diff options
author | Alexander Kornienko <alexfh@google.com> | 2014-02-11 21:49:21 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexander Kornienko <alexfh@google.com> | 2014-02-11 21:49:21 +0000 |
commit | 4aca9b1cd852fcf4e11fa7ff26b73df6fbef8a4c (patch) | |
tree | 47cedc2956e6546aa7b1dfde24fb906eb2ba8b68 /clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PointerSubChecker.cpp | |
parent | 6bd395f3f02633c1fe2698cfe78ce2302e79b189 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-4aca9b1cd852fcf4e11fa7ff26b73df6fbef8a4c.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-4aca9b1cd852fcf4e11fa7ff26b73df6fbef8a4c.zip |
Expose the name of the checker producing each diagnostic message.
Summary:
In clang-tidy we'd like to know the name of the checker producing each
diagnostic message. PathDiagnostic has BugType and Category fields, which are
both arbitrary human-readable strings, but we need to know the exact name of the
checker in the form that can be used in the CheckersControlList option to
enable/disable the specific checker.
This patch adds the CheckName field to the CheckerBase class, and sets it in
the CheckerManager::registerChecker() method, which gets them from the
CheckerRegistry.
Checkers that implement multiple checks have to store the names of each check
in the respective registerXXXChecker method.
Reviewers: jordan_rose, krememek
Reviewed By: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2557
llvm-svn: 201186
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PointerSubChecker.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PointerSubChecker.cpp | 7 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PointerSubChecker.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PointerSubChecker.cpp index 07c82d46194..8f63cecfd39 100644 --- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PointerSubChecker.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PointerSubChecker.cpp @@ -62,9 +62,10 @@ void PointerSubChecker::checkPreStmt(const BinaryOperator *B, if (ExplodedNode *N = C.addTransition()) { if (!BT) - BT.reset(new BuiltinBug("Pointer subtraction", - "Subtraction of two pointers that do not point to " - "the same memory chunk may cause incorrect result.")); + BT.reset( + new BuiltinBug(this, "Pointer subtraction", + "Subtraction of two pointers that do not point to " + "the same memory chunk may cause incorrect result.")); BugReport *R = new BugReport(*BT, BT->getDescription(), N); R->addRange(B->getSourceRange()); C.emitReport(R); |