summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>2019-11-13 11:59:22 +0100
committerHans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>2019-11-13 12:19:02 +0100
commit6ea47759008526dc11f5064b266de95c61915581 (patch)
treec722d72d7942805728803ac106eeb7ba3c362b89 /llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
parentfed17867cd42c5fa8a7a561637d539fbde6f511f (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-6ea47759008526dc11f5064b266de95c61915581.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-6ea47759008526dc11f5064b266de95c61915581.zip
Revert 57dd4b0 "[ValueTracking] Allow context-sensitive nullness check for non-pointers"
This caused miscompiles of Chromium (https://crbug.com/1023818). The reduced repro is small enough to fit here: $ cat /tmp/a.c unsigned char f(unsigned char *p) { unsigned char result = 0; for (int shift = 0; shift < 1; ++shift) result |= p[0] << (shift * 8); return result; } $ bin/clang -O2 -S -o - /tmp/a.c | grep -A4 f: f: # @f .cfi_startproc # %bb.0: # %entry xorl %eax, %eax retq That's nicely optimized, but I don't think it's the right result :-) > Same as D60846 but with a fix for the problem encountered there which > was a missing context adjustment in the handling of PHI nodes. > > The test that caused D60846 to be reverted was added in e15ab8f277c7. > > Reviewers: nikic, nlopes, mkazantsev,spatel, dlrobertson, uabelho, hakzsam > > Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits > > Tags: #llvm > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69571 This reverts commit 57dd4b03e4806bbb4760ab6150940150d884df20.
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp9
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
index b26c6294dce..f03a4a6eee4 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
@@ -1902,8 +1902,8 @@ static bool isGEPKnownNonNull(const GEPOperator *GEP, unsigned Depth,
static bool isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition(const Value *V,
const Instruction *CtxI,
const DominatorTree *DT) {
- if (isa<Constant>(V))
- return false;
+ assert(V->getType()->isPointerTy() && "V must be pointer type");
+ assert(!isa<ConstantData>(V) && "Did not expect ConstantPointerNull");
if (!CtxI || !DT)
return false;
@@ -2078,11 +2078,12 @@ bool isKnownNonZero(const Value *V, unsigned Depth, const Query &Q) {
}
}
- if (isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition(V, Q.CxtI, Q.DT))
- return true;
// Check for recursive pointer simplifications.
if (V->getType()->isPointerTy()) {
+ if (isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition(V, Q.CxtI, Q.DT))
+ return true;
+
// Look through bitcast operations, GEPs, and int2ptr instructions as they
// do not alter the value, or at least not the nullness property of the
// value, e.g., int2ptr is allowed to zero/sign extend the value.
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud