diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp | 28 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp index e31a47c5224..c18739254b0 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FlagsCopyLowering.cpp @@ -338,8 +338,8 @@ static MachineBasicBlock &splitBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, } bool X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) { - DEBUG(dbgs() << "********** " << getPassName() << " : " << MF.getName() - << " **********\n"); + LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "********** " << getPassName() << " : " << MF.getName() + << " **********\n"); auto &Subtarget = MF.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>(); MRI = &MF.getRegInfo(); @@ -381,8 +381,9 @@ bool X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) { // instructions. Until we have a motivating test case and fail to avoid // it by changing other parts of LLVM's lowering, we refuse to handle // this complex case here. - DEBUG(dbgs() << "ERROR: Encountered unexpected def of an eflags copy: "; - CopyDefI.dump()); + LLVM_DEBUG( + dbgs() << "ERROR: Encountered unexpected def of an eflags copy: "; + CopyDefI.dump()); report_fatal_error( "Cannot lower EFLAGS copy unless it is defined in turn by a copy!"); } @@ -406,7 +407,7 @@ bool X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) { auto TestPos = CopyDefI.getIterator(); DebugLoc TestLoc = CopyDefI.getDebugLoc(); - DEBUG(dbgs() << "Rewriting copy: "; CopyI->dump()); + LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Rewriting copy: "; CopyI->dump()); // Scan for usage of newly set EFLAGS so we can rewrite them. We just buffer // jumps because their usage is very constrained. @@ -443,7 +444,7 @@ bool X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) { // other lowering transformation could induce this to happen, we do // a hard check even in non-debug builds here. if (&TestMBB != &UseMBB && !MDT->dominates(&TestMBB, &UseMBB)) { - DEBUG({ + LLVM_DEBUG({ dbgs() << "ERROR: Encountered use that is not dominated by our test " "basic block! Rewriting this would require inserting PHI " "nodes to track the flag state across the CFG.\n\nTest " @@ -477,7 +478,7 @@ bool X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) { continue; } - DEBUG(dbgs() << " Rewriting use: "; MI.dump()); + LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Rewriting use: "; MI.dump()); // Check the kill flag before we rewrite as that may change it. if (FlagUse->isKill()) @@ -570,7 +571,8 @@ bool X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) { if (MI.getOpcode() == TargetOpcode::COPY && (MI.getOperand(0).getReg() == X86::EFLAGS || MI.getOperand(1).getReg() == X86::EFLAGS)) { - DEBUG(dbgs() << "ERROR: Found a COPY involving EFLAGS: "; MI.dump()); + LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "ERROR: Found a COPY involving EFLAGS: "; + MI.dump()); llvm_unreachable("Unlowered EFLAGS copy!"); } #endif @@ -608,7 +610,7 @@ unsigned X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::promoteCondToReg( auto SetI = BuildMI(TestMBB, TestPos, TestLoc, TII->get(X86::getSETFromCond(Cond)), Reg); (void)SetI; - DEBUG(dbgs() << " save cond: "; SetI->dump()); + LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " save cond: "; SetI->dump()); ++NumSetCCsInserted; return Reg; } @@ -633,7 +635,7 @@ void X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::insertTest(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, auto TestI = BuildMI(MBB, Pos, Loc, TII->get(X86::TEST8rr)).addReg(Reg).addReg(Reg); (void)TestI; - DEBUG(dbgs() << " test cond: "; TestI->dump()); + LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " test cond: "; TestI->dump()); ++NumTestsInserted; } @@ -685,7 +687,7 @@ void X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::rewriteArithmetic( .addReg(CondReg) .addImm(Addend); (void)AddI; - DEBUG(dbgs() << " add cond: "; AddI->dump()); + LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " add cond: "; AddI->dump()); ++NumAddsInserted; FlagUse.setIsKill(true); } @@ -715,7 +717,7 @@ void X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::rewriteCMov(MachineBasicBlock &TestMBB, Inverted ? X86::COND_E : X86::COND_NE, TRI->getRegSizeInBits(CMovRC) / 8, !CMovI.memoperands_empty()))); FlagUse.setIsKill(true); - DEBUG(dbgs() << " fixed cmov: "; CMovI.dump()); + LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " fixed cmov: "; CMovI.dump()); } void X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::rewriteCondJmp( @@ -739,7 +741,7 @@ void X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::rewriteCondJmp( X86::GetCondBranchFromCond(Inverted ? X86::COND_E : X86::COND_NE))); const int ImplicitEFLAGSOpIdx = 1; JmpI.getOperand(ImplicitEFLAGSOpIdx).setIsKill(true); - DEBUG(dbgs() << " fixed jCC: "; JmpI.dump()); + LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " fixed jCC: "; JmpI.dump()); } void X86FlagsCopyLoweringPass::rewriteCopy(MachineInstr &MI, |
