Add a wicked little test-case that illustrates what we have to deal

with to properly support member access expressions in templates. This
test is XFAIL'd, because we get it completely wrong, but I've made the
minimal changes to the representation to at least avoid a crash.

llvm-svn: 80856

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/NestedNameSpecifier.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/NestedNameSpecifier.cpp
index 0376f9db6be..0c24c89b291 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/NestedNameSpecifier.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/NestedNameSpecifier.cpp
@@ -75,7 +75,17 @@ NestedNameSpecifier::Create(ASTContext &Context, NestedNameSpecifier *Prefix,
   Mockup.Specifier = T;
   return FindOrInsert(Context, Mockup);
 }
-  
+
+NestedNameSpecifier *
+NestedNameSpecifier::Create(ASTContext &Context, IdentifierInfo *II) {
+  assert(II && "Identifier cannot be NULL");
+  NestedNameSpecifier Mockup;
+  Mockup.Prefix.setPointer(0);
+  Mockup.Prefix.setInt(Identifier);
+  Mockup.Specifier = II;
+  return FindOrInsert(Context, Mockup);
+}
+
 NestedNameSpecifier *NestedNameSpecifier::GlobalSpecifier(ASTContext &Context) {
   if (!Context.GlobalNestedNameSpecifier)
     Context.GlobalNestedNameSpecifier = new (Context, 4) NestedNameSpecifier();