| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: A helper function to get argument number of a arg operand Use.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66844
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The other paremeters appear to be sufficient to determine which modules
have just been loaded and need to be removed, so stop collecting and
sending in that set explicitly.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
has uses (PR43723)"
This reverts commit ef02831f0a4e3b3ccaa45a5589e4cabecbf527ab.
Sanitizer bots fail with this change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: When using the split sp adjustment and using the frame-pointer
we were still emitting CFI CFA directives based on the sp value. The
final sp-based offset also didn't reflect the two-stage sp adjust. There
remain CFI issues that aren't related to the split sp adjustment, and
thus will be addressed in a separate patch.
Reviewers: asb, lenary, shiva0217
Reviewed By: lenary, shiva0217
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Adds tests necessary to properly show the impact of other
patches that affect the emission of CFI directives.
Reviewers: asb, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(PR43723)
We gather a set of white-listed instructions in isAllocSiteRemovable() and then
replace/erase them. But we don't know in general if the instructions in the set
have uses amongst themselves, so order of deletion makes a difference.
There's already a special-case for the llvm.objectsize intrinsic, so add another
for llvm.invariant.end.
Should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43723
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69977
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:This patch fixes the following warnings uncovered by PVS
Studio:
/home/xbolva00/LLVM/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopCacheAnalysis.cpp
353 warn V612 An unconditional 'return' within a loop.
/home/xbolva00/LLVM/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopCacheAnalysis.cpp
456 err V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it
was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '=='
operator.
Authored By:etiotto
Reviewer:Meinersbur, kbarton, bmahjour, Whitney, xbolva00
Reviewed By:xbolva00
Subscribers:hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag:LLVM
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D69821
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes PR43952
|
|
|
|
| |
Code block isn't IR - so treat it as "none" instead.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This recommits 11ed1c0239fd51fd2f064311dc7725277ed0a994 (reverted in
9f08ce0d2197d4f163dfa4633eae2347ce8fc881 for failing an assert) with a fix:
tryToWidenMemory() now first checks if the widening decision is to interleave,
thus maintaining previous behavior where tryToInterleaveMemory() was called
first, giving priority to interleave decisions over widening/scalarization. This
commit adds the test case that exposed this bug as a LIT.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: I agree with https://easyaspi314.github.io/gcc-vs-clang.html?fbclid=IwAR1VA0qxiWVUusOQUv5z7JESS7ZpeJy-UqAI5mnJscofGLqXcqeErIUB2gU, current warning message is not very good. We should try to improve it..
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, easyaspi314
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: arphaman, Quuxplusone, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69762
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 4a5aa1a7bf8b1714b817ede8e09cd28c0784228a.
There are some other test failures. Investigate them first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch introduced a new bpf specific attribute which can
be added to struct or union definition. For example,
struct s { ... } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
union u { ... } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
The goal is to simplify user codes for cases
where preserve access index happens for certain struct/union,
so user does not need to use clang __builtin_preserve_access_index
for every members.
The attribute has no effect if -g is not specified.
When the attribute is specified and -g is specified, any member
access defined by that structure or union, including array subscript
access and inner records, will be preserved through
__builtin_preserve_{array,struct,union}_access_index()
IR intrinsics, which will enable relocation generation
in bpf backend.
The following is an example to illustrate the usage:
-bash-4.4$ cat t.c
#define __reloc__ __attribute__((preserve_access_index))
struct s1 {
int c;
} __reloc__;
struct s2 {
union {
struct s1 b[3];
};
} __reloc__;
struct s3 {
struct s2 a;
} __reloc__;
int test(struct s3 *arg) {
return arg->a.b[2].c;
}
-bash-4.4$ clang -target bpf -g -S -O2 t.c
A relocation with access string "0:0:0:0:2:0" will be generated
representing access offset of arg->a.b[2].c.
forward declaration with attribute is also handled properly such
that the attribute is copied and populated in real record definition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change would have warned about the bug found in D62451.
No unit tests since the exception should never throw.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before when the overflow occured an assertion was triggered. Now check
whether the maximum has been reached and warn properly.
This patch fixes the original submission of PR19607.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63975
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Wang Tianqing!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69792
|
|
|
|
| |
Missed Stats->EnableStats rename in rG3fb832fe8bdc317687d5a4d2ca20f5f73b089341
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Fix uninitialized variable warnings.
- Reuse BitstreamEntry iterator to avoid Wshadow warning.
- Match declaration + definition arg names in BitstreamRemarkParser::processCommonMeta
- Make BitstreamRemarkParser(StringRef) constructor explicit
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Rename option 'Stats' to 'EnableStats' and prevent clash with StatisticInfo::Stats member
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Avoid conflict with llvm::remarks::Magic global variable.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|