1 files changed, 39 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
index 65bdd2a47fb..7dd17a028f6 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
@@ -3341,33 +3341,56 @@ static bool checkArithmeticOnObjCPointer(Sema &S,
 }
 
 ExprResult
-Sema::ActOnArraySubscriptExpr(Scope *S, Expr *Base, SourceLocation LLoc,
-                              Expr *Idx, SourceLocation RLoc) {
+Sema::ActOnArraySubscriptExpr(Scope *S, Expr *base, SourceLocation lbLoc,
+                              Expr *idx, SourceLocation rbLoc) {
   // Since this might be a postfix expression, get rid of ParenListExprs.
-  ExprResult Result = MaybeConvertParenListExprToParenExpr(S, Base);
-  if (Result.isInvalid()) return ExprError();
-  Base = Result.take();
+  if (isa<ParenListExpr>(base)) {
+    ExprResult result = MaybeConvertParenListExprToParenExpr(S, base);
+    if (result.isInvalid()) return ExprError();
+    base = result.take();
+  }
 
-  Expr *LHSExp = Base, *RHSExp = Idx;
+  // Handle any non-overload placeholder types in the base and index
+  // expressions.  We can't handle overloads here because the other
+  // operand might be an overloadable type, in which case the overload
+  // resolution for the operator overload should get the first crack
+  // at the overload.
+  if (base->getType()->isNonOverloadPlaceholderType()) {
+    ExprResult result = CheckPlaceholderExpr(base);
+    if (result.isInvalid()) return ExprError();
+    base = result.take();
+  }
+  if (idx->getType()->isNonOverloadPlaceholderType()) {
+    ExprResult result = CheckPlaceholderExpr(idx);
+    if (result.isInvalid()) return ExprError();
+    idx = result.take();
+  }
 
+  // Build an unanalyzed expression if either operand is type-dependent.
   if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus &&
-      (LHSExp->isTypeDependent() || RHSExp->isTypeDependent())) {
-    return Owned(new (Context) ArraySubscriptExpr(LHSExp, RHSExp,
+      (base->isTypeDependent() || idx->isTypeDependent())) {
+    return Owned(new (Context) ArraySubscriptExpr(base, idx,
                                                   Context.DependentTy,
                                                   VK_LValue, OK_Ordinary,
-                                                  RLoc));
+                                                  rbLoc));
   }
 
+  // Use C++ overloaded-operator rules if either operand has record
+  // type.  The spec says to do this if either type is *overloadable*,
+  // but enum types can't declare subscript operators or conversion
+  // operators, so there's nothing interesting for overload resolution
+  // to do if there aren't any record types involved.
+  //
+  // ObjC pointers have their own subscripting logic that is not tied
+  // to overload resolution and so should not take this path.
   if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus &&
-      (LHSExp->getType()->isRecordType() ||
-       LHSExp->getType()->isEnumeralType() ||
-       RHSExp->getType()->isRecordType() ||
-       RHSExp->getType()->isEnumeralType()) &&
-      !LHSExp->getType()->isObjCObjectPointerType()) {
-    return CreateOverloadedArraySubscriptExpr(LLoc, RLoc, Base, Idx);
+      (base->getType()->isRecordType() ||
+       (!base->getType()->isObjCObjectPointerType() &&
+        idx->getType()->isRecordType()))) {
+    return CreateOverloadedArraySubscriptExpr(lbLoc, rbLoc, base, idx);
   }
 
-  return CreateBuiltinArraySubscriptExpr(Base, LLoc, Idx, RLoc);
+  return CreateBuiltinArraySubscriptExpr(base, lbLoc, idx, rbLoc);
 }
 
 ExprResult