1 files changed, 15 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp
index dc23c13fbb3..923da4e06b6 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp
@@ -2098,17 +2098,30 @@ bool Sema::LookupParsedName(LookupResult &R, Scope *S, CXXScopeSpec *SS,
 ///
 /// @returns True if any decls were found (but possibly ambiguous)
 bool Sema::LookupInSuper(LookupResult &R, CXXRecordDecl *Class) {
+  // The access-control rules we use here are essentially the rules for
+  // doing a lookup in Class that just magically skipped the direct
+  // members of Class itself.  That is, the naming class is Class, and the
+  // access includes the access of the base.
   for (const auto &BaseSpec : Class->bases()) {
     CXXRecordDecl *RD = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(
         BaseSpec.getType()->castAs<RecordType>()->getDecl());
     LookupResult Result(*this, R.getLookupNameInfo(), R.getLookupKind());
 	Result.setBaseObjectType(Context.getRecordType(Class));
     LookupQualifiedName(Result, RD);
-    for (auto *Decl : Result)
-      R.addDecl(Decl);
+
+    // Copy the lookup results into the target, merging the base's access into
+    // the path access.
+    for (auto I = Result.begin(), E = Result.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+      R.addDecl(I.getDecl(),
+                CXXRecordDecl::MergeAccess(BaseSpec.getAccessSpecifier(),
+                                           I.getAccess()));
+    }
+
+    Result.suppressDiagnostics();
   }
 
   R.resolveKind();
+  R.setNamingClass(Class);
 
   return !R.empty();
 }