diff options
author | Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> | 2019-12-03 17:45:47 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> | 2019-12-03 20:04:51 +0300 |
commit | 9a20c79ddc2523fb68be4d4246d7835c761c382f (patch) | |
tree | 064eab89c1f5fe78847c52311ad22de67a89b054 /llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp | |
parent | 372ad32734ecb455f9fb4d0601229ca2dfc78b66 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-9a20c79ddc2523fb68be4d4246d7835c761c382f.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-9a20c79ddc2523fb68be4d4246d7835c761c382f.zip |
[NFC][KnownBits] Add getMinValue() / getMaxValue() methods
As it can be seen from accompanying cleanup, it is not unheard of
to write `~Known.Zero` meaning "what maximal value can this KnownBits
produce". But i think `~Known.Zero` isn't *that* self-explanatory,
as compared to a method with a name.
Note that not all `~Known.Zero` places were cleaned up,
only those where this arguably improves things.
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp index 51d92cca214..f46bae77ba2 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp @@ -915,7 +915,7 @@ static void computeKnownBitsFromShiftOperator( // If the shift amount could be greater than or equal to the bit-width of the // LHS, the value could be poison, but bail out because the check below is // expensive. TODO: Should we just carry on? - if ((~Known.Zero).uge(BitWidth)) { + if (Known.getMaxValue().uge(BitWidth)) { Known.resetAll(); return; } |