bcm5719-llvm/llvm/lib/Target/BPF/InstPrinter, branch meklort-10.0.1

[BPF] Move InstPrinter files to MCTargetDesc. NFC

2019-05-11T01:13:21+00:00

For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets, the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same structure. llvm-svn: 360494

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo

2019-01-19T08:50:56+00:00

to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636

Remove some unused includes to fix layering.

2018-03-29T00:29:45+00:00

llvm-svn: 328745

bpf: add support for objdump -print-imm-hex

2017-12-20T19:39:58+00:00

Add support for 'objdump -print-imm-hex' for imm64, operand imm and branch target. If user programs encode immediate values as hex numbers, such an option will make it easy to correlate asm insns with source code. This option also makes it easy to correlate imm values with insn encoding. There is one changed behavior in this patch. In old way, we print the 64bit imm as u64: O << (uint64_t)Op.getImm(); and the new way is: O << formatImm(Op.getImm()); The formatImm is defined in llvm/MC/MCInstPrinter.h as format_object formatImm(int64_t Value) So the new way to print 64bit imm is i64 type. If a 64bit value has the highest bit set, the old way will print the value as a positive value and the new way will print as a negative value. The new way is consistent with x86_64. For the code (see the test program): ... if (a == 0xABCDABCDabcdabcdULL) ... x86_64 objdump, with and without -print-imm-hex, looks like: 48 b8 cd ab cd ab cd ab cd ab movabsq $-6067004223159161907, %rax 48 b8 cd ab cd ab cd ab cd ab movabsq $-0x5432543254325433, %rax Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song llvm-svn: 321215

bpf: print backward branch target properly

2017-11-16T19:15:36+00:00

Currently, it prints the backward branch offset as unsigned value like below: 7: 7d 34 0b 00 00 00 00 00 if r4 s>= r3 goto 11 8: b7 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r0 = 0 LBB0_2: 9: 07 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 r0 += 1 ...... 17: bf 31 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = r3 18: 6d 32 f6 ff 00 00 00 00 if r2 s> r3 goto 65526 The correct print insn 18 should be: 18: 6d 32 f6 ff 00 00 00 00 if r2 s> r3 goto -10 To provide better clarity and be consistent with kernel verifier output, the insn 7 output is changed to the following with "+" added to non-negative branch offset: 7: 7d 34 0b 00 00 00 00 00 if r4 s>= r3 goto +11 Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov llvm-svn: 318442

bpf: add " ll" in the LD_IMM64 asmstring

2017-09-11T23:43:35+00:00

This partially revert previous fix in commit f5858045aa0b ("bpf: proper print imm64 expression in inst printer"). In that commit, the original suffix "ll" is removed from LD_IMM64 asmstring. In the customer print method, the "ll" suffix is printed if the rhs is an immediate. For example, "r2 = 5ll" => "r2 = 5ll", and "r3 = varll" => "r3 = var". This has an issue though for assembler. Since assembler relies on asmstring to do pattern matching, it will not be able to distiguish between "mov r2, 5" and "ld_imm64 r2, 5" since both asmstring is "r2 = 5". In such cases, the assembler uses 64bit load for all "r = " asm insts. This patch adds back " ll" suffix for ld_imm64 with one additional space for "#reg = #global_var" case. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov llvm-svn: 312978

bpf: proper print imm64 expression in inst printer

2017-09-08T23:32:38+00:00

Fixed an issue in printImm64Operand where if the value is an expression, print out the expression properly. Currently, it will print r1 = ll With the patch, the printout will be r1 = tx_port Suggested-by: Jiong Wang Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov llvm-svn: 312833

Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....

2017-06-06T11:49:48+00:00

I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days. I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately) or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that I didn't want to disturb in this patch. This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format over your #include lines in the files. Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again). llvm-svn: 304787

convert bpf assembler to look like kernel verifier output

2016-11-18T02:32:35+00:00

since bpf instruction set was introduced people learned to read and understand kernel verifier output whereas llvm asm output stayed obscure and unknown. Convert llvm to emit assembler text similar to kernel to avoid this discrepancy Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov llvm-svn: 287300

Remove autoconf support

2016-01-26T21:29:08+00:00

Summary: This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html "I felt a great disturbance in the [build system], as if millions of [makefiles] suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something [amazing] has happened." - Obi Wan Kenobi Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, tstellarAMD, echristo, whitequark Subscribers: chfast, simoncook, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, jfb, danalbert, srhines, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dsanders, joker.eph, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16471 llvm-svn: 258861