summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/clang/lib/CodeGen
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/CodeGen')
-rw-r--r--clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprComplex.cpp197
1 files changed, 162 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprComplex.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprComplex.cpp
index 7244b9e4d1e..02fb79ab642 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprComplex.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprComplex.cpp
@@ -230,6 +230,9 @@ public:
ComplexPairTy EmitBinMul(const BinOpInfo &Op);
ComplexPairTy EmitBinDiv(const BinOpInfo &Op);
+ ComplexPairTy EmitComplexBinOpLibCall(StringRef LibCallName,
+ const BinOpInfo &Op);
+
ComplexPairTy VisitBinAdd(const BinaryOperator *E) {
return EmitBinAdd(EmitBinOps(E));
}
@@ -528,9 +531,15 @@ ComplexPairTy ComplexExprEmitter::EmitBinAdd(const BinOpInfo &Op) {
if (Op.LHS.first->getType()->isFloatingPointTy()) {
ResR = Builder.CreateFAdd(Op.LHS.first, Op.RHS.first, "add.r");
- ResI = Builder.CreateFAdd(Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.second, "add.i");
+ if (Op.LHS.second && Op.RHS.second)
+ ResI = Builder.CreateFAdd(Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.second, "add.i");
+ else
+ ResI = Op.LHS.second ? Op.LHS.second : Op.RHS.second;
+ assert(ResI && "Only one operand may be real!");
} else {
ResR = Builder.CreateAdd(Op.LHS.first, Op.RHS.first, "add.r");
+ assert(Op.LHS.second && Op.RHS.second &&
+ "Both operands of integer complex operators must be complex!");
ResI = Builder.CreateAdd(Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.second, "add.i");
}
return ComplexPairTy(ResR, ResI);
@@ -539,63 +548,159 @@ ComplexPairTy ComplexExprEmitter::EmitBinAdd(const BinOpInfo &Op) {
ComplexPairTy ComplexExprEmitter::EmitBinSub(const BinOpInfo &Op) {
llvm::Value *ResR, *ResI;
if (Op.LHS.first->getType()->isFloatingPointTy()) {
- ResR = Builder.CreateFSub(Op.LHS.first, Op.RHS.first, "sub.r");
- ResI = Builder.CreateFSub(Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.second, "sub.i");
+ ResR = Builder.CreateFSub(Op.LHS.first, Op.RHS.first, "sub.r");
+ if (Op.LHS.second && Op.RHS.second)
+ ResI = Builder.CreateFSub(Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.second, "sub.i");
+ else
+ ResI = Op.LHS.second ? Op.LHS.second
+ : Builder.CreateFNeg(Op.RHS.second, "sub.i");
+ assert(ResI && "Only one operand may be real!");
} else {
- ResR = Builder.CreateSub(Op.LHS.first, Op.RHS.first, "sub.r");
+ ResR = Builder.CreateSub(Op.LHS.first, Op.RHS.first, "sub.r");
+ assert(Op.LHS.second && Op.RHS.second &&
+ "Both operands of integer complex operators must be complex!");
ResI = Builder.CreateSub(Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.second, "sub.i");
}
return ComplexPairTy(ResR, ResI);
}
+/// \brief Emit a libcall for a binary operation on complex types.
+ComplexPairTy ComplexExprEmitter::EmitComplexBinOpLibCall(StringRef LibCallName,
+ const BinOpInfo &Op) {
+ CallArgList Args;
+ Args.add(RValue::get(Op.LHS.first),
+ Op.Ty->castAs<ComplexType>()->getElementType());
+ Args.add(RValue::get(Op.LHS.second),
+ Op.Ty->castAs<ComplexType>()->getElementType());
+ Args.add(RValue::get(Op.RHS.first),
+ Op.Ty->castAs<ComplexType>()->getElementType());
+ Args.add(RValue::get(Op.RHS.second),
+ Op.Ty->castAs<ComplexType>()->getElementType());
+
+ // We *must* use the full CG function call building logic here because the
+ // complex type has special ABI handling.
+ const CGFunctionInfo &FuncInfo = CGF.CGM.getTypes().arrangeFreeFunctionCall(
+ Op.Ty, Args, FunctionType::ExtInfo(), RequiredArgs::All);
+ llvm::FunctionType *FTy = CGF.CGM.getTypes().GetFunctionType(FuncInfo);
+ llvm::Constant *Func = CGF.CGM.CreateRuntimeFunction(FTy, LibCallName);
+
+ llvm::Value *ArgVals[] = {Op.LHS.first, Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.first,
+ Op.RHS.second};
+ llvm::Value *Result = CGF.EmitRuntimeCall(Func, ArgVals);
+ llvm::Value *ResR, *ResI;
+ if (Result->getType()->isVectorTy()) {
+ ResR = CGF.Builder.CreateExtractElement(Result, CGF.Builder.getInt32(0));
+ ResI = CGF.Builder.CreateExtractElement(Result, CGF.Builder.getInt32(1));
+ } else {
+ assert(Result->getType()->isAggregateType() &&
+ "Only vector and aggregate libcall returns are supported!");
+ unsigned ResRIndices[] = {0};
+ ResR = CGF.Builder.CreateExtractValue(Result, ResRIndices);
+ unsigned ResIIndices[] = {1};
+ ResI = CGF.Builder.CreateExtractValue(Result, ResIIndices);
+ }
+ return ComplexPairTy(ResR, ResI);
+}
+
+// See C11 Annex G.5.1 for the semantics of multiplicative operators on complex
+// typed values.
ComplexPairTy ComplexExprEmitter::EmitBinMul(const BinOpInfo &Op) {
using llvm::Value;
Value *ResR, *ResI;
if (Op.LHS.first->getType()->isFloatingPointTy()) {
- Value *ResRl = Builder.CreateFMul(Op.LHS.first, Op.RHS.first, "mul.rl");
- Value *ResRr = Builder.CreateFMul(Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.second,"mul.rr");
- ResR = Builder.CreateFSub(ResRl, ResRr, "mul.r");
+ // The general formulation is:
+ // (a + ib) * (c + id) = (a * c - b * d) + i(a * d + b * c)
+ //
+ // But we can fold away components which would be zero due to a real
+ // operand according to C11 Annex G.5.1p2.
+ // FIXME: C11 also provides for imaginary types which would allow folding
+ // still more of this within the type system.
+
+ if (Op.LHS.second && Op.RHS.second) {
+ // If both operands are complex, delegate to a libcall which works to
+ // prevent underflow and overflow.
+ StringRef LibCallName;
+ switch (Op.LHS.first->getType()->getTypeID()) {
+ default:
+ llvm_unreachable("Unsupported floating point type!");
+ case llvm::Type::HalfTyID:
+ return EmitComplexBinOpLibCall("__mulhc3", Op);
+ case llvm::Type::FloatTyID:
+ return EmitComplexBinOpLibCall("__mulsc3", Op);
+ case llvm::Type::DoubleTyID:
+ return EmitComplexBinOpLibCall("__muldc3", Op);
+ case llvm::Type::X86_FP80TyID:
+ return EmitComplexBinOpLibCall("__mulxc3", Op);
+ }
+ }
+ assert((Op.LHS.second || Op.RHS.second) &&
+ "At least one operand must be complex!");
+
+ // If either of the operands is a real rather than a complex, the
+ // imaginary component is ignored when computing the real component of the
+ // result.
+ ResR = Builder.CreateFMul(Op.LHS.first, Op.RHS.first, "mul.rl");
- Value *ResIl = Builder.CreateFMul(Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.first, "mul.il");
- Value *ResIr = Builder.CreateFMul(Op.LHS.first, Op.RHS.second, "mul.ir");
- ResI = Builder.CreateFAdd(ResIl, ResIr, "mul.i");
+ ResI = Op.LHS.second
+ ? Builder.CreateFMul(Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.first, "mul.il")
+ : Builder.CreateFMul(Op.LHS.first, Op.RHS.second, "mul.ir");
} else {
+ assert(Op.LHS.second && Op.RHS.second &&
+ "Both operands of integer complex operators must be complex!");
Value *ResRl = Builder.CreateMul(Op.LHS.first, Op.RHS.first, "mul.rl");
- Value *ResRr = Builder.CreateMul(Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.second,"mul.rr");
- ResR = Builder.CreateSub(ResRl, ResRr, "mul.r");
+ Value *ResRr = Builder.CreateMul(Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.second, "mul.rr");
+ ResR = Builder.CreateSub(ResRl, ResRr, "mul.r");
Value *ResIl = Builder.CreateMul(Op.LHS.second, Op.RHS.first, "mul.il");
Value *ResIr = Builder.CreateMul(Op.LHS.first, Op.RHS.second, "mul.ir");
- ResI = Builder.CreateAdd(ResIl, ResIr, "mul.i");
+ ResI = Builder.CreateAdd(ResIl, ResIr, "mul.i");
}
return ComplexPairTy(ResR, ResI);
}
+// See C11 Annex G.5.1 for the semantics of multiplicative operators on complex
+// typed values.
ComplexPairTy ComplexExprEmitter::EmitBinDiv(const BinOpInfo &Op) {
llvm::Value *LHSr = Op.LHS.first, *LHSi = Op.LHS.second;
llvm::Value *RHSr = Op.RHS.first, *RHSi = Op.RHS.second;
llvm::Value *DSTr, *DSTi;
- if (Op.LHS.first->getType()->isFloatingPointTy()) {
- // (a+ib) / (c+id) = ((ac+bd)/(cc+dd)) + i((bc-ad)/(cc+dd))
- llvm::Value *Tmp1 = Builder.CreateFMul(LHSr, RHSr); // a*c
- llvm::Value *Tmp2 = Builder.CreateFMul(LHSi, RHSi); // b*d
- llvm::Value *Tmp3 = Builder.CreateFAdd(Tmp1, Tmp2); // ac+bd
-
- llvm::Value *Tmp4 = Builder.CreateFMul(RHSr, RHSr); // c*c
- llvm::Value *Tmp5 = Builder.CreateFMul(RHSi, RHSi); // d*d
- llvm::Value *Tmp6 = Builder.CreateFAdd(Tmp4, Tmp5); // cc+dd
-
- llvm::Value *Tmp7 = Builder.CreateFMul(LHSi, RHSr); // b*c
- llvm::Value *Tmp8 = Builder.CreateFMul(LHSr, RHSi); // a*d
- llvm::Value *Tmp9 = Builder.CreateFSub(Tmp7, Tmp8); // bc-ad
+ if (LHSr->getType()->isFloatingPointTy()) {
+ // If we have a complex operand on the RHS, we delegate to a libcall to
+ // handle all of the complexities and minimize underflow/overflow cases.
+ //
+ // FIXME: We would be able to avoid the libcall in many places if we
+ // supported imaginary types in addition to complex types.
+ if (RHSi) {
+ BinOpInfo LibCallOp = Op;
+ // If LHS was a real, supply a null imaginary part.
