Rename llvm.frameescape and llvm.framerecover to localescape and localrecover

Summary:
Initially, these intrinsics seemed like part of a family of "frame"
related intrinsics, but now I think that's more confusing than helpful.
Initially, the LangRef specified that this would create a new kind of
allocation that would be allocated at a fixed offset from the frame
pointer (EBP/RBP). We ended up dropping that design, and leaving the
stack frame layout alone.

These intrinsics are really about sharing local stack allocations, not
frame pointers. I intend to go further and add an `llvm.localaddress()`
intrinsic that returns whatever register (EBP, ESI, ESP, RBX) is being
used to address locals, which should not be confused with the frame
pointer.

Naming suggestions at this point are welcome, I'm happy to re-run sed.

Reviewers: majnemer, nicholas

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11011

llvm-svn: 241633

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp
index 963d573ea7f..941129b5cc9 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ bool DeadMachineInstructionElim::isDead(const MachineInstr *MI) const {
     return false;
 
   // Don't delete frame allocation labels.
-  if (MI->getOpcode() == TargetOpcode::FRAME_ALLOC)
+  if (MI->getOpcode() == TargetOpcode::LOCAL_ESCAPE)
     return false;
 
   // Don't delete instructions with side effects.