| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Select 32 and 64 bit float constants for MIPS32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59933
llvm-svn: 357183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Enough to build the clangd binaries, but this is still missing build
files for:
- fuzzer
- indexer
- index/dex/dexp
- benchmarks
- xpc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59899
llvm-svn: 357182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some tests #include <iostream> but they don't use anything from the
header. Those are probably artifacts of when the tests were developped.
llvm-svn: 357181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The current git-svnrevert script only works with git-svn repos (e.g. using "git svn find-rev" to find the commit to revert). This adds a similar implementation that works with the llvm git command handler.
Usage:
```
// Revert by svn id
$ git llvm revert r123456
// See what commands would be run instead of actually reverting
$ git llvm revert -n r123456
<full git revert + git commit commands>
// Git commit hash also fine
$ git llvm revert abc123456
// For convenience, the git->svn method can be used directly:
$ git llvm svn-lookup abc123456
r123456
// Push revert upstream (drop the -n when ready)
$ git llvm push -n
```
Regardless of how the command is invoked (with a svn revision or git hash), the message is:
```
Revert [LibFoo] Change Foo implementation
This reverts r123456 (git commit abc123)
```
Reviewers: jyknight, mehdi_amini, jlebar
Reviewed By: jlebar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59837
llvm-svn: 357180
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 357179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As noted in D59818:
%z = zext i8 %x to i32
%neg = sub i32 0, %z
%r = sext i32 %neg to i64
=>
%z2 = zext i8 %x to i64
%r = sub i64 0, %z2
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/KzSR
llvm-svn: 357178
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 357177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ensure Code Object V2 documentation is complete, but always contains a
warning and a link to the equivalent Code Object V3 documentation.
Explicitly indicate that any note records present in a code object that
are not documented must be considered deprecated and ignored.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59782
llvm-svn: 357176
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 357175
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59251
llvm-svn: 357174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
(Changes to UTF-8/UTF-16 here are NFC, moving things around to make the
cases more symmetrical)
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59927
llvm-svn: 357173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is probably the least important of our movmsk problems, but I'm starting
at the bottom to reduce distractions.
We were creating a select_cc which bypasses the select and bitmask codegen
optimizations that we have now. If we produce a compare+negate instead, we
allow things like neg/sbb carry bit hacks, and in all cases we avoid a cmov.
There's no partial register update danger in these sequences because we always
produce the zero-register xor ahead of the 'set' if needed.
There seems to be a missing fold for sext of a bool bit here:
negl %ecx
movslq %ecx, %rax
...but that's an independent transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59818
llvm-svn: 357172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This adds a BranchFusion feature to replace the usage of the MacroFusion
for AMD CPUs.
See D59688 for context.
Reviewers: andreadb, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59872
llvm-svn: 357171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also improve the check for SALU instructions to also ignore
implicit_def and other fake instructions.
llvm-svn: 357170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Based on llvm-exegesis measurements.
Now that llvm-exegesis is ~2 magnitudes faster, and is a bit smarter,
it is now possible to continue cleanup of the scheduler model.
With this, there are no more latency inconsistencies for the
opcodes that produce stable measurements, and only a few inconsistencies
for unstable measurements (MMX_* opcodes, opcodes that llvm-exegesis
measures by chaining - CMP, TEST, BT, SETcc, CVT, MOV, etc.)
llvm-svn: 357169
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To avoid more spurious clang-format changes when adding features (D59872).
llvm-svn: 357168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since rL335814, if the constraint manager cannot find a range set for `A - B`
(where `A` and `B` are symbols) it looks for a range for `B - A` and returns
it negated if it exists. However, if a range set for both `A - B` and `B - A`
is stored then it only returns the first one. If we both use `A - B` and
`B - A`, these expressions behave as two totally unrelated symbols. This way
we miss some useful deductions which may lead to false negatives or false
positives.
This tiny patch changes this behavior: if the symbolic expression the
constraint manager is looking for is a difference `A - B`, it tries to
retrieve the range for both `A - B` and `B - A` and if both exists it returns
the intersection of range `A - B` and the negated range of `B - A`. This way
every time a checker applies new constraints to the symbolic difference or to
its negated it always affects both the original difference and its negated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55007
llvm-svn: 357167
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 357166
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Format patch
llvm-svn: 357165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: When implementing `GNU style` dumper for `.gnu.version` section, we should find symbol version name by `vs_index`.
Reviewers: jhenderson, rupprecht
Reviewed By: rupprecht
Subscribers: arphaman, rupprecht, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59545
llvm-svn: 357164
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 357163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixed bug in C++ to prevent parsing 'private' as a
valid address space qualifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59874
llvm-svn: 357162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
build_vector(truncate(x),truncate(y))
If scalar truncates are free, attempt to pre-truncate build_vectors source operands.
Only attempt to do this before legalization as we often end up with truncations/extensions during build_vector lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59654
llvm-svn: 357161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Recommit r356666 with fixes for buildbot failure, as well as handling for
--emit-relocs, which we decide not to emit any relocation sections as the
table is already position independent and an offline tool can deduce the
relocations.
Instead of creating extra Synthetic .ARM.exidx sections to account for
gaps in the table, create a single .ARM.exidx SyntheticSection that can
derive the contents of the gaps from a sorted list of the executable
InputSections. This has the benefit of moving the ARM specific code for
SyntheticSections in SHF_LINK_ORDER processing and the table merging code
into the ARM specific SyntheticSection. This also makes it easier to create
EXIDX_CANTUNWIND table entries for executable InputSections that don't
have an associated .ARM.exidx section.
Fixes pr40277
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59216
llvm-svn: 357160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should just work, since ARM mode and Thumb2 mode are at the same
level of support now and should map the same to GPR and FPR.
llvm-svn: 357159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
symbols.
yaml2obj/obj2yaml does not support the symbols with STB_GNU_UNIQUE yet.
Currently, obj2yaml fails with llvm_unreachable when met such a symbol.
I faced it when investigated the https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41196.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59875
llvm-svn: 357158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-asan-detect-invalid-pointer-sub options.
This is in preparation to a driver patch to add gcc 8's -fsanitize=pointer-compare and -fsanitize=pointer-subtract.
Disabled by default as this is still an experimental feature.
Reviewed By: morehouse, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59220
llvm-svn: 357157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this change, the VPlan native path is triggered with the directive:
#pragma clang loop vectorize(enable)
There is no need to specify the vectorize_width(N) clause.
Patch by Francesco Petrogalli <francesco.petrogalli@arm.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57598
llvm-svn: 357156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that D59484 has landed its easier to add these.
Added missing AVX512BW v32i16 equivalents while I was at it.
llvm-svn: 357155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
G_STORE for 1-bit values uses a STRBi12, which stores the whole byte.
Zero out the undefined bits before writing.
llvm-svn: 357154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
G_SELECT uses a 1-bit scalar for the condition, and is currently
implemented with a plain CMPri against 0. This means that values such as
0x1110 are interpreted as true, when instead the higher bits should be
treated as undefined and therefore ignored. Replace the CMPri with a
TSTri against 0x1, which performs an implicit AND, yielding the expected
result.
llvm-svn: 357153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is an alternative to D59539.
Let's suppose we have measured 4 different opcodes, and got: `0.5`, `1.0`, `1.5`, `2.0`.
Let's suppose we are using `-analysis-clustering-epsilon=0.5`.
By default now we will start processing the `0.5` point, find that `1.0` is it's neighbor, add them to a new cluster.
Then we will notice that `1.5` is a neighbor of `1.0` and add it to that same cluster.
Then we will notice that `2.0` is a neighbor of `1.5` and add it to that same cluster.
So all these points ended up in the same cluster.
This may or may not be a correct implementation of dbscan clustering algorithm.
But this is rather horribly broken for the reasons of comparing the clusters with the LLVM sched data.
Let's suppose all those opcodes are currently in the same sched cluster.
If i specify `-analysis-inconsistency-epsilon=0.5`, then no matter
the LLVM values this cluster will **never** match the LLVM values,
and thus this cluster will **always** be displayed as inconsistent.
The solution is obviously to split off some of these opcodes into different sched cluster.
But how do i do that? Out of 4 opcodes displayed in the inconsistency report,
which ones are the "bad ones"? Which ones are the most different from the checked-in data?
I'd need to go in to the `.yaml` and look it up manually.
The trivial solution is to, when creating clusters, don't use the full dbscan algorithm,
but instead "pick some unclustered point, pick all unclustered points that are it's neighbor,
put them all into a new cluster, repeat". And just so as it happens, we can arrive
at that algorithm by not performing the "add neighbors of a neighbor to the cluster" step.
But that won't work well once we teach analyze mode to operate in on-1D mode
(i.e. on more than a single measurement type at a time), because the clustering would
depend on the order of the measurements.
Instead, let's just create a single cluster per opcode, and put all the points of that opcode into said cluster.
And simultaneously check that every point in that cluster is a neighbor of every other point in the cluster,
and if they are not, the cluster (==opcode) is unstable.
This is //yet another// step to bring me closer to being able to continue cleanup of bdver2 sched model..
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40880 | PR40880 ]].
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, jdoerfert, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59820
llvm-svn: 357152
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 357151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In gcc, -gsplit-dwarf is handled in gcc/gcc.c as a spec
(ASM_FINAL_SPEC): objcopy --extract-dwo + objcopy --strip-dwo. In
gcc/opts.c, -gsplit_dwarf has the same semantic of a -g. Except for the
availability of the external command 'objcopy', nothing precludes the
feature working on other ELF OSes. llvm doesn't use objcopy, so it doesn't
have to exclude other OSes.
llvm-svn: 357150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Add tests for selection across basic block boundary:
* one test containing a buffer load, where part of the offset
computation is placed in the predecessor of the load
* similar test, but containing two buffer loads and shared
computations
Please note that the behaviour being tested will be updated in
a subsequent commit.
This commit was extracted from https://reviews.llvm.org/D59535.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59690
llvm-svn: 357149
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add missed include.
llvm-svn: 357148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Straightforward port of StatepointIRVerifier pass to new Pass Manager framework.
Reviewers: fedor.sergeev, reames
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59825
llvm-svn: 357147
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'static_assert( is_same<'. Much easier to read. I left two tests alone: is_same.pass.cpp, which should call 'is_same' directly, and common_type.pass.cpp, which Eric is working on. NFC intended
llvm-svn: 357146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These fixup kinds are not explicitly related to the code section. They
are there to signal how to apply the fixup.
Also, a couple of other minor wasm cleanups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59908
llvm-svn: 357145
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 357144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This message now matches the equivalent message in the ELF linker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59860
llvm-svn: 357143
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 357142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the collection lock before we iterate over the owners calling ShouldStop.
BreakpointSite::ShouldStop can do a lot of work, and might by chance hit the same breakpoint
site again on another thread. So instead of holding the site's owners lock
while iterating over them calling ShouldStop, I make a local copy of the list, drop the lock
and then iterate over the copy calling BreakpointLocation::ShouldStop.
It's actually quite difficult to make this cause problems because usually all the
action happens on the private state thread, and the lock is recursive.
I have a report where some code hit the ASAN error breakpoint, went to
compile the ASAN error gathering expression, in the course of compiling
that we went to fetch the ObjC runtime data, but the state of the program
was such that the ObjC runtime grubbing function triggered an ASAN error and
we were executing that function on another thread.
I couldn't figure out a way to reproduce that situation in a test. But this is an
NFC change anyway, it just makes the locking strategy more narrowly focused.
<rdar://problem/49074093>
llvm-svn: 357141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I found that hiding this particular actual expression doesn't help
readers understand the code. So I remove and inline that function.
llvm-svn: 357140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: The Standard says as_writable_bytes.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59882
llvm-svn: 357139
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NFCI.
llvm-svn: 357138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The issue here is that we actually allow CGSCC passes to mutate IR (and
therefore invalidate analyses) outside of the current SCC. At a minimum,
we need to support mutating parent and ancestor SCCs to support the
ArgumentPromotion pass which rewrites all calls to a function.
However, the analysis invalidation infrastructure is heavily based
around not needing to invalidate the same IR-unit at multiple levels.
With Loop passes for example, they don't invalidate other Loops. So we
need to customize how we handle CGSCC invalidation. Doing this without
gratuitously re-running analyses is even harder. I've avoided most of
these by using an out-of-band preserved set to accumulate the cross-SCC
invalidation, but it still isn't perfect in the case of re-visiting the
same SCC repeatedly *but* it coming off the worklist. Unclear how
important this use case really is, but I wanted to call it out.
Another wrinkle is that in order for this to successfully propagate to
function analyses, we have to make sure we have a proxy from the SCC to
the Function level. That requires pre-creating the necessary proxy.
The motivating test case now works cleanly and is added for
ArgumentPromotion.
Thanks for the review from Philip and Wei!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59869
llvm-svn: 357137
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 357136
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pointed out by Jason.
llvm-svn: 357135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
It's not really useful, and largely increases the footprint.
<rdar://problem/49293525>
Reviewers: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: llvm-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59896
llvm-svn: 357134
|