LiveInterval: Fix computeFromMainRange() producing adjacent segments with same valno

If two livesegments from different subranges happened to have the same
definition they could possibly end up as two adjacent segments in the
main liverange with the same value number which is not allowed. Detect
such cases and fix them in the 2nd pass of computeFromMainRange() if
necessary.

No testcase as there is only an out-of-tree target where I can sensibly
come up with one.

llvm-svn: 234382

1 files changed, 45 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp
index 2afd7faaea9..246d21089e6 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp
@@ -816,23 +816,46 @@ static VNInfo *searchForVNI(const SlotIndexes &Indexes, LiveRange &LR,
 
 static void determineMissingVNIs(const SlotIndexes &Indexes, LiveInterval &LI) {
   SmallPtrSet<const MachineBasicBlock*, 5> Visited;
-  for (LiveRange::Segment &S : LI.segments) {
-    if (S.valno != nullptr)
-      continue;
-    // This can only happen at the begin of a basic block.
-    assert(S.start.isBlock() && "valno should only be missing at block begin");
-
-    Visited.clear();
-    const MachineBasicBlock *MBB = Indexes.getMBBFromIndex(S.start);
-    for (const MachineBasicBlock *Pred : MBB->predecessors()) {
-      VNInfo *VNI = searchForVNI(Indexes, LI, Pred, Visited);
-      if (VNI != nullptr) {
-        S.valno = VNI;
-        break;
+
+  LiveRange::iterator OutIt;
+  VNInfo *PrevValNo = nullptr;
+  for (LiveRange::iterator I = LI.begin(), E = LI.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+    LiveRange::Segment &S = *I;
+    // Determine final VNI if necessary.
+    if (S.valno == nullptr) {
+      // This can only happen at the begin of a basic block.
+      assert(S.start.isBlock() && "valno should only be missing at block begin");
+
+      Visited.clear();
+      const MachineBasicBlock *MBB = Indexes.getMBBFromIndex(S.start);
+      for (const MachineBasicBlock *Pred : MBB->predecessors()) {
+        VNInfo *VNI = searchForVNI(Indexes, LI, Pred, Visited);
+        if (VNI != nullptr) {
+          S.valno = VNI;
+          break;
+        }
       }
+      assert(S.valno != nullptr && "could not determine valno");
+    }
+    // Merge with previous segment if it has the same VNI.
+    if (PrevValNo == S.valno && OutIt->end == S.start) {
+      fprintf(stderr, "Adjancency fix\n");
+      OutIt->end = S.end;
+    } else {
+      // Didn't merge. Move OutIt to next segment.
+      if (PrevValNo == nullptr)
+        OutIt = LI.begin();
+      else
+        ++OutIt;
+
+      if (OutIt != I)
+        *OutIt = *I;
+      PrevValNo = S.valno;
     }
-    assert(S.valno != nullptr && "could not determine valno");
   }
+  // If we merged some segments chop off the end.
+  ++OutIt;
+  LI.segments.erase(OutIt, LI.end());
 }
 
 void LiveInterval::constructMainRangeFromSubranges(
@@ -955,6 +978,14 @@ void LiveInterval::constructMainRangeFromSubranges(
             NeedVNIFixup = true;
         }
 
+        // In rare cases we can produce adjacent segments with the same value
+        // number (if they come from different subranges, but happen to have
+        // the same defining instruction). VNIFixup will fix those cases.
+        if (!empty() && segments.back().end == Pos &&
+            segments.back().valno == VNI) {
+          fprintf(stderr, "Need Adjacency fixup\n");
+          NeedVNIFixup = true;
+        }
         CurrentSegment.start = Pos;
         CurrentSegment.valno = VNI;
         ConstructingSegment = true;