| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for the cc1 invocation
With this patch, the clang tool will now call the -cc1 invocation directly inside the same process. Previously, the -cc1 invocation was creating, and waiting for, a new process.
This patch therefore reduces the number of created processes during a build, thus it reduces build times on platforms where process creation can be costly (Windows) and/or impacted by a antivirus.
It also makes debugging a bit easier, as there's no need to attach to the secondary -cc1 process anymore, breakpoints will be hit inside the same process.
Crashes or signaling inside the -cc1 invocation will have the same side-effect as before, and will be reported through the same means.
This behavior can be controlled at compile-time through the CLANG_SPAWN_CC1 cmake flag, which defaults to OFF. Setting it to ON will revert to the previous behavior, where any -cc1 invocation will create/fork a secondary process.
At run-time, it is also possible to tweak the CLANG_SPAWN_CC1 environment variable. Setting it and will override the compile-time setting. A value of 0 calls -cc1 inside the calling process; a value of 1 will create a secondary process, as before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69825
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes static analyzer warning that const_cast was being used despite only const methods being called.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
which is the default TLS model for non-PIC objects. This allows large/
many thread local variables or a compact/fast code in an executable.
Specification is same as that of GCC. For example, the code model
option precedes the TLS size option.
TLS access models other than local-exec are not changed. It means
supoort of the large code model is only in the local exec TLS model.
Patch By KAWASHIMA Takahiro (kawashima-fj <t-kawashima@fujitsu.com>)
Reviewers: dmgreen, mstorsjo, t.p.northover, peter.smith, ostannard
Reviewd By: peter.smith
Committed by: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71688
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
patch"
This reverts commit 4c48ea68e491cb42f1b5d43ffba89f6a7f0dadc4.
The powerpc buildbots had an internal compiler error after this patch.
This requires some inspection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The analysis for const-ness of local variables required a view generally useful
matchers that are extracted into its own patch.
They are `decompositionDecl` and `forEachArgumentWithParamType`, that works
for calls through function pointers as well.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72505
|
|
|
|
| |
-> Flag)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All 130+ f_Group flags that take an argument allow it after a '=',
except for fdebug-complation-dir. Add a Joined<> alias so that
it behaves consistently with all the other f_Group flags.
(Keep the old Separate flag for backwards compat.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Accepts child matchers cxxThisExpr to match on capture of this and also on varDecl.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the backend, this feature is implemented with the function attribute
"patchable-function-entry". Both the attribute and XRay use
TargetOpcode::PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTER, so the two features are
incompatible.
Reviewed By: ostannard, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This feature is generic. Make it applicable for AArch64 and X86 because
the backend has only implemented NOP insertion for AArch64 and X86.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This checker verifies if default placement new is provided with pointers
to sufficient storage capacity.
Noncompliant Code Example:
#include <new>
void f() {
short s;
long *lp = ::new (&s) long;
}
Based on SEI CERT rule MEM54-CPP
https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/cplusplus/MEM54-CPP.+Provide+placement+new+with+properly+aligned+pointe
This patch does not implement checking of the alignment.
Reviewers: NoQ, xazax.hun
Subscribers: mgorny, whisperity, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet,
rnkovacs, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, donat
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Avoid using the `nocf_check` attribute with Control Flow Guard. Instead, use a
new `"guard_nocf"` function attribute to indicate that checks should not be
added on indirect calls within that function. Add support for
`__declspec(guard(nocf))` following the same syntax as MSVC.
Reviewers: rnk, dmajor, pcc, hans, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, tomrittervg, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
A copy-paste error in `arm_mve.td` meant that the MVE `vqrshrun`
intrinsic family was generating the `vqshrun` machine instruction,
because in the IR intrinsic call, the rounding flag argument was set
to 0 rather than 1.
Reviewers: dmgreen, MarkMurrayARM, miyuki, ostannard
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a system header provides an (inline) implementation of some of their
function, clang still matches on the function name and generate the appropriate
llvm builtin, e.g. memcpy. This behavior is in line with glibc recommendation «
users may not provide their own version of symbols » but doesn't account for the
fact that glibc itself can provide inline version of some functions.
It is the case for the memcpy function when -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 is on. In that
case an inline version of memcpy calls __memcpy_chk, a function that performs
extra runtime checks. Clang currently ignores the inline version and thus
provides no runtime check.
This code fixes the issue by detecting functions whose name is a builtin name
but also have an inline implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71082
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The language wording change forgot to update overload resolution to rank
implicit conversion sequences based on qualification conversions in
reference bindings. The anticipated resolution for that oversight is
implemented here -- we order candidates based on qualification
conversion, not only on top-level cv-qualifiers, including ranking
reference bindings against non-reference bindings if they differ in
non-top-level qualification conversions.
For OpenCL/C++, this allows reference binding between pointers with
differing (nested) address spaces. This makes the behavior of reference
binding consistent with that of implicit pointer conversions, as is the
purpose of this change, but that pre-existing behavior for pointer
conversions is itself probably not correct. In any case, it's now
consistently the same behavior and implemented in only one place.
This reinstates commit de21704ba96fa80d3e9402f12c6505917a3885f4,
reverted in commit d8018233d1ea4234de68d5b4593abd773db79484, with
workarounds for some overload resolution ordering problems introduced by
CWG2352.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
explicit functions that are not candidates.
It's not always obvious that the reason a conversion was not possible is
because the function you wanted to call is 'explicit', so explicitly say
if that's the case.
It would be nice to rank the explicit candidates higher in the
diagnostic if an implicit conversion sequence exists for their
arguments, but unfortunately we can't determine that without potentially
triggering non-immediate-context errors that we're not permitted to
produce.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change introduces three new builtins (which work on both pointers
and integers) that can be used instead of common bitwise arithmetic:
__builtin_align_up(x, alignment), __builtin_align_down(x, alignment) and
__builtin_is_aligned(x, alignment).
I originally added these builtins to the CHERI fork of LLVM a few years ago
to handle the slightly different C semantics that we use for CHERI [1].
Until recently these builtins (or sequences of other builtins) were
required to generate correct code. I have since made changes to the default
C semantics so that they are no longer strictly necessary (but using them
does generate slightly more efficient code). However, based on our experience
using them in various projects over the past few years, I believe that adding
these builtins to clang would be useful.
These builtins have the following benefit over bit-manipulation and casts
via uintptr_t:
- The named builtins clearly convey the semantics of the operation. While
checking alignment using __builtin_is_aligned(x, 16) versus
((x & 15) == 0) is probably not a huge win in readably, I personally find
__builtin_align_up(x, N) a lot easier to read than (x+(N-1))&~(N-1).
- They preserve the type of the argument (including const qualifiers). When
using casts via uintptr_t, it is easy to cast to the wrong type or strip
qualifiers such as const.
- If the alignment argument is a constant value, clang can check that it is
a power-of-two and within the range of the type. Since the semantics of
these builtins is well defined compared to arbitrary bit-manipulation,
it is possible to add a UBSAN checker that the run-time value is a valid
power-of-two. I intend to add this as a follow-up to this change.
- The builtins avoids int-to-pointer casts both in C and LLVM IR.
In the future (i.e. once most optimizations handle it), we could use the new
llvm.ptrmask intrinsic to avoid the ptrtoint instruction that would normally
be generated.
- They can be used to round up/down to the next aligned value for both
integers and pointers without requiring two separate macros.
- In many projects the alignment operations are already wrapped in macros (e.g.
roundup2 and rounddown2 in FreeBSD), so by replacing the macro implementation
with a builtin call, we get improved diagnostics for many call-sites while
only having to change a few lines.
- Finally, the builtins also emit assume_aligned metadata when used on pointers.
This can improve code generation compared to the uintptr_t casts.
[1] In our CHERI compiler we have compilation mode where all pointers are
implemented as capabilities (essentially unforgeable 128-bit fat pointers).
In our original model, casts from uintptr_t (which is a 128-bit capability)
to an integer value returned the "offset" of the capability (i.e. the
difference between the virtual address and the base of the allocation).
This causes problems for cases such as checking the alignment: for example, the
expression `if ((uintptr_t)ptr & 63) == 0` is generally used to check if the
pointer is aligned to a multiple of 64 bytes. The problem with offsets is that
any pointer to the beginning of an allocation will have an offset of zero, so
this check always succeeds in that case (even if the address is not correctly
aligned). The same issues also exist when aligning up or down. Using the
alignment builtins ensures that the address is used instead of the offset. While
I have since changed the default C semantics to return the address instead of
the offset when casting, this offset compilation mode can still be used by
passing a command-line flag.
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, theraven, fhahn, lebedev.ri, nlopes, aqjune
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Lower to the memcpy intrinsic
- Raise warnings when size/bounds are known
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In common with most MVE immediate shift instructions, the left shift
takes an immediate in the range [0,n-1], while the right shift takes
one in the range [1,n]. I had absent-mindedly made them both the
latter.
While I'm here, I've added a set of regression tests checking both
ends of the immediate range for a representative sample of the
immediate shifts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Function trailing requires clauses now parsed, supported in overload resolution and when calling, referencing and taking the address of functions or function templates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43357
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This matcher matches any node and at the same time executes all its
inner matchers to produce any possbile result bindings.
This is useful when a user wants certain supplementary information
that's not always present along with the main match result.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This batch of intrinsics fills in all the shift instructions that take
a variable shift distance in a register, instead of an immediate. Some
of these instructions take a single shift distance in a scalar
register and apply it to all lanes; others take a vector of per-lane
distances.
These instructions are all basically one family, varying in whether
they saturate out-of-range values, and whether they round when bits
are shifted off the bottom. I've implemented them at the IR level by a
much smaller family of IR intrinsics, which take flag parameters to
indicate saturating and/or rounding (along with the usual one to
specify signed/unsigned integers).
An oddity is that all of them are //left// shift instructions – but if
you pass a negative shift count, they'll shift right. So the vector
shift distances are always vectors of //signed// integers, regardless
of whether you're considering the other input vector to be of signed
or unsigned. Also, even the simplest `vshlq` instruction in this
family (neither saturating nor rounding) has to be implemented as an
IR intrinsic, because the ordinary LLVM IR `shl` operation would
consider an out-of-range shift count to be undefined behavior.
Reviewers: dmgreen, MarkMurrayARM, miyuki, ostannard
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This batch of intrinsics covers two sets of immediate shift
instructions, which have in common that they only overwrite part of
their output register and so they need an extra input giving its
previous value.
The VSLI and VSRI instructions shift each lane of the input vector
left or right just as if they were normal immediate VSHL/VSHR, but
then they only overwrite the output bits that correspond to actual
shifted bits of the input. So VSLI will leave the low n bits of each
output lane unchanged, and VSRI the same with the top n bits.
The V[Q][R]SHR[U]N family are all narrowing shifts: they take an input
vector of 2n-bit integers, shift each lane right by a constant, and
then narrowing the shifted result to only n bits. So they only
overwrite half of the n-bit lanes in the output register, and the B/T
suffix indicates whether it's the bottom or top half of each 2n-bit
lane.
I've implemented the whole of the latter family using a single IR
intrinsic `vshrn`, which takes a lot of i32 parameters indicating
which instruction it expands to (by specifying signedness of the input
and output types, whether it saturates and/or rounds, etc).
Reviewers: dmgreen, MarkMurrayARM, miyuki, ostannard
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
An empty string literal in an asm label does not make a whole lot of sense. GCC
does not diagnose such a construct, but it also generates code that cannot be
assembled by gas should two symbols have an empty asm label within the same TU.
This does not affect an asm statement with an empty string literal, which is
still a useful construct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and multiple types in a typedef
Summary:
It now handles `typedef`s that include comma-separated multiple types, and handles embedded struct definitions, which previously could not be automatically converted.
For example, with this patch `modernize-use-using` now can convert:
typedef struct { int a; } R_t, *R_p;
to:
using R_t = struct { int a; };
using R_p = R_t*;
`-ast-dump` showed that the `CXXRecordDecl` definitions and multiple `TypedefDecl`s come consecutively in the tree, so `check()` stores information between calls to determine when it is receiving a second or additional `TypedefDecl` within a single `typedef`, or when the current `TypedefDecl` refers to an embedded `CXXRecordDecl` like a `struct`.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Patch by: poelmanc
Subscribers: riccibruno, sammccall, cfe-commits, aaron.ballman
Tags: clang-tools-extra, clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If standalone OpenMP declaration pragma, like declare mapper or declare
reduction, is declared in the class context, it may reference a member
(data or function) in its internal expressions/statements. So, the
parsing of such pragmas must be dalayed just like the parsing of the
member initializers/definitions before the completion of the class
declaration.
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
annotations
It turns out it is useful to be able to define the deref type as void.
In case we have a type erased owner, we want to express that the pointee
can be basically any type. It should not be unnatural to have a void
deref type as we already familiar with "pointers to void".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72097
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add this option to change the default launch bounds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This is a clean up for https://reviews.llvm.org/D72247.
