diff options
| author | Fedor Sergeev <fedor.sergeev@azul.com> | 2018-08-29 19:10:44 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Fedor Sergeev <fedor.sergeev@azul.com> | 2018-08-29 19:10:44 +0000 |
| commit | 7b49aa03af9877ede00a100c6b178414e2f8656d (patch) | |
| tree | 4dfde49be225ff4961d62462ec1088baba3d60ea /llvm/test | |
| parent | cf311cfc20a363ba1ee1a8115ab307d6745a6b73 (diff) | |
| download | bcm5719-llvm-7b49aa03af9877ede00a100c6b178414e2f8656d.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-7b49aa03af9877ede00a100c6b178414e2f8656d.zip | |
[SimpleLoopUnswitch] After unswitch delete dead blocks in parent loops
Summary:
Assert from PR38737 happens on the dead block inside the parent loop
after unswitching nontrivial switch in the inner loop.
deleteDeadBlocksFromLoop now takes extra care to detect/remove dead
blocks in all the parent loops in addition to the blocks from original
loop being unswitched.
Reviewers: asbirlea, chandlerc
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51415
llvm-svn: 340955
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/test')
| -rw-r--r-- | llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/delete-dead-blocks.ll | 45 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/delete-dead-blocks.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/delete-dead-blocks.ll new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0be1c8549ed --- /dev/null +++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/delete-dead-blocks.ll @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +; RUN: opt < %s -simple-loop-unswitch -enable-nontrivial-unswitch -S 2>&1 | FileCheck %s +; RUN: opt < %s -passes=unswitch -enable-nontrivial-unswitch -S 2>&1 | FileCheck %s +; +; Checking that (dead) blocks from inner loop are deleted after unswitch. +; +declare void @foo() + +; CHECK-LABEL: @Test +define void @Test(i32) { +entry: + br label %outer +outer: + %oi = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %oinc, %outer_continue] + br label %inner +inner: + %ii = phi i32 [ 0, %outer ], [ %iinc, %continue] + call void @foo() + switch i32 %0, label %get_out2 [ + i32 0, label %continue + i32 1, label %case1 + i32 2, label %get_out + ] +; +; since we unswitch on the above switch, %case1 and %continue blocks +; become dead in the original loop +; +; CHECK-NOT: case1: +case1: + br label %continue +; CHECK-NOT: {{^}}continue: +continue: + %iinc = add i32 %ii, 1 + %icmp = icmp eq i32 %ii, 100 + br i1 %icmp, label %inner, label %outer_continue + +outer_continue: + %oinc = add i32 %oi, 1 + %ocmp = icmp eq i32 %oi, 100 + br i1 %ocmp, label %outer, label %get_out + +get_out: + ret void +get_out2: + unreachable +} |

