Even more explanation.

llvm-svn: 93841

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
index 684e1fc573d..445318e64fb 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
@@ -257,6 +257,18 @@ void X86TargetMachine::setCodeModelForJIT() {
 /// to bugs or other conditions. We will default to a 4-byte encoding unless the
 /// system tells us otherwise.
 ///
+/// The issue is when the CIE says their is an LSDA. That mandates that every
+/// FDE have an LSDA slot. But if the function does not need an LSDA. There
+/// needs to be some way to signify there is none. The LSDA is encoded as
+/// pc-rel. But you don't look for some magic value after adding the pc. You
+/// have to look for a zero before adding the pc. The problem is that the size
+/// of the zero to look for depends on the encoding. The unwinder bug in SL is
+/// that it always checks for a pointer-size zero. So on x86_64 it looks for 8
+/// bytes of zero. If you have an LSDA, it works fine since the 8-bytes are
+/// non-zero so it goes ahead and then reads the value based on the encoding.
+/// But if you use sdata4 and there is no LSDA, then the test for zero gives a
+/// false negative and the unwinder thinks there is an LSDA.
+///
 /// FIXME: This call-back isn't good! We should be using the correct encoding
 /// regardless of the system. However, there are some systems which have bugs
 /// that prevent this from occuring.