 223726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
When -fsanitize-address-field-padding=1 is present
don't emit memcpy for copy constructor.
Thanks Nico for the extra test case.
Test Plan: regression tests
Reviewers: thakis, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6515
llvm-svn: 223563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We currently use i32 (...)** as the type of the vptr field in the LLVM
struct type. LLVM's GlobalOpt prefers any bitcasts to be on the side of
the data being stored rather than on the pointer being stored to.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5916
llvm-svn: 223267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Consider this program:
struct A {
virtual void operator-() { printf("base\n"); }
};
struct B final : public A {
virtual void operator-() override { printf("derived\n"); }
};
int main() {
B* b = new B;
-static_cast<A&>(*b);
}
Before this patch, clang saw the virtual call to A::operator-(), figured out
that it can be devirtualized, and then just called A::operator-() directly,
without going through the vtable. Instead, it should've looked up which
operator-() the call devirtualizes to and should've called that.
For regular virtual member calls, clang gets all this right already. So
instead of giving EmitCXXOperatorMemberCallee() all the logic that
EmitCXXMemberCallExpr() already has, cut the latter function into two pieces,
call the second piece EmitCXXMemberOrOperatorMemberCallExpr(), and use it also
to generate code for calls to virtual member operators.
This way, virtual overloaded operators automatically don't get devirtualized
if they have covariant returns (like it was done for regular calls in r218602),
etc.
This also happens to fix (or at least improve) codegen for explicit constructor
calls (`A a; a.A::A()`) in MS mode with -fsanitize-address-field-padding=1.
(This adjustment for virtual operator calls seems still wrong with the MS ABI.)
llvm-svn: 223185
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
pair<iterator, bool> as per the C++ standard's associative container concept.
llvm-svn: 222335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Get rid of ugly SanitizerOptions class thrust into LangOptions:
* Make SanitizeAddressFieldPadding a regular language option,
and rely on default behavior to initialize/reset it.
* Make SanitizerBlacklistFile a regular member LangOptions.
* Introduce the helper class "SanitizerSet" to represent the
set of enabled sanitizers and make it a member of LangOptions.
It is exactly the entity we want to cache and modify in CodeGenFunction,
for instance. We'd also be able to reuse SanitizerSet in
CodeGenOptions for storing the set of recoverable sanitizers,
and in the Driver to represent the set of sanitizers
turned on/off by the commandline flags.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 221653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use the bitmask to store the set of enabled sanitizers instead of a
bitfield. On the negative side, it makes syntax for querying the
set of enabled sanitizers a bit more clunky. On the positive side, we
will be able to use SanitizerKind to eventually implement the
new semantics for -fsanitize-recover= flag, that would allow us
to make some sanitizers recoverable, and some non-recoverable.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 221558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SanitizerOptions is not even a POD now, so having global variable of
this type, is not nice. Instead, provide a regular constructor and clear()
method, and let each CodeGenFunction has its own copy of SanitizerOptions
it uses.
llvm-svn: 220920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Correctly compute the non-virtual size of a class.
Test Plan: Build SPEC 2016 with -fsanitize-address-field-padding
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5848
llvm-svn: 220089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AddressSanitizer can find intra-object-overflow bugs
Summary:
The general approach is to add extra paddings after every field
in AST/RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp, then add code to CTORs/DTORs that poisons the paddings
(CodeGen/CGClass.cpp).
Everything is done under the flag -fsanitize-address-field-padding.
The blacklist file (-fsanitize-blacklist) allows to avoid the transformation
for given classes or source files.
See also https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/IntraObjectOverflow
Test Plan: run SPEC2006 and some of the Chromium tests with -fsanitize-address-field-padding
Reviewers: samsonov, rnk, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5687
llvm-svn: 219961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We assumed the last argument of the copy constructor was the this
pointer. However, this is not the case under the MS ABI.
llvm-svn: 219775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change adds UBSan check to upcasts. Namely, when we
perform derived-to-base conversion, we:
1) check that the pointer-to-derived has suitable alignment
and underlying storage, if this pointer is non-null.
2) if vptr-sanitizer is enabled, and we perform conversion to
virtual base, we check that pointer-to-derived has a matching vptr.
llvm-svn: 219642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's possible to construct cases where the first field we are trying to
copy is in the middle of an IR field. In some complicated cases, we
would fail to use an appropriate offset inside the object. Earlier
builds of clang seemed to miscompile the code by copying an insufficient
number of bytes. Up until now, we would assert: the copying offset was
insufficiently aligned.
This fixes PR21232.
llvm-svn: 219524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are situations when clang knows that the C1 and C2 constructors
or the D1 and D2 destructors are identical. We already optimize some
of these cases, but cannot optimize it when the GlobalValue is
weak_odr.
The problem with weak_odr is that an old TU seeing the same code will
have a C1 and a C2 comdat with the corresponding symbols. We cannot
suddenly start putting the C2 symbol in the C1 comdat as we cannot
guarantee that the linker will not pick a .o with only C1 in it.
The solution implemented by GCC is to expand the ABI to have a comdat
whose name uses a C5/D5 suffix and always has both symbols. That is
what this patch implements.
llvm-svn: 217874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We assumed that the incoming this argument would be the last argument.
However, this is not true under the MS ABI.
This fixes PR20897.
llvm-svn: 217642
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 217598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch implements a new UBSan check, which verifies
that function arguments declared to be nonnull with __attribute__((nonnull))
are actually nonnull in runtime.
To implement this check, we pass FunctionDecl to CodeGenFunction::EmitCallArgs
(where applicable) and if function declaration has nonnull attribute specified
for a certain formal parameter, we compare the corresponding RValue to null as
soon as it's calculated.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5082
llvm-svn: 217389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There were code paths that are duplicated for constructors and destructors just
because we have both CXXCtorType and CXXDtorsTypes.
This patch introduces an unified enum and reduces code deplication a bit.
llvm-svn: 217383
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 216635
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 216479
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
into EmitSynthesizedCXXCopyCtorCall. No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 216410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is a first small step towards passing generic "Expr" instead of
ArgBeg/ArgEnd pair into EmitCallArgs() family of methods. Having "Expr" will
allow us to get the corresponding FunctionDecl and its ParmVarDecls,
thus allowing us to alter CodeGen depending on the function/parameter
attributes.
No functionality change.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: aemerson, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4915
llvm-svn: 216214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
they're somehow missing a body. Looks like this was left behind when the loop
was generalized, and it's not been problematic before because without modules,
a used, implicit special member function declaration must be a definition.
This was resulting in us trying to emit a constructor declaration rather than
a definition, and producing a constructor missing its member initializers.
llvm-svn: 214473
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 211764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This implements the central part of support for dllimport/dllexport on
classes: allowing the attribute on class declarations, inheriting it
to class members, and forcing emission of exported members. It's based
on Nico Rieck's patch from http://reviews.llvm.org/D1099.
This patch doesn't propagate dllexport to bases that are template
specializations, which is an interesting problem. It also doesn't
look at the rules when redeclaring classes with different attributes,
I'd like to do that separately.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3877
llvm-svn: 209908
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 209272
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range body(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 204040
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with iterator_range vbases(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203808
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range bases(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203803
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
class.
llvm-svn: 203643
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range fields(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203355
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Smith.
llvm-svn: 203262
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with iterator_range chains(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203261
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range params(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203250
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator_range params(). Updating all of the usages of the iterators with range-based for loops.
llvm-svn: 203248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a non-trivial parameter is present, clang now gathers up all the
parameters that lack inreg and puts them into a packed struct. MSVC
always aligns each parameter to 4 bytes and no more, so this is a pretty
simple struct to lay out.
On win64, non-trivial records are passed indirectly. Prior to this
change, clang was incorrectly using byval on win64.
I'm able to self-host a working clang with this change and additional
LLVM patches.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2636
llvm-svn: 200597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 199864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes PR18435, where we generated a base ctor instead of a complete
ctor, and so failed to construct virtual bases when constructing the
complete object.
llvm-svn: 199160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 197544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unlike Itanium's VTTs, the 'most derived' boolean or bitfield is the
last parameter for non-variadic constructors, rather than the second.
For variadic constructors, the 'most derived' parameter comes after the
'this' parameter. This affects constructor calls and constructor decls
in a variety of places.
Reviewers: timurrrr
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2405
llvm-svn: 197518
|