summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat
-rw-r--r--llvm/unittests/IR/DominatorTreeTest.cpp268
1 files changed, 268 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/IR/DominatorTreeTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/IR/DominatorTreeTest.cpp
index df1e2993dc8..5856d5539a0 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/IR/DominatorTreeTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/IR/DominatorTreeTest.cpp
@@ -326,6 +326,274 @@ TEST(DominatorTree, NonUniqueEdges) {
});
}
+// Verify that the PDT is correctly updated in case an edge removal results
+// in a new unreachable CFG node.
+//
+// For the following input code and initial PDT:
+//
+// CFG PDT
+//
+// A Exit
+// | |
+// _B D
+// / | \ |
+// ^ v \ B
+// \ / D / \
+// C \ C A
+// v
+// Exit
+//
+// we verify that CFG' and PDT-updated is obtained after removal of edge C -> B.
+//
+// CFG' PDT-updated
+//
+// A Exit
+// | |
+// B D
+// | \ |
+// v \ B
+// / D \
+// C \ A
+// | v
+// unreachable Exit
+//
+// WARNING: PDT-updated is inconsistent with PDT-recalculated, which is
+// constructed from CFG' when recalculating the PDT from scratch.
+//
+// PDT-recalculated
+//
+// Exit
+// / | \
+// C B D
+// |
+// A
+//
+// TODO: document the wanted behavior after resolving this inconsistency.
+TEST(DominatorTree, DeletingEdgesIntroducesUnreachables) {
+ StringRef ModuleString =
+ "define void @f() {\n"
+ "A:\n"
+ " br label %B\n"
+ "B:\n"
+ " br i1 undef, label %D, label %C\n"
+ "C:\n"
+ " br label %B\n"
+ "D:\n"
+ " ret void\n"
+ "}\n";
+
+ // Parse the module.
+ LLVMContext Context;
+ std::unique_ptr<Module> M = makeLLVMModule(Context, ModuleString);
+
+ runWithDomTree(
+ *M, "f", [&](Function &F, DominatorTree *DT, PostDomTree *PDT) {
+ Function::iterator FI = F.begin();
+
+ FI++;
+ BasicBlock *B = &*FI++;
+ BasicBlock *C = &*FI++;
+ BasicBlock *D = &*FI++;
+
+ assert(PDT->dominates(PDT->getNode(D), PDT->getNode(B)));
+
+ C->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent();
+ new UnreachableInst(C->getContext(), C);
+
+ DT->deleteEdge(C, B);
+ PDT->deleteEdge(C, B);
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(PDT->dominates(PDT->getNode(D), PDT->getNode(B)));
+ EXPECT_EQ(PDT->getNode(C), nullptr);
+
+ PDT->recalculate(F);
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(PDT->dominates(PDT->getNode(D), PDT->getNode(B)));
+ EXPECT_NE(PDT->getNode(C), nullptr);
+ });
+}
+
+// Verify that the PDT is correctly updated in case an edge removal results
+// in an infinite loop.
+//
+// Test case:
+//
+// CFG PDT
+//
+// A Exit
+// | |
+// _B D
+// / | \ |
+// ^ v \ B
+// \ / D / \
+// C \ C A
+// / \ v
+// ^ v Exit
+// \_/
+//
+// After deleting the edge C->B, C is part of an infinite reverse-unreachable
+// loop:
+//
+// CFG' PDT'
+//
+// A Exit
+// | |
+// B D
+// | \ |
+// v \ B
+// / D \
+// C \ A
+// / \ v
+// ^ v Exit
+// \_/
+//
+// In PDT, D post-dominates B. We verify that this post-dominance
+// relation is preserved _after_ deleting the edge C->B from CFG.
+//
+// As C now becomes reverse-unreachable, it is not anymore part of the
+// PDT. We also verify this property.
+//
+// TODO: Can we change the PDT definition such that C remains part of the
+// CFG, at best without loosing the dominance relation D postdom B.
+TEST(DominatorTree, DeletingEdgesIntroducesInfiniteLoop) {
+ StringRef ModuleString =
+ "define void @f() {\n"
+ "A:\n"
+ " br label %B\n"
+ "B:\n"
+ " br i1 undef, label %D, label %C\n"
+ "C:\n"
+ " switch i32 undef, label %C [\n"
+ " i32 0, label %B\n"
+ " ]\n"
+ "D:\n"
+ " ret void\n"
+ "}\n";
+
+ // Parse the module.
