| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | [clang-tidy] google-explicit-constructor: don't match in template instantiations | Alexander Kornienko | 2014-11-30 | 1 | -1/+2 |
| | | | | | | | | This helps avoiding false positives related to the recently added std::initializer_list<> handling. llvm-svn: 222981 | ||||
| * | [clang-tidy] Support initializer_list in google-explicit-constructor check | Alexander Kornienko | 2014-11-27 | 1 | -6/+34 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: According to the Google C++ Style Guide, constructors taking a single std::initializer_list<> should not be marked explicit. This change also changes the messages according to conventions used in Clang diagnostics: no capitalization of the first letter, no trailing dot. Reviewers: djasper Reviewed By: djasper Subscribers: curdeius, cfe-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6427 llvm-svn: 222878 | ||||
| * | Move google-explicit-constructor check to a separate source file. | Alexander Kornienko | 2014-06-18 | 1 | -0/+85 |
| Summary: No functional changes. Reviewers: djasper Reviewed By: djasper Subscribers: cfe-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4188 llvm-svn: 211154 | |||||

