| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 43101
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
we currently turn:
c = @encode(char *)[2] + 4;
into:
c = "foo"[2] + 4;
Right now the foo string is hard coded, but you can imagine a world
where it wouldn't be :)
llvm-svn: 43093
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
@selector probably gets this wrong also.
llvm-svn: 43048
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rename SourceRange::Begin()/End() to getBegin()/getEnd() for
consistency with other code.
Start building the rewriter towards handling @encode.
llvm-svn: 43047
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
#import to #include's as a test.
llvm-svn: 43041
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
$ clang rewrite.c -rewrite-test
prints:
int foo() {
b: foo();
f: foo();
foo();
}
for:
int foo() {
b: foo();
f: foo();
foo();
}
amazing.
llvm-svn: 42944
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
some incredibly subtle details that I'm working on getting
right.
llvm-svn: 42940
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with x's for now. The APIs are all unimplemented, so it doesn't do
anything yet! :)
llvm-svn: 42868
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 42855
|
