summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>2019-05-08 14:50:01 +0000
committerNikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>2019-05-08 14:50:01 +0000
commit9fd02a71a39b8e923e3a2ede6b9640871d503e2b (patch)
tree6e9767b686b3d87950fd279126075275c29cbae3 /llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
parent4964e3837e406e6375488fd9ecad82bea2a1881b (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-9fd02a71a39b8e923e3a2ede6b9640871d503e2b.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-9fd02a71a39b8e923e3a2ede6b9640871d503e2b.zip
Revert "[ValueTracking] Improve isKnowNonZero for Ints"
This reverts commit 3b137a495686bd6018d115ea82fb8bb7718349fd. As reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D60846, this is causing miscompiles. llvm-svn: 360260
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp26
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
index 839f539707a..54575441b71 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
@@ -1893,9 +1893,10 @@ static bool isGEPKnownNonNull(const GEPOperator *GEP, unsigned Depth,
return false;
}
-static bool isKnownNonZeroFromDominatingCondition(const Value *V,
+static bool isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition(const Value *V,
const Instruction *CtxI,
const DominatorTree *DT) {
+ assert(V->getType()->isPointerTy() && "V must be pointer type");
assert(!isa<ConstantData>(V) && "Did not expect ConstantPointerNull");
if (!CtxI || !DT)
@@ -1908,15 +1909,14 @@ static bool isKnownNonZeroFromDominatingCondition(const Value *V,
break;
NumUsesExplored++;
- // If the value is a pointer and used as an argument to a call or invoke,
- // then argument attributes may provide an answer about null-ness.
- if (V->getType()->isPointerTy())
- if (auto CS = ImmutableCallSite(U))
- if (auto *CalledFunc = CS.getCalledFunction())
- for (const Argument &Arg : CalledFunc->args())
- if (CS.getArgOperand(Arg.getArgNo()) == V &&
- Arg.hasNonNullAttr() && DT->dominates(CS.getInstruction(), CtxI))
- return true;
+ // If the value is used as an argument to a call or invoke, then argument
+ // attributes may provide an answer about null-ness.
+ if (auto CS = ImmutableCallSite(U))
+ if (auto *CalledFunc = CS.getCalledFunction())
+ for (const Argument &Arg : CalledFunc->args())
+ if (CS.getArgOperand(Arg.getArgNo()) == V &&
+ Arg.hasNonNullAttr() && DT->dominates(CS.getInstruction(), CtxI))
+ return true;
// Consider only compare instructions uniquely controlling a branch
CmpInst::Predicate Pred;
@@ -2064,11 +2064,11 @@ bool isKnownNonZero(const Value *V, unsigned Depth, const Query &Q) {
}
- if (isKnownNonZeroFromDominatingCondition(V, Q.CxtI, Q.DT))
- return true;
-
// Check for recursive pointer simplifications.
if (V->getType()->isPointerTy()) {
+ if (isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition(V, Q.CxtI, Q.DT))
+ return true;
+
// Look through bitcast operations, GEPs, and int2ptr instructions as they
// do not alter the value, or at least not the nullness property of the
// value, e.g., int2ptr is allowed to zero/sign extend the value.
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud