summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ResourcePriorityQueue.cpp6
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp2
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp8
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/StatepointLowering.cpp25
4 files changed, 21 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ResourcePriorityQueue.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ResourcePriorityQueue.cpp
index 6303422b9ae..622e06f0da2 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ResourcePriorityQueue.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ResourcePriorityQueue.cpp
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ ResourcePriorityQueue::ResourcePriorityQueue(SelectionDAGISel *IS)
TII = STI.getInstrInfo();
ResourcesModel.reset(TII->CreateTargetScheduleState(STI));
// This hard requirement could be relaxed, but for now
- // do not let it procede.
+ // do not let it proceed.
assert(ResourcesModel && "Unimplemented CreateTargetScheduleState.");
unsigned NumRC = TRI->getNumRegClasses();
@@ -269,12 +269,12 @@ bool ResourcePriorityQueue::isResourceAvailable(SUnit *SU) {
}
// Now see if there are no other dependencies
- // to instructions alredy in the packet.
+ // to instructions already in the packet.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Packet.size(); i != e; ++i)
for (SUnit::const_succ_iterator I = Packet[i]->Succs.begin(),
E = Packet[i]->Succs.end(); I != E; ++I) {
// Since we do not add pseudos to packets, might as well
- // ignor order deps.
+ // ignore order deps.
if (I->isCtrl())
continue;
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
index 8a382270b82..61eb4cbbfd1 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
@@ -2677,7 +2677,7 @@ unsigned SelectionDAG::ComputeNumSignBits(SDValue Op, unsigned Depth) const{
const int rIndex = Items - 1 -
cast<ConstantSDNode>(Op.getOperand(1))->getZExtValue();
- // If the sign portion ends in our element the substraction gives correct
+ // If the sign portion ends in our element the subtraction gives correct
// result. Otherwise it gives either negative or > bitwidth result
return std::max(std::min(KnownSign - rIndex * BitWidth, BitWidth), 0);
}
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
index 99a74cdb8e6..e31ba326d09 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
@@ -3069,7 +3069,7 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitStore(const StoreInst &I) {
void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitMaskedStore(const CallInst &I) {
SDLoc sdl = getCurSDLoc();
- // llvm.masked.store.*(Src0, Ptr, alignemt, Mask)
+ // llvm.masked.store.*(Src0, Ptr, alignment, Mask)
Value *PtrOperand = I.getArgOperand(1);
SDValue Ptr = getValue(PtrOperand);
SDValue Src0 = getValue(I.getArgOperand(0));
@@ -3094,13 +3094,13 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitMaskedStore(const CallInst &I) {
}
// Gather/scatter receive a vector of pointers.
-// This vector of pointers may be represented as a base pointer + vector of
-// indices, it depends on GEP and instruction preceeding GEP
+// This vector of pointers may be represented as a base pointer + vector of
+// indices, it depends on GEP and instruction preceding GEP
// that calculates indices
static bool getUniformBase(Value *& Ptr, SDValue& Base, SDValue& Index,
SelectionDAGBuilder* SDB) {
- assert (Ptr->getType()->isVectorTy() && "Uexpected pointer type");
+ assert(Ptr->getType()->isVectorTy() && "Unexpected pointer type");
GetElementPtrInst *Gep = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(Ptr);
if (!Gep || Gep->getNumOperands() > 2)
return false;
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/StatepointLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/StatepointLowering.cpp
index c62428d308e..7eb8728e1fc 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/StatepointLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/StatepointLowering.cpp
@@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ StatepointLoweringState::allocateStackSlot(EVT ValueType,
return Builder.DAG.getFrameIndex(FI, ValueType);
}
// Note: We deliberately choose to advance this only on the failing path.
- // Doing so on the suceeding path involes a bit of complexity that caused a
- // minor bug previously. Unless performance shows this matters, please
+ // Doing so on the succeeding path involves a bit of complexity that caused
+ // a minor bug previously. Unless performance shows this matters, please
// keep this code as simple as possible.
NextSlotToAllocate++;
}
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ StatepointLoweringState::allocateStackSlot(EVT ValueType,
static Optional<int> findPreviousSpillSlot(const Value *Val,
SelectionDAGBuilder &Builder,
int LookUpDepth) {
- // Can not look any futher - give up now
+ // Can not look any further - give up now
if (LookUpDepth <= 0)
return Optional<int>();
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static Optional<int> findPreviousSpillSlot(const Value *Val,
/// Try to find existing copies of the incoming values in stack slots used for
/// statepoint spilling. If we can find a spill slot for the incoming value,
/// mark that slot as allocated, and reuse the same slot for this safepoint.
-/// This helps to avoid series of loads and stores that only serve to resuffle
+/// This helps to avoid series of loads and stores that only serve to reshuffle
/// values on the stack between calls.
static void reservePreviousStackSlotForValue(const Value *IncomingValue,
SelectionDAGBuilder &Builder) {
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static void removeDuplicatesGCPtrs(SmallVectorImpl<const Value *> &Bases,
SmallVectorImpl<const Value *> &Relocs,
SelectionDAGBuilder &Builder) {
- // This is horribly ineffecient, but I don't care right now
+ // This is horribly inefficient, but I don't care right now
SmallSet<SDValue, 64> Seen;
SmallVector<const Value *, 64> NewBases, NewPtrs, NewRelocs;
@@ -347,11 +347,11 @@ lowerCallFromStatepoint(ImmutableStatepoint ISP, MachineBasicBlock *LandingPad,
if (CS.isInvoke()) {
// Result value will be used in different basic block for invokes
// so we need to export it now. But statepoint call has a different type
- // than the actuall call. It means that standart exporting mechanism will
+ // than the actual call. It means that standard exporting mechanism will
// create register of the wrong type. So instead we need to create
// register with correct type and save value into it manually.
// TODO: To eliminate this problem we can remove gc.result intrinsics
- // completelly and make statepoint call to return a tuple.
+ // completely and make statepoint call to return a tuple.
unsigned Reg = Builder.FuncInfo.CreateRegs(ISP.getActualReturnType());
RegsForValue RFV(
*Builder.DAG.getContext(), Builder.DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo(),
@@ -597,16 +597,17 @@ static void lowerStatepointMetaArgs(SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &Ops,
SpillMap[V] = cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(Loc)->getIndex();
} else {
// Record value as visited, but not spilled. This is case for allocas
- // and constants. For this values we can avoid emiting spill load while
+ // and constants. For this values we can avoid emitting spill load while
// visiting corresponding gc_relocate.
// Actually we do not need to record them in this map at all.
- // We do this only to check that we are not relocating any unvisited value.
+ // We do this only to check that we are not relocating any unvisited
+ // value.
SpillMap[V] = None;
// Default llvm mechanisms for exporting values which are used in
// different basic blocks does not work for gc relocates.
// Note that it would be incorrect to teach llvm that all relocates are
- // uses of the corresponging values so that it would automatically
+ // uses of the corresponding values so that it would automatically
// export them. Relocates of the spilled values does not use original
// value.
if (StatepointSite.getCallSite().isInvoke())
@@ -806,7 +807,7 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::LowerStatepoint(
// Replace original call
DAG.ReplaceAllUsesWith(CallNode, SinkNode); // This may update Root
- // Remove originall call node
+ // Remove original call node
DAG.DeleteNode(CallNode);
// DON'T set the root - under the assumption that it's already set past the
@@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitGCRelocate(const CallInst &CI) {
// Be conservative: flush all pending loads
// TODO: Probably we can be less restrictive on this,
- // it may allow more scheduling opprtunities
+ // it may allow more scheduling opportunities.
SDValue Chain = getRoot();
SDValue SpillLoad =
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud