bcm5719-llvm/lldb/test/expression_command/persistent_ptr_update, branch meklort-10.0.1

Move lldb/test to lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test.

2015-10-28T17:43:26+00:00

This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with `test`). llvm-svn: 251532

Rename `lldb_shared` to `use_lldb_suite`.

2015-10-27T20:12:05+00:00

llvm-svn: 251444

Add from future import print_function everywhere.

2015-10-23T17:04:29+00:00

Apparently there were tons of instances I missed last time, I guess I accidentally ran 2to3 non-recursively. This should be every occurrence of a print statement fixed to use a print function as well as from __future__ import print_function being added to every file. After this patch print statements will stop working everywhere in the test suite, and the print function should be used instead. llvm-svn: 251121

Update every test to import `lldb_shared`.

2015-10-22T20:06:20+00:00

This is necessary in order to allow third party modules to be located under lldb/third_party rather than under the test folder directly. Since we're already touching every test file anyway, we also go ahead and delete the unittest2 import and main block wherever possible. The ability to run a test as a standalone file has already been broken for some time, and if we decide we want this back, we should use unittest instead of unittest2. A few places could not have the import of unittest2 removed,because they depend on the unittest2.expectedFailure or skip decorators. Removing all those was orthogonal in spirit to the purpose of this CL, so the import of unittest2 remains in those files that were using it for its test decorators. Those can be addressed separately. llvm-svn: 251055

Merge dwarf and dsym tests

2015-09-30T10:12:40+00:00

Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be added at a later commit). Main design goals: * There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and we can't miss one of the debug info type. * In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs * Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can run exactly 1 test with "-f ." syntax * Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't preferable) Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test cases fixed up for the new style): * Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all debug info separately and this test function should call just "self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info * When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info format in the test class with the name "_" and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the debug info will be visible from the end of the test name) * Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an inferior Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028 llvm-svn: 248883

Set the default language to use when evaluating to that of the frame's CU.

2015-09-04T01:02:30+00:00

* Use the frame's context (instead of just the target's) when evaluating, so that the language of the frame's CU can be used to select the compiler and/or compiler options to use when parsing the expression. This allows for modules built with mixed languages to be parsed in the context of their frame. * Add all C and C++ language variants when determining the language options to set. * Enable C++ language options when language is C or ObjC as a workaround since the expression parser uses features of C++ to capture values. * Enable ObjC language options when language is C++ as a workaround for ObjC requirements. * Disable C++11 language options when language is C++03. * Add test TestMixedLanguages.py to check that the language being used for evaluation is that of the frame. * Fix test TestExprOptions.py to check for C++11 instead of C++ since C++ has to be enabled for C, and remove redundant expr --language test for ObjC. * Fix TestPersistentPtrUpdate.py to not require C++11 in C. Reviewed by: clayborg, spyffe, jingham Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11102 llvm-svn: 246829

Reversed r238363, because the message is inconsistent

2015-07-01T23:56:30+00:00

with all the other assertion messages. llvm-svn: 241212

[TestBase.runCmd] Better error message when runCmd fails.

2015-05-27T22:27:41+00:00

Summary: Before: AssertionError: False is not True : Process is launched successfully After: AssertionError: False is not True : Command 'run a.out' failed. >>> error: invalid target, create a target using the 'target create' command >>> Process could not be launched successfully Reviewers: clayborg Reviewed By: clayborg Subscribers: lldb-commits, vharron Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9948 llvm-svn: 238363

Constant result ValueObjects are - well - constant

2015-05-16T01:27:00+00:00

And they also do not have a thread/frame attached to them That makes dynamic and synthetic values attached to them impossible to update - which, among other things, makes it impossible to properly display persistent variables of types that could have such dynamic/persistent values Fix this by making it so that a ValueObject can control its constantness (hint: dynamic and synthetic values cannot be constant) and whether it wants to let itself be updated when an invalid thread is around llvm-svn: 237504