summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBenjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com>2015-06-27 20:33:26 +0000
committerBenjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com>2015-06-27 20:33:26 +0000
commit5b455f0b62fbd0767ac4faa1cbb01f41799834a3 (patch)
treeb4adbcfae0c8f3bbc5d51347195381e0ad085040 /llvm
parent57c7a62b973e909c29a7da46bae11051b16a5de8 (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-5b455f0b62fbd0767ac4faa1cbb01f41799834a3.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-5b455f0b62fbd0767ac4faa1cbb01f41799834a3.zip
[SDAG] Now that we have a way to communicate the exact bit on sdiv use it to simplify sdiv by a constant.
We had a hack in SDAGBuilder in place to work around this but now we can avoid that. Call BuildExactSDIV from BuildSDIV so DAGCombiner can perform this trick automatically. The added check in DAGCombiner is necessary to prevent exact sdiv by pow2 from regressing as the target-specific pow2 lowering is not aware of exact bits yet. This is mostly covered by existing tests. One side effect is that we get the better lowering for exact vector sdivs now too :) llvm-svn: 240891
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm')
-rw-r--r--llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h2
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp4
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp16
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp20
-rw-r--r--llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/sdiv-exact.ll13
5 files changed, 34 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h
index 6f9692ece15..80826cb6c3e 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h
@@ -2718,8 +2718,6 @@ public:
//===--------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Div utility functions
//
- SDValue BuildExactSDIV(SDValue Op1, SDValue Op2, SDLoc dl,
- SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
SDValue BuildSDIV(SDNode *N, const APInt &Divisor, SelectionDAG &DAG,
bool IsAfterLegalization,
std::vector<SDNode *> *Created) const;
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
index 2c4ab8b9f8f..29f9df6425e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
@@ -2178,7 +2178,11 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSDIV(SDNode *N) {
}
// fold (sdiv X, pow2) -> simple ops after legalize
+ // FIXME: We check for the exact bit here because the generic lowering gives
+ // better results in that case. The target-specific lowering should learn how
+ // to handle exact sdivs efficiently.
if (N1C && !N1C->isNullValue() && !N1C->isOpaque() &&
+ !cast<BinaryWithFlagsSDNode>(N)->Flags.hasExact() &&
(N1C->getAPIntValue().isPowerOf2() ||
(-N1C->getAPIntValue()).isPowerOf2())) {
// If dividing by powers of two is cheap, then don't perform the following
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
index 329c1706171..85b2d5f62ff 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
@@ -2238,17 +2238,11 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitSDiv(const User &I) {
SDValue Op1 = getValue(I.getOperand(0));
SDValue Op2 = getValue(I.getOperand(1));
- // Turn exact SDivs into multiplications.
- // FIXME: This should be in DAGCombiner, but it doesn't have access to the
- // exact bit.
- if (isa<BinaryOperator>(&I) && cast<BinaryOperator>(&I)->isExact() &&
- !isa<ConstantSDNode>(Op1) &&
- isa<ConstantSDNode>(Op2) && !cast<ConstantSDNode>(Op2)->isNullValue())
- setValue(&I, DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo()
- .BuildExactSDIV(Op1, Op2, getCurSDLoc(), DAG));
- else
- setValue(&I, DAG.getNode(ISD::SDIV, getCurSDLoc(), Op1.getValueType(),
- Op1, Op2));
+ SDNodeFlags Flags;
+ Flags.setExact(isa<PossiblyExactOperator>(&I) &&
+ cast<PossiblyExactOperator>(&I)->isExact());
+ setValue(&I, DAG.getNode(ISD::SDIV, getCurSDLoc(), Op1.getValueType(), Op1,
+ Op2, &Flags));
}
void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitICmp(const User &I) {
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
index fc746588e69..e7722b392a8 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
@@ -2674,10 +2674,9 @@ void TargetLowering::ComputeConstraintToUse(AsmOperandInfo &OpInfo,
/// \brief Given an exact SDIV by a constant, create a multiplication
/// with the multiplicative inverse of the constant.
-SDValue TargetLowering::BuildExactSDIV(SDValue Op1, SDValue Op2, SDLoc dl,
- SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
- ConstantSDNode *C = cast<ConstantSDNode>(Op2);
- APInt d = C->getAPIntValue();
+static SDValue BuildExactSDIV(const TargetLowering &TLI, SDValue Op1, APInt d,
+ SDLoc dl, SelectionDAG &DAG,
+ std::vector<SDNode *> &Created) {
assert(d != 0 && "Division by zero!");
// Shift the value upfront if it is even, so the LSB is one.
@@ -2685,10 +2684,11 @@ SDValue TargetLowering::BuildExactSDIV(SDValue Op1, SDValue Op2, SDLoc dl,
if (ShAmt) {
// TODO: For UDIV use SRL instead of SRA.
SDValue Amt =
- DAG.getConstant(ShAmt, dl, getShiftAmountTy(Op1.getValueType()));
+ DAG.getConstant(ShAmt, dl, TLI.getShiftAmountTy(Op1.getValueType()));
SDNodeFlags Flags;
Flags.setExact(true);
Op1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SRA, dl, Op1.getValueType(), Op1, Amt, &Flags);
+ Created.push_back(Op1.getNode());
d = d.ashr(ShAmt);
}
@@ -2697,8 +2697,10 @@ SDValue TargetLowering::BuildExactSDIV(SDValue Op1, SDValue Op2, SDLoc dl,
while ((t = d*xn) != 1)
xn *= APInt(d.getBitWidth(), 2) - t;
- Op2 = DAG.getConstant(xn, dl, Op1.getValueType());
- return DAG.getNode(ISD::MUL, dl, Op1.getValueType(), Op1, Op2);
+ SDValue Op2 = DAG.getConstant(xn, dl, Op1.getValueType());
+ SDValue Mul = DAG.getNode(ISD::MUL, dl, Op1.getValueType(), Op1, Op2);
+ Created.push_back(Mul.getNode());
+ return Mul;
}
/// \brief Given an ISD::SDIV node expressing a divide by constant,
@@ -2718,6 +2720,10 @@ SDValue TargetLowering::BuildSDIV(SDNode *N, const APInt &Divisor,
if (!isTypeLegal(VT))
return SDValue();
+ // If the sdiv has an 'exact' bit we can use a simpler lowering.
+ if (cast<BinaryWithFlagsSDNode>(N)->Flags.hasExact())
+ return BuildExactSDIV(*this, N->getOperand(0), Divisor, dl, DAG, *Created);
+
APInt::ms magics = Divisor.magic();
// Multiply the numerator (operand 0) by the magic value
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/sdiv-exact.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/sdiv-exact.ll
index 4f8d3f05351..a6ace5bc31c 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/sdiv-exact.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/sdiv-exact.ll
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: llc -march=x86 < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc -march=x86 -mattr=+sse2 < %s | FileCheck %s
define i32 @test1(i32 %x) {
%div = sdiv exact i32 %x, 25
@@ -16,3 +16,14 @@ define i32 @test2(i32 %x) {
; CHECK-NEXT: imull $-1431655765
; CHECK-NEXT: ret
}
+
+define <4 x i32> @test3(<4 x i32> %x) {
+ %div = sdiv exact <4 x i32> %x, <i32 24, i32 24, i32 24, i32 24>
+ ret <4 x i32> %div
+; CHECK-LABEL: test3:
+; CHECK: psrad $3,
+; CHECK: pmuludq
+; CHECK: pmuludq
+; CHECK-NOT: psrad
+; CHECK: ret
+}
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud