| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
simd-based directives.
According to OpenMP 5.0 standard, ordered simd, atomic and simd
directives are allowed as nested directives in the simd-based
directives.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes cppcheck warning.
|
|
|
|
| |
We no longer emit this section if it's empty.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constexpr.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This revision introduces a new interface `MatchComputation` which generalizes
the `Stencil` interface and replaces the `std::function` interface of
`MatchConsumer`. With this revision, `Stencil` (as an abstraction) becomes just
one collection of implementations of
`MatchComputation<std::string>`. Correspondingly, we remove the `Stencil` class
entirely in favor of a simple type alias, deprecate `MatchConsumer` and change
all functions that accepted `MatchConsumer<std::string>` to use
`MatchComputation<std::string>` instead.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Bionic was modified to have all function names consistent. Modify the code and get rid of the special case for bionic since it's no longer needed.
Reviewers: cryptoad
Reviewed By: cryptoad
Subscribers: srhines, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Simple change to call target hook analyzeLoopForPipelining before
changing the loop. After peeling analyzing the loop may be more
complicated for target that don't have a loop instruction. This doesn't
affect Hexagone and PPC as they have hardware loop instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69912
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
use of the wrong prefix.
Spotted by Craig Topper in reviewing D69275.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For example:
long long test(long long a, long long b) {
if (a << b > 0)
return b;
if (a << b < 0)
return a;
return a*b;
}
Produces:
sld. 5, 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_2
mr 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_2: # %if.end
cmpldi 5, 0
li 5, 1
isel 4, 4, 5, 2
mulld 3, 4, 3
blr
But the compare (cmpldi 5, 0) is redundant and can be removed (CR0 already
contains the result of that comparison).
The root cause of this is that LLVM converts signed comparisons into equality
comparison based on dominance. Equality comparisons are unsigned by default, so
we get either a record-form or cmp (without the l for logical) feeding a cmpl.
That is the situation we want to avoid here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60506
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Sayonara SVN!
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewers: tstellar, jyknight, lebedev.ri, smeenai, mgorny, hans, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mgorny, hans
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #libc, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also add a comment that test is not automatically run, and how to run it.
Patch by Philipp Stephani!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
gcc-9 started warning when a class defined a copy constructor without a
copy assignment operator (or vice-versa).
This fixes those warnings by deleting the other special member too
(after verifying it doesn't do anything non-trivial).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
cert-pos44-c
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
alias cert-pos44-c"
This reverts commit 4edf0cb0e03e31d468979d0d7dec08bd9f4f8204.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The tail-call-kind-ness is known by the ObjCARC analysis and can be
enforced while lowering the intrinsics to calls.
This allows us to get the requested tail calls at -O0 without trying to
preserve the attributes throughout passes that change code even at -O0
,like the Always Inliner, where the ObjCOpt pass doesn't run.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The mock server pretends the process stopped with signal 17, which is
SIGCHLD on linux. This causes lldb to resume to process, utterly
confusing the test. Lldb probably shouldn't resume in this case, but for
now this issue can be fixed by changing the signal number to 2, which is
SIGINT just about anywhere.
|
|
|
|
| |
cert-pos44-c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Overflow version of XO-Form instruction uses the SO, OV and
OV32 special registers.
This changes modifies existing multiclasses and instruction
definitions to allow for the use of the XER register to record
the various types if overflow from possible add, subtract and
multiply instructions. It then modifies the existing instructions
as to use these multiclasses as needed.
Patch By: Kamau Bridgeman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/176
Patch by liu hui!
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
TypeScript now supports declaring fields:
class Foo {
declare field: string;
}
clang-format happens to already format this fine, so this change just
adds a regression test.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
JavaScript / TypeScript is adding two new operators: the null
propagating operator `?.` and the nullish coalescing operator `??`.
const x = foo ?? 'default';
const z = foo?.bar?.baz;
This change adds support to lex and format both.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We effectively never want to export that function, which is an
implementation detail of libc++. This was previously tried in
603715c66b6b and then reverted in 8335dd314f36 because it caused
linker warnings. These linker warnings should go away now that we
use internal_linkage instead of always_inline to implement per-TU
insulation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(4) (Baseline tests)
Summary: Baseline tests before applying D70042
Reviewers: spatel, asl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
has uses (PR43723) (3rd try)"
This reverts commit 3db8a3ef86e7b3331ab466a78c10a62be9e69829.
This caused a different memory-sanitizer failure than earlier attempts,
but it's still not right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(PR43723) (3rd try)
Re-try because earlier attempts were reverted due to use-after-free.
Hopefully, diagnosed correctly this time - we replace/remove the
invariant.start first rather than the invariant.end to avoid angering
worklist-based iteration.
We gather a set of white-listed instructions in isAllocSiteRemovable() and then
replace/erase them. But we don't know in general if the instructions in the set
have uses amongst themselves, so order of deletion makes a difference.
There's already a special-case for the llvm.objectsize intrinsic, so add another
for llvm.invariant.start.
Should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43723
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69977
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
trivially deletable instructions in the Reassociate Expression pass."
This reverts commit 1984a27db58e9053371ab6d6dc288c81c8a071ac.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
deletable instructions in the Reassociate Expression pass.
Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69943
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
We use the name from the IdentifierInfo of the Macro to compute its
SymbolID. It is better to just take the Name as a parameter to avoid
storing the IdentifierInfo whenever we need the SymbolID for the Macro.
Patch by UTKARSH SAXENA!
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69937
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
SimplifySelectsFeedingBinaryOp simplified binary ops when both operands
were selects with the same condition. This patch extends it to handle
these cases where only one operand is a select:
X op (C ? P : Q) -> C ? (X op P) : (X op Q)
// if X op P and X op Q both simplify
(C ? P : Q) op Y -> C ? (P op Y) : (Q op Y)
// if P op Y and Q op Y both simplify
For example: X *fast (C ? 1.0 : 0.0) -> C ? X : 0.0
Reviewers: mcberg2017, majnemer, craig.topper, qcolombet, mcrosier
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64713
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This started passing target-features on the linker line, not just for RISCV but
for all targets, leading to error messages in Chromium Android build:
'+soft-float-abi' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
'+soft-float-abi' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
See Phabricator review for details.
Reverting until this can be fixed properly.
> Summary:
> 1. enable LTO need to pass target feature and abi to LTO code generation
> RISCV backend need the target feature to decide which extension used in
> code generation.
> 2. move getTargetFeatures to CommonArgs.h and add ForLTOPlugin flag
> 3. add general tools::getTargetABI in CommonArgs.h because different target uses different
> way to get the target ABI.
>
> Patch by Kuan Hsu Chen (khchen)
>
> Reviewers: lenary, lewis-revill, asb, MaskRay
>
> Reviewed By: lenary
>
> Subscribers: hiraditya, dschuff, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, mehdi_amini, inglorion, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, steven_wu, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, dexonsmith, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits
>
> Tags: #clang
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67409
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
declarations.
Summary:
There is a regression from https://reviews.llvm.org/D68467. Unlike class
forward declarations, function ducomentation is written in the declaration in
headers, the function definition doesn't contain any documentation, cases like:
```
foo.h
// this is foo.
void foo();
foo.cc
void foo() {}
```
we should still show documentation from the foo declaration.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69961
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Additional filtering of undesired shifts for targets that do not support them efficiently.
Related with D69116 and D69120
Applies the TLI.getShiftAmountThreshold hook to prevent undesired generation of shifts for the following IR code:
```
define i16 @testShiftBits(i16 %a) {
entry:
%and = and i16 %a, -64
%cmp = icmp eq i16 %and, 64
%conv = zext i1 %cmp to i16
ret i16 %conv
}
define i16 @testShiftBits_11(i16 %a) {
entry:
%cmp = icmp ugt i16 %a, 63
%conv = zext i1 %cmp to i16
ret i16 %conv
}
define i16 @testShiftBits_12(i16 %a) {
entry:
%cmp = icmp ult i16 %a, 64
%conv = zext i1 %cmp to i16
ret i16 %conv
}
```
The attached diff file shows the piece code in TargetLowering that is responsible for the generation of shifts in relation to the IR above.
Before applying this patch, shifts will be generated to replace non-legal icmp immediates. However, shifts may be undesired if they are even more expensive for the target.
For all my previous patches in this series (cited above) I added test cases for the MSP430 target. However, in this case, the target is not suitable for showing improvements related with this patch, because the MSP430 does not implement "isLegalICmpImmediate". The default implementation returns always true, therefore the patched code in TargetLowering is never reached for that target. Targets implementing both "isLegalICmpImmediate" and "getShiftAmountThreshold" will benefit from this.
The differential effect of this patch can only be shown for the MSP430 by temporarily implementing "isLegalICmpImmediate" to return false for large immediates. This is simulated with the implementation of a command line flag that was incorporated in D69975
This patch belongs to a initiative to "relax" the generation of shifts by LLVM for targets requiring it
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, asl
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: lenary, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69326
|
|
|
|
| |
BB: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-armv7-linux-build-cache/builds/22133/steps/build%20stage%201/logs/stdio
|
| |
|