diff options
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | clang/test/Parser/attributes.c | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | clang/test/Sema/gnu-attributes.c | 18 |
3 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp index 380b6d77940..99cb853b7dc 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@ bool Parser::isValidAfterTypeSpecifier(bool CouldBeBitfield) { case tok::kw___declspec: // struct foo {...} __declspec(...) case tok::l_square: // void f(struct f [ 3]) case tok::ellipsis: // void f(struct f ... [Ns]) + // FIXME: we should emit semantic diagnostic when declaration + // attribute is in type attribute position. + case tok::kw___attribute: // struct foo __attribute__((used)) x; return true; case tok::colon: return CouldBeBitfield; // enum E { ... } : 2; diff --git a/clang/test/Parser/attributes.c b/clang/test/Parser/attributes.c index 3d69c72c322..b815b8da3dc 100644 --- a/clang/test/Parser/attributes.c +++ b/clang/test/Parser/attributes.c @@ -95,3 +95,13 @@ void testFundef5() __attribute__(()) { } __attribute__((pure)) int testFundef6(int a) { return a; } void deprecatedTestFun(void) __attribute__((deprecated())); + +struct s { + int a; +}; + +// This test ensure compatibility with parsing GNU-style attributes +// where the attribute is on a separate line from the elaborated type +// specifier. +struct s +__attribute__((used)) bar; diff --git a/clang/test/Sema/gnu-attributes.c b/clang/test/Sema/gnu-attributes.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..653fae826a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/clang/test/Sema/gnu-attributes.c @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s +// expected-no-diagnostics + +struct s {}; + +// FIXME: should warn that declaration attribute in type position is +// being applied to the declaration instead? +struct s __attribute__((used)) foo; + +// FIXME: Should warn that type attribute in declaration position is +// being applied to the type instead? +struct s *bar __attribute__((address_space(1))); + +// Should not warn because type attribute is in type position. +struct s *__attribute__((address_space(1))) baz; + +// Should not warn because declaration attribute is in declaration position. +struct s *quux __attribute__((used)); |