| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
construct.
OpenMP 5.0 introduced new clause for declare target directive, device_type clause, which may accept values host, nohost, and any. Host means
that the function must be emitted only for the host, nohost - only for
the device, and any - for both, device and the host.
llvm-svn: 369775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Added support for basic analysis of the linear variables and linear step
expression. Linear loop iteration variables must be excluded from this
analysis, only non-loop iteration variables must be analyzed.
Reviewers: NoQ
Subscribers: guansong, cfe-commits, caomhin, kkwli0
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65461
llvm-svn: 368295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Added support for analysis of if clauses in the OpenMP directives to be
able to check for the use of uninitialized variables.
Reviewers: NoQ
Subscribers: guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, caomhin, kkwli0, cfe-commits
Tags: clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64646
llvm-svn: 366211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit rL366068.
The patch broke 86 tests under clang/test/OpenMP/ when run with address sanitizer.
llvm-svn: 366169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Added support for analysis of if clauses in the OpenMP directives to be
able to check for the use of uninitialized variables.
Reviewers: NoQ
Subscribers: guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, caomhin, kkwli0, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64646
llvm-svn: 366068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
programs.
Summary:
Some OpenMP clauses rely on the values of the variables. If the variable
is not initialized and used in OpenMP clauses that depend on the
variables values, it should be reported that the uninitialized variable
is used in the OpenMP clause expression.
This patch adds initial processing for uninitialized variables in OpenMP
constructs. Currently, it checks for use of the uninitialized variables
in the structured blocks.
Reviewers: NoQ, Szelethus, dcoughlin, xazax.hun, a.sidorin, george.karpenkov, szepet
Subscribers: rnkovacs, guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64356
llvm-svn: 365786
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added parsing/sema analysis of the allocate clause.
llvm-svn: 357068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added parsing/sema analysis/serialization/deserialization for the
'allocator' clause of the 'allocate' directive.
llvm-svn: 355952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added parsing/sema analysis/serialization/deserialization support for
'allocate' directive.
llvm-svn: 355614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This reverts rL352390 / D57280.
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112#inline-506781,
'flush' clause does not exist in the OpenMP spec, it can not be
specified, and `OMPFlushClause` class is just a helper class.
Now, here's the caveat. I have read @ABataev's
> Well, I think it would be good to filter out OMPC_flush somehow
> because there is no such clause actually, it is a pseudo clause
> for better handling of the flush directive.
as if that clause is pseudo clause that only exists for the sole
purpose of simplifying the parser. As in, it never reaches AST.
I did not however try to verify that. Too bad, i was wrong.
It absolutely *does* reach AST. Therefore my understanding/justification
for the change was flawed, which makes the patch a regression which **must** be reverted.
@gribozavr has brought that up again in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112#inline-521238
> > ...
> Sorry to be late for this discussion, but I don't think this conclusion
> follows. ASTMatchers are supposed to match the AST as it is.
> Even if OMPC_flush is synthetic, it exists in the AST, and users might
> want to match it. I think users would find anything else (trying to filter
> out AST nodes that are not in the source code) to be surprising. For example,
> there's a matcher materializeTemporaryExpr even though this AST node is a
> Clang invention and is not a part of the C++ spec.
>
> Matching only constructs that appear in the source code is not feasible with
> ASTMatchers, because they are based on Clang's AST that exposes tons of semantic
> information, and its design is dictated by the structure of the semantic information.
> See "RFC: Tree-based refactorings with Clang" in cfe-dev for a library that will
> focus on representing source code as faithfully as possible.
>
> Not to even mention that this code is in ASTTypeTraits, a general library for
> handling AST nodes, not specifically for AST Matchers...
Reviewers: gribozavr, ABataev, rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: gribozavr, ABataev
Subscribers: dylanmckay, guansong, arphaman, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, gribozavr, ABataev
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58979
llvm-svn: 355486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch implements the parsing and sema support for the OpenMP
'from'-clause with potential user-defined mappers attached.
User-defined mappers are a new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A 'from'-clause
can have an explicit or implicit associated mapper, which instructs the
compiler to generate and use customized mapping functions. An example is
shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len])
struct S ss;
#pragma omp target update from(mapper(id): ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss from device
Contributed-by: Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58638
llvm-svn: 354817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch implements the parsing and sema support for OpenMP to clause
with potential user-defined mappers attached. User defined mapper is a
new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A to/from clause can have an explicit or
implicit associated mapper, which instructs the compiler to generate and
use customized mapping functions. An example is shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len])
struct S ss;
#pragma omp target update to(mapper(id): ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss to device
Contributed-by: <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58523
llvm-svn: 354698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch implements the parsing and sema support for OpenMP map
clauses with potential user-defined mapper attached. User defined mapper
is a new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A map clause can have an explicit or
implicit associated mapper, which instructs the compiler to generate
extra data mapping. An example is shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len])
struct S ss;
#pragma omp target map(mapper(id) tofrom: ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss
Contributed-by: Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58074
llvm-svn: 354347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112#inline-506781,
'flush' clause does not exist in the OpenMP spec, it can not be
specified, and `OMPFlushClause` class is just a helper class.
Therefore `OPENMP_CLAUSE()` in `clang/Basic/OpenMPKinds.def`
should not contain 'flush' "clause".
I have simply removed the `OPENMP_CLAUSE(flush, OMPFlushClause)`
from `clang/Basic/OpenMPKinds.def`, grepped for `OPENMP_CLAUSE`
and added `OPENMP_CLAUSE(flush, OMPFlushClause)` back to the **every**
place where `OPENMP_CLAUSE` is defined and `clang/Basic/OpenMPKinds.def`
is then included.
So as-is, this patch is a NFC. Possibly, some of these
`OPENMP_CLAUSE(flush, OMPFlushClause)` should be dropped,
i don't really know.
Test plan: `ninja check-clang`
Reviewers: ABataev
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: guansong, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57280
llvm-svn: 352390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A map clause with the close map-type-modifier is a hint to
prefer that the variables are mapped using a copy into faster
memory.
Patch by Ahsan Saghir (saghir)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55719
llvm-svn: 349551
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also renamed test files relating to 'requires'. Differntial review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53513
llvm-svn: 345967
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53102
llvm-svn: 344740
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53079
llvm-svn: 344249
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 343711
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 343472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add support for OMP5.0 requires directive and unified_address clause.
Patches to follow will include support for additional clauses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52359
llvm-svn: 343063
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 342666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The number of loops associated with the OpenMP loop constructs should
not be considered as the number loops to collapse.
llvm-svn: 339603
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r339568 because of the problems with the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 339574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The number of loops associated with the OpenMP loop constructs should
not be considered as the number loops to collapse.
llvm-svn: 339568
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 330270
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 319384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
directives.
The argument of the `device` clause in target-based executable
directives must be captured to support codegen for the `target`
directives with the `depend` clauses.
llvm-svn: 314686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added codegen for task-based directive with in_reduction clause.
```
<body>
```
The next code is emitted:
```
void *td;
...
td = call i8* @__kmpc_task_reduction_init();
...
<type> *priv = (<type> *)call i8* @__kmpc_task_reduction_get_th_data(i32
GTID, i8* td, i8* <orig>)
```
llvm-svn: 309270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Parsing/sema analysis for 'in_reduction' clause for task-based
directives.
llvm-svn: 308768
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Parsing/sema analysis of the 'task_reduction' clause.
llvm-svn: 308352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The thread_limit-clause on the combined directive applies to the
'teams' region of this construct. We modify the ThreadLimitClause
class to capture the clause expression within the 'target' region.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29087
llvm-svn: 293049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The num_teams-clause on the combined directive applies to the
'teams' region of this construct. We modify the NumTeamsClause
class to capture the clause expression within the 'target' region.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29085
llvm-svn: 293048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The num_threads-clause on the combined directive applies to the
'parallel' region of this construct. We modify the NumThreadsClause
class to capture the clause expression within the 'target' region.
The offload runtime call for 'target parallel' is changed to
__tgt_target_teams() with 1 team and the number of threads set by
this clause or a default if none.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29082
llvm-svn: 292997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The if-clause on the combined directive potentially applies to both the
'target' and the 'parallel' regions. Codegen'ing the if-clause on the
combined directive requires additional support because the expression in
the clause must be captured by the 'target' capture statement but not
the 'parallel' capture statement. Note that this situation arises for
other clauses such as num_threads.
The OMPIfClause class inherits OMPClauseWithPreInit to support capturing
of expressions in the clause. A member CaptureRegion is added to
OMPClauseWithPreInit to indicate which captured statement (in this case
'target' but not 'parallel') captures these expressions.
To ensure correct codegen of captured expressions in the presence of
combined 'target' directives, OMPParallelScope was added to 'parallel'
codegen.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28781
llvm-svn: 292437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This patch adds support for the is_device_ptr clause. It expands SEMA to use the mappable expression logic that can only be tested with code generation in place and check conflicts with other data sharing related clauses using the mappable expressions infrastructure.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, arpith-jacob, kkwli0, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22788
llvm-svn: 276978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This patch adds support for the use_device_ptr clause. It includes changes in SEMA that could not be tested without codegen, namely, the use of the first private logic and mappable expressions support.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, arpith-jacob, kkwli0, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22691
llvm-svn: 276977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'is_device_ptr' of target
http://reviews.llvm.org/D22070
llvm-svn: 275282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'target data'
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21904
This patch is similar to the implementation of 'private' clause: it adds a list of private pointers to be used within the target data region to store the device pointers returned by the runtime.
Please refer to the following document for a full description of what the runtime witll return in this case (page 10 and 11):
https://github.com/clang-omp/OffloadingDesign
I am happy to answer any question related to the runtime interface to help reviewing this patch.
llvm-svn: 275271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The patch contains the parsing and sema support for the `from` clause.
Patch based on the original post by Kelvin Li.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18488
llvm-svn: 270882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The patch contains the parsing and sema support for the `to` clause.
Patch based on the original post by Kelvin Li.
Reviewers: carlo.bertolli, hfinkel, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18597
llvm-svn: 270880
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 270693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OpenMP 4.5 adds support for doacross loop synchronization. Patch
implements codegen for this construct.
llvm-svn: 270690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch adds logic to save the components of mappable expressions in the clause that uses it, so that they don't have to be recomputed during codegen. Given that the mappable components are (will be) used in several clauses a new geneneric implementation `OMPMappableExprListClause` is used that extends the existing `OMPVarListClause`.
This patch does not add new tests. The goal is to preserve the existing functionality while storing more info in the clauses.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, arpith-jacob, kkwli0, ABataev
Subscribers: cfe-commits, caomhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19382
llvm-svn: 267560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OpenMP 4.0 defines clause 'uniform' in 'declare simd' directive:
'uniform' '(' <argument-list> ')'
The uniform clause declares one or more arguments to have an invariant value for all concurrent invocations of the function in the execution of a single SIMD loop.
The special this pointer can be used as if was one of the arguments to the function in any of the linear, aligned, or uniform clauses.
llvm-svn: 266041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OpenMP 4.5 allows to use data members in private clauses. Patch adds
codegen support for 'linear' clause.
llvm-svn: 263002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OpenMP 4.5 allows to privatize non-static data members of current class
in non-static member functions. Patch supports codegen for non-static
data members in 'reduction' clauses.
llvm-svn: 262460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OpenMP 4.5 allows to privatize non-static member decls in non-static
member functions. Patch captures such decls by reference in general (for
bitfields, by value) and then operates with this capture. For bitfields,
at the end of codegen for lastprivates original bitfield is updated with the value of captured copy.
llvm-svn: 261824
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added codegen for captured data members in non-static member functions.
llvm-svn: 261089
|