Reviewers: MaskRay, craig.topper, jhenderson
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Subscribers: hiraditya, rupprecht, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
pack expansion.
Previously, if all parameter / argument pairs for a pack expansion
deduction were non-deduced contexts, we would not deduce the arity of
the pack, and could end up deducing a different arity (leading to
failures during substitution) or defaulting to an arity of 0 (leading to
bad diagnostics about passing the wrong number of arguments to a
variadic function). Instead, we now always deduce the arity for all
involved packs any time we deduce a pack expansion.
This will result in less substitution happening in some cases, which
could avoid non-SFINAEable errors, and should generally improve the
quality of diagnostics when passing initializer lists to variadic
functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes the range loop warnings part of -Wall.
Fixes PR32823: Warn about accidental coping of data in range based for
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68912
Recomitted after fixing the warnings it created.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Running an end-to-end test last week I noticed that a lot of the ACLE
intrinsics that operate differently on vectors of signed and unsigned
integers were ending up generating the signed version of the
instruction unconditionally. This is because the IR intrinsics had no
way to distinguish signed from unsigned: the LLVM type system just
calls them both `v8i16` (or whatever), so you need either separate
intrinsics for signed and unsigned, or a flag parameter that tells
ISel which one to choose.
This patch fixes all the problems of that kind that I've noticed, by
adding an i32 flag parameter to many of the IR intrinsics which is set
to 1 for unsigned (matching the existing practice in cases where we
got it right), and conditioning all the isel patterns on that flag. So
the fundamental change is in `IntrinsicsARM.td`, changing the
low-level IR intrinsics API; there are knock-on changes in
`arm_mve.td` (adjusting code gen for the ACLE intrinsics to use the
modified API) and in `ARMInstrMVE.td` (adjusting isel to expect the
new unsigned flags). The rest of this patch is boringly updating tests.
Reviewers: dmgreen, miyuki, MarkMurrayARM
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The ACLE intrinsics with `gather_base` or `scatter_base` in the name
are wrappers on the MVE load/store instructions that take a vector of
base addresses and an immediate offset. The immediate offset can be up
to 127 times the alignment unit, and it can be positive or negative.
At the MC layer, we got that right. But in the Sema error checking for
the wrapping intrinsics, the offset was erroneously constrained to be
positive.
To fix this I've adjusted the `imm_mem7bit` class in the Tablegen that
defines the intrinsics. But that causes integer literals like
`0xfffffffffffffe04` to appear in the autogenerated calls to
`SemaBuiltinConstantArgRange`, which provokes a compiler warning
because that's out of the non-overflowing range of an `int64_t`. So
I've also tweaked `MveEmitter` to emit that as `-0x1fc` instead.
Updated the tests of the Sema checks themselves, and also adjusted a
random sample of the CodeGen tests to actually use negative offsets
and prove they get all the way through code generation without causing
a crash.
Reviewers: dmgreen, miyuki, MarkMurrayARM
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72268
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-mpacked-stack is currently not supported with -mbackchain, so this should
result in a compilation error message instead of being silently ignored.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The OpenMP specification disallows having zero-length array
sections in the depend clause (OpenMP 5.0 2.17.11).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adds a new ASTMatcher condition called 'hasInitStatement()' that matches if,
switch and range-for statements with an initializer. Reworked clang-tidy
readability-else-after-return to handle variables in the if condition or init
statements in c++17 ifs. Also checks if removing the else would affect object
lifetimes in the else branch.
Fixes PR44364.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot failed to build lld with -Werror.
This reverts commit d8117542ac57f6051674ca70ea14c0e0d7d9b046.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes the range loop warnings part of -Wall.
Fixes PR32823: Warn about accidental coping of data in range based for
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68912
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
These overloads make it possible to wrap unless(), anyOf(), has() etc
with the traverse matcher.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71977
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows implementation of the traverse() matcher to surround
matchers like unless().
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit de21704ba96fa80d3e9402f12c6505917a3885f4.
Regressed/causes this to error due to ambiguity:
void f(const int * const &);
void f(int *);
int main() {
int * x;
f(x);
}
(in case it's important - the original case where this turned up was a
member function overload in a class template with, essentially:
f(const T1&)
f(T2*)
(where T1 == X const *, T2 == X))
It's not super clear to me if this ^ is expected behavior, in which case
I'm sorry about the revert & happy to look into ways to fix the original
code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71842
|