+ LLVMContext Context;
+ std::unique_ptr<Module> M = makeLLVMModule(Context, ModuleString);
+
+ runWithDomTree(
+ *M, "f", [&](Function &F, DominatorTree *DT, PostDomTree *PDT) {
+ Function::iterator FI = F.begin();
+
+ FI++;
+ BasicBlock *B = &*FI++;
+ BasicBlock *C = &*FI++;
+ BasicBlock *D = &*FI++;
+
+ assert(PDT->dominates(PDT->getNode(D), PDT->getNode(B)));
+
+ auto SwitchC = cast<SwitchInst>(C->getTerminator());
+ SwitchC->removeCase(SwitchC->case_begin());
+ DT->deleteEdge(C, B);
+ PDT->deleteEdge(C, B);
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(PDT->dominates(PDT->getNode(D), PDT->getNode(B)));
+ EXPECT_EQ(PDT->getNode(C), nullptr);
+
+ PDT->recalculate(F);
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(PDT->dominates(PDT->getNode(D), PDT->getNode(B)));
+ EXPECT_EQ(PDT->getNode(C), nullptr);
+ });
+}
+
+// Verify that the PDT is correctly updated in case an edge removal results
+// in an infinite loop.
+//
+// Test case:
+//
+// CFG PDT
+//
+// A Exit
+// | / | \
+// B-- C B D
+// | \ |
+// v \ A
+// / D
+// C--C2 \
+// / \ \ v
+// ^ v --Exit
+// \_/
+//
+// After deleting the edge C->E, C is part of an infinite reverse-unreachable
+// loop:
+//
+// CFG' PDT'
+//
+// A Exit
+// | |
+// B D
+// | \ |
+// v \ B
+// / D \
+// C \ A
+// / \ v
+// ^ v Exit
+// \_/
+//
+// In PDT, D does not post-dominate B. After the edge C->E is removed, a new
+// post-dominance relation is introduced.
+//
+// As C now becomes reverse-unreachable, it is not anymore part of the
+// PDT. We also verify this property.
+//
+// TODO: Can we change the PDT definition such that C remains part of the
+// CFG, at best without loosing the dominance relation D postdom B.
+TEST(DominatorTree, DeletingEdgesIntroducesInfiniteLoop2) {
+ StringRef ModuleString =
+ "define void @f() {\n"
+ "A:\n"
+ " br label %B\n"
+ "B:\n"
+ " br i1 undef, label %D, label %C\n"
+ "C:\n"
+ " switch i32 undef, label %C [\n"
+ " i32 0, label %C2\n"
+ " ]\n"
+ "C2:\n"
+ " ret void\n"
+ "D:\n"
+ " ret void\n"
+ "}\n";
+
+ // Parse the module.
+ LLVMContext Context;
+ std::unique_ptr<Module> M = makeLLVMModule(Context, ModuleString);
+
+ runWithDomTree(
+ *M, "f", [&](Function &F, DominatorTree *DT, PostDomTree *PDT) {
+ Function::iterator FI = F.begin();
+
+ FI++;
+ BasicBlock *B = &*FI++;
+ BasicBlock *C = &*FI++;
+ BasicBlock *C2 = &*FI++;
+ BasicBlock *D = &*FI++;
+
+ auto SwitchC = cast<SwitchInst>(C->getTerminator());
+ SwitchC->removeCase(SwitchC->case_begin());
+ DT->deleteEdge(C, C2);
+ PDT->deleteEdge(C, C2);
+ C2->eraseFromParent();
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(DT->getNode(C2), nullptr);
+ PDT->eraseNode(C2);
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(PDT->dominates(PDT->getNode(D), PDT->getNode(B)));
+ EXPECT_EQ(PDT->getNode(C), nullptr);
+ EXPECT_EQ(PDT->getNode(C2), nullptr);
+
+ PDT->recalculate(F);
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(PDT->dominates(PDT->getNode(D), PDT->getNode(B)));
+ EXPECT_EQ(PDT->getNode(C), nullptr);
+ EXPECT_EQ(PDT->getNode(C2), nullptr);
+ });
+}
+
namespace {
const auto Insert = CFGBuilder::ActionKind::Insert;
const auto Delete = CFGBuilder::ActionKind::Delete;
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud