summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPredication.cpp13
-rw-r--r--llvm/test/Transforms/LoopPredication/predicate-exits.ll81
2 files changed, 93 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPredication.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPredication.cpp
index 9abf6deebb6..9d67046d743 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPredication.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPredication.cpp
@@ -1019,6 +1019,17 @@ static const SCEV *getMinAnalyzeableBackedgeTakenCount(ScalarEvolution &SE,
return SE.getUMinFromMismatchedTypes(ExitCounts);
}
+/// Return true if we can be fairly sure that executing block BB will probably
+/// lead to executing an __llvm_deoptimize. This is a profitability heuristic,
+/// not a legality constraint.
+static bool isVeryLikelyToDeopt(BasicBlock *BB) {
+ while (BB->getUniqueSuccessor())
+ // Will skip side effects, that's okay
+ BB = BB->getUniqueSuccessor();
+
+ return BB->getTerminatingDeoptimizeCall();
+}
+
/// This implements an analogous, but entirely distinct transform from the main
/// loop predication transform. This one is phrased in terms of using a
/// widenable branch *outside* the loop to allow us to simplify loop exits in a
@@ -1109,7 +1120,7 @@ bool LoopPredication::predicateLoopExits(Loop *L, SCEVExpander &Rewriter) {
const bool ExitIfTrue = !L->contains(*succ_begin(ExitingBB));
BasicBlock *ExitBB = BI->getSuccessor(ExitIfTrue ? 0 : 1);
- if (!ExitBB->getTerminatingDeoptimizeCall())
+ if (!isVeryLikelyToDeopt(ExitBB))
// Profitability: indicator of rarely/never taken exit
continue;
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopPredication/predicate-exits.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopPredication/predicate-exits.ll
index b71ac8c3c7e..340f509fe03 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopPredication/predicate-exits.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopPredication/predicate-exits.ll
@@ -675,11 +675,92 @@ exit:
}
+;; Unswitch likes to produce some ugly exit blocks without simplifications
+;; being applied. Make sure we can handle that form.
+define i32 @unswitch_exit_form(i32* %array, i32 %length, i32 %n, i1 %cond_0) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @unswitch_exit_form(
+; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[WIDENABLE_COND:%.*]] = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = icmp ugt i32 [[N:%.*]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[UMAX:%.*]] = select i1 [[TMP0]], i32 [[N]], i32 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = add i32 [[UMAX]], -1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = icmp ult i32 [[LENGTH:%.*]], [[TMP1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[UMIN:%.*]] = select i1 [[TMP2]], i32 [[LENGTH]], i32 [[TMP1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP3:%.*]] = icmp ugt i32 [[LENGTH]], [[UMIN]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP4:%.*]] = freeze i1 [[TMP3]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP5:%.*]] = and i1 [[TMP4]], [[COND_0:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND:%.*]] = and i1 [[TMP5]], [[WIDENABLE_COND]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[EXIPLICIT_GUARD_COND]], label [[LOOP_PREHEADER:%.*]], label [[DEOPT:%.*]], !prof !0
+; CHECK: deopt.loopexit:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[DEOPT]]
+; CHECK: deopt:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHI:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ 1, [[DEOPT_LOOPEXIT:%.*]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @unknown()
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[ACTUAL_DEOPT:%.*]]
+; CHECK: actual_deopt:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[DEOPTRET:%.*]] = call i32 (...) @llvm.experimental.deoptimize.i32() [ "deopt"(i32 [[PHI]]) ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[DEOPTRET]]
+; CHECK: loop.preheader:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[LOOP:%.*]]
+; CHECK: loop:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[LOOP_ACC:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[LOOP_ACC_NEXT:%.*]], [[GUARDED:%.*]] ], [ 0, [[LOOP_PREHEADER]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[I:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[I_NEXT:%.*]], [[GUARDED]] ], [ 0, [[LOOP_PREHEADER]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @unknown()
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[WITHIN_BOUNDS:%.*]] = icmp ult i32 [[I]], [[LENGTH]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label [[GUARDED]], label [[DEOPT_LOOPEXIT]], !prof !0
+; CHECK: guarded:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[I_I64:%.*]] = zext i32 [[I]] to i64
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ARRAY_I_PTR:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* [[ARRAY:%.*]], i64 [[I_I64]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ARRAY_I:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[ARRAY_I_PTR]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 0, i32* [[ARRAY_I_PTR]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[LOOP_ACC_NEXT]] = add i32 [[LOOP_ACC]], [[ARRAY_I]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[I_NEXT]] = add nuw i32 [[I]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[CONTINUE:%.*]] = icmp ult i32 [[I_NEXT]], [[N]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CONTINUE]], label [[LOOP]], label [[EXIT:%.*]]
+; CHECK: exit:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[RESULT:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[LOOP_ACC_NEXT]], [[GUARDED]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[RESULT]]
+;
+entry:
+ %widenable_cond = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+ %exiplicit_guard_cond = and i1 %cond_0, %widenable_cond
+ br i1 %exiplicit_guard_cond, label %loop.preheader, label %deopt, !prof !0
+deopt:
+ ;; This is written to look like an unsimplified loop exit after unswitch
+ ;; (i.e. phis, merge, and branch to actual block)
+ %phi = phi i32 [0, %entry], [1, %loop]
+ call void @unknown() ;; it's okay to skip possible throws
+ br label %actual_deopt
+
+actual_deopt:
+ %deoptret = call i32 (...) @llvm.experimental.deoptimize.i32() [ "deopt"(i32 %phi) ]
+ ret i32 %deoptret
+loop.preheader:
+ br label %loop
+loop:
+ %loop.acc = phi i32 [ %loop.acc.next, %guarded ], [ 0, %loop.preheader ]
+ %i = phi i32 [ %i.next, %guarded ], [ 0, %loop.preheader ]
+ call void @unknown()
+ %within.bounds = icmp ult i32 %i, %length
+ br i1 %within.bounds, label %guarded, label %deopt, !prof !0
+guarded:
+ %i.i64 = zext i32 %i to i64
+ %array.i.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %array, i64 %i.i64
+ %array.i = load i32, i32* %array.i.ptr, align 4
+ store i32 0, i32* %array.i.ptr
+ %loop.acc.next = add i32 %loop.acc, %array.i
+ %i.next = add nuw i32 %i, 1
+ %continue = icmp ult i32 %i.next, %n
+ br i1 %continue, label %loop, label %exit
+exit:
+ %result = phi i32 [ %loop.acc.next, %guarded ]
+ ret i32 %result
+}
; TODO: Non-latch exits can still be predicated
; This is currently prevented by an overly restrictive profitability check.
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud