diff options
-rw-r--r-- | polly/lib/Analysis/ScopInfo.cpp | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | polly/test/ScopInfo/unprofitable_scalar-accs.ll | 97 |
2 files changed, 103 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/polly/lib/Analysis/ScopInfo.cpp b/polly/lib/Analysis/ScopInfo.cpp index 64f3b472689..174160ff259 100644 --- a/polly/lib/Analysis/ScopInfo.cpp +++ b/polly/lib/Analysis/ScopInfo.cpp @@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ static cl::opt<bool> cl::desc("Abort if an isl error is encountered"), cl::init(true), cl::cat(PollyCategory)); +static cl::opt<bool> UnprofitableScalarAccs( + "polly-unprofitable-scalar-accs", + cl::desc("Count statements with scalar accesses as not optimizable"), + cl::Hidden, cl::init(true), cl::cat(PollyCategory)); + //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // Create a sequence of two schedules. Either argument may be null and is @@ -3650,7 +3655,7 @@ bool Scop::isProfitable() const { ContainsScalarAccs |= MA->isScalarKind(); } - if (ContainsArrayAccs && !ContainsScalarAccs) + if (!UnprofitableScalarAccs || (ContainsArrayAccs && !ContainsScalarAccs)) OptimizableStmtsOrLoops += Stmt.getNumIterators(); } diff --git a/polly/test/ScopInfo/unprofitable_scalar-accs.ll b/polly/test/ScopInfo/unprofitable_scalar-accs.ll new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c8b31de9f2f --- /dev/null +++ b/polly/test/ScopInfo/unprofitable_scalar-accs.ll @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-process-unprofitable=false -polly-unprofitable-scalar-accs=false -polly-scops -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s +; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-process-unprofitable=false -polly-unprofitable-scalar-accs=true -polly-scops -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=HEURISTIC + +; Check the effect of -polly-unprofitable-scalar-accs + +target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" + +define void @func(i32 %n, i32 %m, double* noalias nonnull %A) { +entry: + br label %outer.for + +outer.for: + %j = phi i32 [0, %entry], [%j.inc, %outer.inc] + %j.cmp = icmp slt i32 %j, %n + br i1 %j.cmp, label %inner.for, label %outer.exit + + inner.for: + %i = phi i32 [1, %outer.for], [%i.inc, %inner.inc] + %b = phi double [0.0, %outer.for], [%a, %inner.inc] + %i.cmp = icmp slt i32 %i, %m + br i1 %i.cmp, label %body1, label %inner.exit + + body1: + %A_idx = getelementptr inbounds double, double* %A, i32 %i + %a = load double, double* %A_idx + store double %a, double* %A_idx + br label %inner.inc + + inner.inc: + %i.inc = add nuw nsw i32 %i, 1 + br label %inner.for + + inner.exit: + br label %outer.inc + +outer.inc: + store double %b, double* %A + %j.inc = add nuw nsw i32 %j, 1 + br label %outer.for + +outer.exit: + br label %return + +return: + ret void +} + + +; CHECK: Statements { +; CHECK-NEXT: Stmt_outer_for +; CHECK-NEXT: Domain := +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_outer_for[i0] : 0 <= i0 <= n; Stmt_outer_for[0] : n < 0 }; +; CHECK-NEXT: Schedule := +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_outer_for[i0] -> [i0, 0, 0, 0] : i0 <= n; Stmt_outer_for[0] -> [0, 0, 0, 0] : n < 0 }; +; CHECK-NEXT: MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1] +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_outer_for[i0] -> MemRef_b__phi[] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: Stmt_inner_for +; CHECK-NEXT: Domain := +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_inner_for[i0, i1] : 0 <= i0 < n and 0 <= i1 < m; Stmt_inner_for[i0, 0] : m <= 0 and 0 <= i0 < n }; +; CHECK-NEXT: Schedule := +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_inner_for[i0, i1] -> [i0, 1, i1, 0] : i1 < m; Stmt_inner_for[i0, 0] -> [i0, 1, 0, 0] : m <= 0 }; +; CHECK-NEXT: ReadAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1] +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_inner_for[i0, i1] -> MemRef_b__phi[] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1] +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_inner_for[i0, i1] -> MemRef_b[] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: Stmt_body1 +; CHECK-NEXT: Domain := +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_body1[i0, i1] : 0 <= i0 < n and 0 <= i1 <= -2 + m }; +; CHECK-NEXT: Schedule := +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_body1[i0, i1] -> [i0, 1, i1, 1] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1] +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_body1[i0, i1] -> MemRef_a[] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: ReadAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0] +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_body1[i0, i1] -> MemRef_A[1 + i1] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0] +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_body1[i0, i1] -> MemRef_A[1 + i1] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: Stmt_inner_inc +; CHECK-NEXT: Domain := +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_inner_inc[i0, i1] : 0 <= i0 < n and 0 <= i1 <= -2 + m }; +; CHECK-NEXT: Schedule := +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_inner_inc[i0, i1] -> [i0, 1, i1, 2] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: ReadAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1] +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_inner_inc[i0, i1] -> MemRef_a[] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1] +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_inner_inc[i0, i1] -> MemRef_b__phi[] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: Stmt_outer_inc +; CHECK-NEXT: Domain := +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_outer_inc[i0] : 0 <= i0 < n }; +; CHECK-NEXT: Schedule := +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_outer_inc[i0] -> [i0, 2, 0, 0] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0] +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_outer_inc[i0] -> MemRef_A[0] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: ReadAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1] +; CHECK-NEXT: [n, m] -> { Stmt_outer_inc[i0] -> MemRef_b[] }; +; CHECK-NEXT: } + +; HEURISTIC-NOT: Statements |