| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin, martong
Reviewed By: a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, jdoerfert, davide, aprantl, llvm-commits, gamesh411, a_sidorin, dkrupp, martong, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53818
llvm-svn: 355598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Member expressions with explicit template arguments were not imported
correctly: the DeclRefExpr was missing. This patch fixes.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58830
llvm-svn: 355596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Redecl chains of function templates are not handled well currently. We
want to handle them similarly to functions, i.e. try to keep the
structure of the original AST as much as possible. The aim is to not
squash a prototype with a definition, rather we create both and put them
in a redecl chain.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58494
llvm-svn: 355593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently GCC allows this, and there's code relying on it (see bug).
The idea is to allow expression that would have been allowed if they
were cast to int. So I based the code on how such a cast would be done
(the CK_PointerToIntegral case in IntExprEvaluator::VisitCastExpr()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58821
llvm-svn: 355491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This reverts rL352390 / D57280.
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112#inline-506781,
'flush' clause does not exist in the OpenMP spec, it can not be
specified, and `OMPFlushClause` class is just a helper class.
Now, here's the caveat. I have read @ABataev's
> Well, I think it would be good to filter out OMPC_flush somehow
> because there is no such clause actually, it is a pseudo clause
> for better handling of the flush directive.
as if that clause is pseudo clause that only exists for the sole
purpose of simplifying the parser. As in, it never reaches AST.
I did not however try to verify that. Too bad, i was wrong.
It absolutely *does* reach AST. Therefore my understanding/justification
for the change was flawed, which makes the patch a regression which **must** be reverted.
@gribozavr has brought that up again in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112#inline-521238
> > ...
> Sorry to be late for this discussion, but I don't think this conclusion
> follows. ASTMatchers are supposed to match the AST as it is.
> Even if OMPC_flush is synthetic, it exists in the AST, and users might
> want to match it. I think users would find anything else (trying to filter
> out AST nodes that are not in the source code) to be surprising. For example,
> there's a matcher materializeTemporaryExpr even though this AST node is a
> Clang invention and is not a part of the C++ spec.
>
> Matching only constructs that appear in the source code is not feasible with
> ASTMatchers, because they are based on Clang's AST that exposes tons of semantic
> information, and its design is dictated by the structure of the semantic information.
> See "RFC: Tree-based refactorings with Clang" in cfe-dev for a library that will
> focus on representing source code as faithfully as possible.
>
> Not to even mention that this code is in ASTTypeTraits, a general library for
> handling AST nodes, not specifically for AST Matchers...
Reviewers: gribozavr, ABataev, rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: gribozavr, ABataev
Subscribers: dylanmckay, guansong, arphaman, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, gribozavr, ABataev
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58979
llvm-svn: 355486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch includes the necessary code for converting between a fixed point type and integer.
This also includes constant expression evaluation for conversions with these types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56900
llvm-svn: 355462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Redecl chains of classes and class templates are not handled well
currently. We want to handle them similarly to functions, i.e. try to
keep the structure of the original AST as much as possible. The aim is
to not squash a prototype with a definition, rather we create both and
put them in a redecl chain.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58502
llvm-svn: 355390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Currently when we see a built-in we try and import the include location. Instead what we do now is find the buffer like we do for the invalid case and copy that over to the to context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58743
llvm-svn: 355332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On SPIR targets, the default calling convention is SpirFunction.
However, operator new/delete and builtins were being created with CC_C.
The result is indirect references to new/delete (or builtins that are permitted
to be called indirectly have a mismatched type, as well as questionable codegen
in some cases.
This patch sets both to the default calling convention, so that it
properly matches the calling convention of the target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58844
Change-Id: I52065bb00bc2655945caea8f29c409ba1e0ac24a
llvm-svn: 355317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the type is unsupported on the device side, it still must be emitted,
but we should emit errors for operations with such types.
llvm-svn: 355027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
initializes a local auto variable or is assigned to a local auto
variable that is declared in the scope that introduced the block
literal.
rdar://problem/13289333
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58514
llvm-svn: 355012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Even if the content cache has a directory and filename, it may be a virtual file.
The old code returned with error in this case, but it is worth to try to handle
the file as it were a memory buffer.
Reviewers: a.sidorin, shafik, martong, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: efriedma, rnkovacs, cfe-commits, dkrupp, martong, Szelethus, gamesh411
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57590
llvm-svn: 355000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain ChooseExpr (the GNU
__builtin_choose_expr construction). This is needed, for example, for
cross-CTU analysis of C code that makes use of __builtin_choose_expr.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter.
This was originally reviewed and approved in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58292 and submitted as r354832. It was
reverted in r354839 due to failures on the Windows CI builds.
This version fixes the test failures on Windows, which were caused by
differences in template expansion between versions of clang on different
OSes. The version of clang built with MSVC and running on Windows never
expands the template in the C++ test in ImportExpr.ImportChooseExpr in
clang/unittests/AST/ASTImporter.cpp, but the version on Linux does for
the empty arguments and -fms-compatibility.
So, this version of the patch drops the C++ test for
__builtin_choose_expr, since that version was written to catch
regressions of the logic for isConditionTrue() in the AST import code
for ChooseExpr, and those regressions are also caught by
ASTImporterOptionSpecificTestBase.ImportChooseExpr, which does work on
Windows.
Reviewers: shafik, a_sidorin, martong, aaron.ballman, rnk, a.sidorin
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jdoerfert, rnkovacs, aaron.ballman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58663
llvm-svn: 354916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A recent change caused assertion in CodeGenFunction::EmitBlockCallExpr when a block is called.
There is code
Func = CGM.getOpenCLRuntime().getInvokeFunction(E->getCallee());
getCalleeDecl calls Expr::getReferencedDeclOfCallee, which does not handle
BlockExpr and returns nullptr, which causes isa to assert.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58658
llvm-svn: 354893
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Test does not pass on Windows
llvm-svn: 354839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain ChooseExpr (the GNU
__builtin_choose_expr construction). This is needed, for example, for
cross-CTU analysis of C code that makes use of __builtin_choose_expr.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter.
Reviewers: shafik, a_sidorin, martong, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, rnkovacs, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58292
llvm-svn: 354832
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit e50038e4dc53caee1acc811362ac0b15e00ef5eb.
llvm-svn: 354827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch implements the parsing and sema support for the OpenMP
'from'-clause with potential user-defined mappers attached.
User-defined mappers are a new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A 'from'-clause
can have an explicit or implicit associated mapper, which instructs the
compiler to generate and use customized mapping functions. An example is
shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len])
struct S ss;
#pragma omp target update from(mapper(id): ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss from device
Contributed-by: Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58638
llvm-svn: 354817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r354795, I suspect it is causing test failures
on MSan sanitizer bots.
llvm-svn: 354812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Fixes a data race and makes it possible to run clang-based tools in
multithreaded environment with TSan.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, riccibruno
Reviewed By: riccibruno
Subscribers: riccibruno, jfb, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58612
llvm-svn: 354795
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 354741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch implements the parsing and sema support for OpenMP to clause
with potential user-defined mappers attached. User defined mapper is a
new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A to/from clause can have an explicit or
implicit associated mapper, which instructs the compiler to generate and
use customized mapping functions. An example is shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len])
struct S ss;
#pragma omp target update to(mapper(id): ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss to device
Contributed-by: <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58523
llvm-svn: 354698
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks to Yuriy Solodkyy for letting us know the mangling here.
llvm-svn: 354633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch implements fixed point comparisons with other fixed point types and
integers. This also provides constant expression evaluation for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57219
llvm-svn: 354621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch implements the parsing and sema support for OpenMP map
clauses with potential user-defined mapper attached. User defined mapper
is a new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A map clause can have an explicit or
implicit associated mapper, which instructs the compiler to generate
extra data mapping. An example is shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len])
struct S ss;
#pragma omp target map(mapper(id) tofrom: ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss
Contributed-by: Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58074
llvm-svn: 354347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57910
llvm-svn: 354267
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All cases in the switch are covered. NFC.
llvm-svn: 354233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Originally commited in r354215 and reverted in r354216 because of a
missed failing clang-tidy test (fix in r354228))
Now that the implementation of all of the Expr::Ignore* is in Expr.cpp
we can try to remove some duplication. Do this by separating the logic
of the Expr::Ignore* from the iterative loop.
This is NFC, except for one change: IgnoreParenImpCasts now skips,
among other things, everything that IgnoreImpCasts skips. This means
FullExpr are now skipped by IgnoreParenImpCasts. This was likely an
oversight when FullExpr was added to the nodes skipped by IgnoreImpCasts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57267
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman (with comments from void and rnk)
llvm-svn: 354232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This breaks some clang-tidy checks. For some reason they were
not included in check-clang ?
llvm-svn: 354216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that the implementation of all of the Expr::Ignore* is in Expr.cpp
we can try to remove some duplication. Do this by separating the logic of
the Expr::Ignore* from the iterative loop.
This is NFC, except for one change: IgnoreParenImpCasts now skips, among
other things, everything that IgnoreImpCasts skips. This means FullExpr
are now skipped by IgnoreParenImpCasts. This was likely an oversight when
FullExpr was added to the nodes skipped by IgnoreImpCasts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57267
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman (with comments from void and rnk)
llvm-svn: 354215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
...instead of just comparing rank. Also, fix a bad warning about
_Float16, since its declared out of order in BuiltinTypes.def,
meaning comparing rank using BuiltinType::getKind() is incorrect.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58254
llvm-svn: 354190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes the warning about incompatible pointer types on assigning to a
subclass of type argument an expression of type `__kindof TypeParam`.
We already have a mechanism in `ASTContext::canAssignObjCInterfaces`
that handles `ObjCObjectType` with `__kindof`. But it wasn't triggered
because during type substitution `__kindof TypeParam` was represented as
`AttributedType` with attribute `ObjCKindOf` and equivalent type
`TypeArg`. For assignment type checking we use canonical types so
attributed type was desugared and the attribute was ignored.
The fix is in checking transformed `AttributedType` and pushing
`__kindof` down into `ObjCObjectType` when necessary.
rdar://problem/38514910
Reviewers: ahatanak, erik.pilkington, doug.gregor
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, manmanren, jordan_rose, doug.gregor, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57076
llvm-svn: 354189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Switch to the inheritance-based visitor from the lambda-based visitor to
allow both preorder and postorder customizations during type
transformation. NFC intended.
Reviewers: ahatanak, erik.pilkington
Reviewed By: erik.pilkington
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57075
llvm-svn: 354180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`QualType::substObjCTypeArgs` doesn't go past non-canonical types and as
the result misses some of the substitutions like `ObjCTypeParamType`.
Update `SimpleTransformVisitor` to traverse past the type sugar.
Reviewers: ahatanak, erik.pilkington
Reviewed By: erik.pilkington
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57270
llvm-svn: 354164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Previously only the fields were imported. Now every Decl is imported.
This way the destructor decl is not missing after import.
Patch by balazske (Balázs Kéri)
Reviewers: a.sidorin, shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: balazske, cfe-commits, Szelethus, martong, dkrupp
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57740
llvm-svn: 354120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
expression is a discarded-value expression.
Summary:
We used to get this wrong in three ways:
1) During parsing, an expression-statement followed by the }) ending a
statement expression was always treated as producing the value of the
statement expression. That's wrong for ({ if (1) expr; })
2) During template instantiation, various kinds of statement (most
statements not appearing directly in a compound-statement) were not
treated as discarded-value expressions, resulting in missing volatile
loads (etc).
3) In all contexts, an expression-statement with attributes was not
treated as producing the value of the statement expression, eg
({ [[attr]] expr; }).
Also fix incorrect enforcement of OpenMP rule that directives can "only
be placed in the program at a position where ignoring or deleting the
directive would result in a program with correct syntax". In particular,
a label (be it goto, case, or default) should not affect whether
directives are permitted.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57984
llvm-svn: 354090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
During import of a global variable with external visibility the lookup
will find variables (with the same name) but with static visibility.
Clearly, we cannot put them into the same redecl chain. The same is
true in case of functions. In this fix we filter the lookup results and
consider only those which have the same visibility as the decl we
currently import.
We consider two decls in two anonymous namsepaces to have the same
visibility only if they are imported from the very same translation
unit.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: jdoerfert, balazske, rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57232
llvm-svn: 354027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This makes it consistent with `memcmp` and `__builtin_bcmp`.
Also see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D56593.
Reviewers: jyknight
Subscribers: kristina, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58120
llvm-svn: 354023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
__hipRegisterFunction and __hipRegisterVar need to accept device side kernel and variable names
so that HIP runtime can associate kernel stub functions in host code with kernel symbols in fat binaries,
and associate shadow variables in host code with device variables in fat binaries.
Currently, clang assumes kernel functions and device variables have the same name as the kernel
stub functions and shadow variables. However, when host is compiled in windows with MSVC C++
ABI and device is compiled with Itanium C++ ABI (e.g. AMDGPU), kernels and device symbols in fat
binary are mangled differently than host.
This patch gets the device side kernel and variable name by mangling them in the mangle context
of aux target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58163
llvm-svn: 354004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40658
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58056
llvm-svn: 353931
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 353635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I assumed lvalue-to-rvalue conversions of array type would never
happen, but apparently clang-tidy tries in some cases.
llvm-svn: 353598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows substantially simplifying the expression evaluation code,
because we don't have to special-case lvalues which are actually string
literal initialization.
This currently throws away an optimization where we would avoid creating
an array APValue for string literal initialization. If we really want
to optimize this case, we should fix APValue so it can store simple
arrays more efficiently, like llvm::ConstantDataArray. This shouldn't
affect the memory usage for other string literals. (Not sure if this is
a blocker; I don't think string literal init is common enough for this
to be a serious issue, but I could be wrong.)
The change to test/CodeGenObjC/encode-test.m is a weird side-effect of
these changes: we currently don't constant-evaluate arrays in C, so the
strlen call shouldn't be folded, but lvalue string init managed to get
around that check. I this this is fine.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40430 .
llvm-svn: 353569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of the array type itself.
This fixes a bug found by inspection that was introduced in r353459. I
don't have a test case for this since we don't yet have types that would
make the containing C struct non-trivial to copy/move but wouldn't make
it non-trivial to default-initialize or destruct.
llvm-svn: 353556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Operators kind was not checked, so we reported e.g. op- to be equal with op+
Reviewers: shafik, a_sidorin, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57902
llvm-svn: 353504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes a bug where clang doesn’t reject union fields of
non-trivial C struct types. For example:
```
// This struct is non-trivial under ARC.
struct S0 {
id x;
};
union U0 {
struct S0 s0; // clang should reject this.
struct S0 s1; // clang should reject this.
};
void test(union U0 a) {
// Previously, both 'a.s0.x' and 'a.s1.x' were released in this
// function.
}
```
rdar://problem/46677858
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55659
llvm-svn: 353459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For global variables with unordered initialization that are instantiated
within a module, we previously did not emit the global (or its
initializer) at all unless it was used in the importing translation unit
(and sometimes not even then!), leading to misbehavior and link errors.
We now emit the initializer for an instantiated global variable with
unordered initialization with side-effects in a module into every
translation unit that imports the module. This is unfortunate, but
mostly matches the behavior of a non-modular compilation and seems to be
the best that we can reasonably do.
llvm-svn: 353240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The description of what the various Expr::Ignore* do has drifted from the
actual implementation.
Inspection reveals that IgnoreParenImpCasts() is not equivalent to doing
IgnoreParens() + IgnoreImpCasts() until reaching a fixed point, but
IgnoreParenCasts() is equivalent to doing IgnoreParens() + IgnoreCasts()
until reaching a fixed point. There is also a fair amount of duplication
in the various Expr::Ignore* functions which increase the chance of further
future inconsistencies. In preparation for the next patch which will factor
out the implementation of the various Expr::Ignore*, do the following cleanups:
Remove Stmt::IgnoreImplicit, in favor of Expr::IgnoreImplicit. IgnoreImplicit
is the only function among all of the Expr::Ignore* which is available in Stmt.
There are only a few users of Stmt::IgnoreImplicit. They can just use instead
Expr::IgnoreImplicit like they have to do for the other Ignore*.
Move Expr::IgnoreImpCasts() from Expr.h to Expr.cpp. This made no difference
in the run-time with my usual benchmark (-fsyntax-only on all of Boost).
While we are at it, make IgnoreParenNoopCasts take a const reference to the
ASTContext for const correctness.
Update the comments to match what the Expr::Ignore* are actually doing.
I am not sure that listing exactly what each Expr::Ignore* do is optimal,
but it certainly looks better than the current state which is in my opinion
between misleading and just plain wrong.
The whole patch is NFC (if you count removing Stmt::IgnoreImplicit as NFC).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57266
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 353006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is currently no way to distinguish implicit from explicit
CXXThisExpr in the AST dump output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57649
Reviewed By: steveire
llvm-svn: 353003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This new traverser class allows clients to re-use the traversal logic
which was previously part of ASTDumper. This means that alternative
visit logic may be implemented, such as
* Dump to alternative data formats such as JSON
* Implement AST Matcher parent/child visitation matching AST dumps
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jfb, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57472
llvm-svn: 352989
|