diff options
author | Alexander Kornienko <alexfh@google.com> | 2014-02-11 21:49:21 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexander Kornienko <alexfh@google.com> | 2014-02-11 21:49:21 +0000 |
commit | 4aca9b1cd852fcf4e11fa7ff26b73df6fbef8a4c (patch) | |
tree | 47cedc2956e6546aa7b1dfde24fb906eb2ba8b68 /clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ExprInspectionChecker.cpp | |
parent | 6bd395f3f02633c1fe2698cfe78ce2302e79b189 (diff) | |
download | bcm5719-llvm-4aca9b1cd852fcf4e11fa7ff26b73df6fbef8a4c.tar.gz bcm5719-llvm-4aca9b1cd852fcf4e11fa7ff26b73df6fbef8a4c.zip |
Expose the name of the checker producing each diagnostic message.
Summary:
In clang-tidy we'd like to know the name of the checker producing each
diagnostic message. PathDiagnostic has BugType and Category fields, which are
both arbitrary human-readable strings, but we need to know the exact name of the
checker in the form that can be used in the CheckersControlList option to
enable/disable the specific checker.
This patch adds the CheckName field to the CheckerBase class, and sets it in
the CheckerManager::registerChecker() method, which gets them from the
CheckerRegistry.
Checkers that implement multiple checks have to store the names of each check
in the respective registerXXXChecker method.
Reviewers: jordan_rose, krememek
Reviewed By: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2557
llvm-svn: 201186
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ExprInspectionChecker.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ExprInspectionChecker.cpp | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ExprInspectionChecker.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ExprInspectionChecker.cpp index 3ed2435b92e..411c1d14876 100644 --- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ExprInspectionChecker.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ExprInspectionChecker.cpp @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ void ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerEval(const CallExpr *CE, return; if (!BT) - BT.reset(new BugType("Checking analyzer assumptions", "debug")); + BT.reset(new BugType(this, "Checking analyzer assumptions", "debug")); BugReport *R = new BugReport(*BT, getArgumentValueString(CE, C), N); C.emitReport(R); @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerWarnIfReached(const CallExpr *CE, ExplodedNode *N = C.getPredecessor(); if (!BT) - BT.reset(new BugType("Checking analyzer assumptions", "debug")); + BT.reset(new BugType(this, "Checking analyzer assumptions", "debug")); BugReport *R = new BugReport(*BT, "REACHABLE", N); C.emitReport(R); @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ void ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerCheckInlined(const CallExpr *CE, return; if (!BT) - BT.reset(new BugType("Checking analyzer assumptions", "debug")); + BT.reset(new BugType(this, "Checking analyzer assumptions", "debug")); BugReport *R = new BugReport(*BT, getArgumentValueString(CE, C), N); C.emitReport(R); |