+ if (!LHSi)
+ LibCallOp.LHS.second = llvm::Constant::getNullValue(LHSr->getType());
+
+ StringRef LibCallName;
+ switch (LHSr->getType()->getTypeID()) {
+ default:
+ llvm_unreachable("Unsupported floating point type!");
+ case llvm::Type::HalfTyID:
+ return EmitComplexBinOpLibCall("__divhc3", LibCallOp);
+ case llvm::Type::FloatTyID:
+ return EmitComplexBinOpLibCall("__divsc3", LibCallOp);
+ case llvm::Type::DoubleTyID:
+ return EmitComplexBinOpLibCall("__divdc3", LibCallOp);
+ case llvm::Type::X86_FP80TyID:
+ return EmitComplexBinOpLibCall("__divxc3", LibCallOp);
+ }
+ }
+ assert(LHSi && "Can have at most one non-complex operand!");
- DSTr = Builder.CreateFDiv(Tmp3, Tmp6);
- DSTi = Builder.CreateFDiv(Tmp9, Tmp6);
+ DSTr = Builder.CreateFDiv(LHSr, RHSr);
+ DSTi = Builder.CreateFDiv(LHSi, RHSr);
} else {
+ assert(Op.LHS.second && Op.RHS.second &&
+ "Both operands of integer complex operators must be complex!");
// (a+ib) / (c+id) = ((ac+bd)/(cc+dd)) + i((bc-ad)/(cc+dd))
llvm::Value *Tmp1 = Builder.CreateMul(LHSr, RHSr); // a*c
llvm::Value *Tmp2 = Builder.CreateMul(LHSi, RHSi); // b*d
@@ -626,8 +731,15 @@ ComplexExprEmitter::EmitBinOps(const BinaryOperator *E) {
TestAndClearIgnoreReal();
TestAndClearIgnoreImag();
BinOpInfo Ops;
- Ops.LHS = Visit(E->getLHS());
- Ops.RHS = Visit(E->getRHS());
+ if (E->getLHS()->getType()->isRealFloatingType())
+ Ops.LHS = ComplexPairTy(CGF.EmitScalarExpr(E->getLHS()), nullptr);
+ else
+ Ops.LHS = Visit(E->getLHS());
+ if (E->getRHS()->getType()->isRealFloatingType())
+ Ops.RHS = ComplexPairTy(CGF.EmitScalarExpr(E->getRHS()), nullptr);
+ else
+ Ops.RHS = Visit(E->getRHS());
+
Ops.Ty = E->getType();
return Ops;
}
@@ -647,12 +759,19 @@ EmitCompoundAssignLValue(const CompoundAssignOperator *E,
// __block variables need to have the rhs evaluated first, plus this should
// improve codegen a little.
OpInfo.Ty = E->getComputationResultType();
+ QualType ComplexElementTy = cast<ComplexType>(OpInfo.Ty)->getElementType();
// The RHS should have been converted to the computation type.
- assert(OpInfo.Ty->isAnyComplexType());
- assert(CGF.getContext().hasSameUnqualifiedType(OpInfo.Ty,
- E->getRHS()->getType()));
- OpInfo.RHS = Visit(E->getRHS());
+ if (E->getRHS()->getType()->isRealFloatingType()) {
+ assert(
+ CGF.getContext()
+ .hasSameUnqualifiedType(ComplexElementTy, E->getRHS()->getType()));
+ OpInfo.RHS = ComplexPairTy(CGF.EmitScalarExpr(E->getRHS()), nullptr);
+ } else {
+ assert(CGF.getContext()
+ .hasSameUnqualifiedType(OpInfo.Ty, E->getRHS()->getType()));
+ OpInfo.RHS = Visit(E->getRHS());
+ }
LValue LHS = CGF.EmitLValue(E->getLHS());
@@ -662,7 +781,15 @@ EmitCompoundAssignLValue(const CompoundAssignOperator *E,
OpInfo.LHS = EmitComplexToComplexCast(LHSVal, LHSTy, OpInfo.Ty);
} else {
llvm::Value *LHSVal = CGF.EmitLoadOfScalar(LHS, E->getExprLoc());
- OpInfo.LHS = EmitScalarToComplexCast(LHSVal, LHSTy, OpInfo.Ty);
+ // For floating point real operands we can directly pass the scalar form
+ // to the binary operator emission and potentially get more efficient code.
+ if (LHSTy->isRealFloatingType()) {
+ if (!CGF.getContext().hasSameUnqualifiedType(ComplexElementTy, LHSTy))
+ LHSVal = CGF.EmitScalarConversion(LHSVal, LHSTy, ComplexElementTy);
+ OpInfo.LHS = ComplexPairTy(LHSVal, nullptr);
+ } else {
+ OpInfo.LHS = EmitScalarToComplexCast(LHSVal, LHSTy, OpInfo.Ty);
+ }
}
// Expand the binary operator.
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud